9fans - fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: anothy@cosym.net
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] User Interface
Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2001 13:13:55 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010814171400.CD120199E9@mail.cse.psu.edu> (raw)

// ...I have never seen a more awkward user  interface since twm.

i'm not sure how much of this to attribute to lack of familiarity and how
much to simple personal preference. the GUI is definatly stylistically very
different from any i've seen from any other lineage (X, MS, Mac, etc).
but it is, in my mind, what a UI should be: exactly enough to facilitate
you doing your work, without getting in your way or distracting you.

// ...sam and acme are virtually unusable. Why is it that such a simple
// task as editing the contents of a textfile must cause so much pain?

what specifically is your complaint? i've found sam very easy to learn,
and have taught it to several non-Plan9 (even some non-techie) folks,
with good results. acme is a bit more learning, it's true, but you get a
bunch more out of it (IMHO). and _certainly_ either one gives much
more than any Win32 editor i've seen (well, except sam ☺).

// Why is there not just one single command to create a new user...

if this is a big issue, it's quite easy to script. the commands are both
consistant and simple. the seperation comes, basically, from the fact
that you're really doing seperate operations: adding the user to the
auth database, then adding the user to the file server. both arn't
technically required, although normal operation requires them.

again, the point here is that the commands are simple enough so that
if them being seperate is an issue, you can easialy script them into
something appropriate for your site or installation.

// In my opinion every task performed on a computer [...] should be
// done with the aid of a simple, intuitive,  point- and- click, graphical
// user interface.

well, here it just sounds like we're at a philosophical diference. the plan
9 community tends strongly to believe that there are many tasks that
are ill-suited to GUI interaction, and are much more efficiently done
via CLI and scripted interfaces. administrative tasks, as in the examples
provided by other responses, are probably the clearest examples, but
others abound.

i'm also reminded of a quote i read somewhere but can't place:
	"The only 'intuitive' interface is the nipple. After that, it's all learned."
-α.



             reply	other threads:[~2001-08-14 17:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-08-14 17:13 anothy [this message]
2001-08-14 17:24 ` Re[2]: " Matt
2001-08-17  8:48   ` Chet Ramey
2001-08-15 17:06 ` Boyd Roberts
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-08-23 15:35 Vincent van Gelderen
2001-08-20 15:02 Re[2]: " anothy
2001-08-22 21:25 ` Matthew Hannigan
2001-08-23  2:24   ` Boyd Roberts
2001-08-23 15:04     ` Dan Cross
2001-08-23 20:17       ` Boyd Roberts
2001-08-23 20:17       ` Boyd Roberts
2001-08-23 20:17       ` Boyd Roberts
2001-08-23 21:35         ` Dan Cross
2001-08-23 21:49           ` Boyd Roberts
2001-08-24 13:04         ` David Lukes
2001-08-17 11:17 forsyth
2001-08-16  1:00 okamoto
2001-08-16  5:56 ` Fariborz 'Skip' Tavakkolian
2001-08-15 14:20 bwc
2001-08-15 17:13 ` Boyd Roberts
2001-08-15 13:27 Peter Bosch
2001-08-15 12:46 rob pike
2001-08-15 16:35 ` Boyd Roberts
2001-08-14 17:58 bwc
2001-08-14 19:09 ` andrey mirtchovski
2001-08-14 16:53 forsyth
     [not found] <rob@plan9.bell-labs.com>
2001-08-14 12:54 ` rob pike
2001-08-14 15:01   ` James A. Robinson
2001-08-16 13:45   ` phaet0n
2001-08-20  8:57   ` Randolph Fritz
2001-08-14 10:02 nigel
2001-08-14 10:27 ` Lucio De Re
2001-08-14 12:45   ` pac
2001-08-15  8:34     ` Eric de Redelijkheid
2001-08-16  0:59       ` Micah Stetson
2001-08-15 23:25         ` Boyd Roberts
2001-08-16  8:28       ` Douglas A. Gwyn
     [not found]     ` <200108151619.MAA07420@augusta.math.psu.edu>
2001-08-16  8:28       ` Eric de Redelijkheid
2001-08-16 10:26         ` Re[2]: " Matt
2001-08-16 10:43           ` Eric de Redelijkheid
2001-08-16 19:29         ` Steve Kilbane
2001-08-16 20:40           ` Boyd Roberts
2001-08-17  8:50           ` mark powers
2001-08-17  8:49         ` Douglas A. Gwyn
2001-08-14  9:46 Eric de Redelijkheid
2001-08-14 13:15 ` John Murdie
2001-08-15 13:23 ` William K. Josephson
2001-08-16 21:04 ` Boyd Roberts

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20010814171400.CD120199E9@mail.cse.psu.edu \
    --to=anothy@cosym.net \
    --cc=9fans@cse.psu.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).