From: "Roman V. Shaposhnik" <rvs@sun.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Subject: Re: [9fans] web server
Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2009 14:59:56 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1240783196.25846.51.camel@goose.sun.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49E86DE4.4060008@proweb.co.uk>
On Fri, 2009-04-17 at 12:54 +0100, maht wrote:
> >>> How difficult would it be to use rails or merb in plan9? Is it feasible?
> Not Rails or merb or anything non Plan 9 but a few of us are building an
> rc shell based system that works anywhere CGI and Plan 9 / plan9port is
> available.
>
> http://werc.cat-v.org/
I was not aware of werc. Is there a good doc for it?
Thanks,
Roman.
P.S. So far it seems that werc wouldn't be able to manage
highly dynamic and volatile URI hierarchies as long as it
is run under anything but Plan9. Ironically it doesn't
seem to run there.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-04-26 21:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-04-16 16:10 Rudolf Sykora
2009-04-16 16:16 ` erik quanstrom
2009-04-18 17:19 ` Enrico Weigelt
2009-04-26 21:43 ` Roman V. Shaposhnik
2009-04-16 16:18 ` Devon H. O'Dell
2009-04-16 16:22 ` Rudolf Sykora
2009-04-16 16:26 ` erik quanstrom
2009-04-16 17:22 ` [9fans] Rails? (was Re: web server) Pietro Gagliardi
2009-04-16 17:41 ` hiro
2009-04-16 17:50 ` Devon H. O'Dell
2009-04-16 18:19 ` Pietro Gagliardi
2009-04-16 18:51 ` erik quanstrom
2009-04-17 19:46 ` Tom Lieber
2009-04-16 17:58 ` Jack Johnson
2009-04-17 11:54 ` [9fans] web server maht
2009-04-17 12:02 ` Rudolf Sykora
2009-04-26 21:59 ` Roman V. Shaposhnik [this message]
2009-04-27 11:16 ` Uriel
2009-04-27 17:35 ` maht
2009-04-27 17:53 ` erik quanstrom
2009-04-28 18:36 ` maht
2009-04-17 12:31 ` Uriel
2009-04-17 12:45 ` Rudolf Sykora
2009-04-17 12:51 ` Devon H. O'Dell
2009-04-17 13:53 ` maht
2009-04-17 14:07 ` Rudolf Sykora
2009-04-18 22:16 ` Uriel
2009-04-18 22:31 ` john
2009-04-18 23:00 ` Uriel
2009-04-19 0:59 ` john
2009-04-19 6:57 ` Steve Simon
2009-04-19 11:52 ` erik quanstrom
2009-04-19 13:10 ` john
2009-04-19 13:38 ` erik quanstrom
2009-04-19 16:02 ` Skip Tavakkolian
2009-04-19 17:05 ` erik quanstrom
2009-04-19 22:02 ` Federico G. Benavento
2009-04-19 23:21 ` erik quanstrom
2009-04-20 0:05 ` Federico G. Benavento
2009-04-20 1:42 ` Skip Tavakkolian
2009-04-20 2:04 ` erik quanstrom
2009-04-20 16:17 ` maht
2009-04-17 13:22 ` erik quanstrom
2009-04-18 22:13 ` Uriel
2009-04-18 22:27 ` erik quanstrom
2009-04-18 22:56 ` Uriel
2009-04-19 0:45 ` erik quanstrom
2009-04-26 22:08 ` Roman V. Shaposhnik
2009-04-26 22:34 ` hiro
2009-04-27 12:03 ` erik quanstrom
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2000-12-18 12:08 [9fans] Web Server forsyth
2000-12-18 10:02 thedesertfox95
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1240783196.25846.51.camel@goose.sun.com \
--to=rvs@sun.com \
--cc=9fans@9fans.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).