9fans - fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Re: [9fans] List <-> News gateway?
@ 2002-02-27 13:41 Matt H
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 22+ messages in thread
From: Matt H @ 2002-02-27 13:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: 9fans



I'd always assumed they were the same, I hope I'm not missing anything!

I prefer the email version because I already poll my mail server and having to poll the newserver too seems a bit of a waste.

plus I archive my mail and I'm not about to start archiving usenet!

M



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread

* Re: [9fans] List <-> News gateway?
  2002-02-27 22:14           ` George Michaelson
  2002-02-28 19:55             ` Andrew Simmons
@ 2002-03-01 16:04             ` ozan s yigit
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 22+ messages in thread
From: ozan s yigit @ 2002-03-01 16:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: 9fans


>A monoatheistical selection of the analects would be more useful
>
>	'The gospel according to pike'
>
>being different to:
>
>	'The apocryphal book of boyd'
>
>but both having their place.

Zen Student: So Master, is the soul immortal or not? Do we survive
our bodily death or do we get annihilated? Do we really reincarnate?
Does our soul split up into component parts which get recycled, or do
we as a single unit enter the body of a biological organism? And do we
retain our memories or not? Or is the doctrine of reincarnation false?
Is perhaps the christian notion of survival more correct? And if so,
do we get bodily resurrected, or does our soul enter a purely
platonic spiritual realm?

Master: Your breakfast is getting cold.

[from: Raymond M. Smullyan, "The Tao is Silent", Harper & Row, 1977]
---
oz


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread

* Re: [9fans] List <-> News gateway?
  2002-02-28 19:55             ` Andrew Simmons
@ 2002-03-01 10:03               ` Thomas Bushnell, BSG
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 22+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Bushnell, BSG @ 2002-03-01 10:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: 9fans

andrew@mbmnz.co.nz (Andrew Simmons) writes:

> Good concept. Perhaps we could also have a special section for the words of
> the prophet Bushnell, crying out in the wilderness - "The GNU Public
> Licence is a jealous Licence, Thou shalt have none other Licence but me"

Oh, heck no!  The GPL is only one of several rites within the Church
of Free Software.  We respect all the other rites.  


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread

* Re: [9fans] List <-> News gateway?
  2002-02-27 22:14           ` George Michaelson
@ 2002-02-28 19:55             ` Andrew Simmons
  2002-03-01 10:03               ` Thomas Bushnell, BSG
  2002-03-01 16:04             ` ozan s yigit
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 22+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Simmons @ 2002-02-28 19:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: 9fans

George Michaelson  wrote:
>
>A monoatheistical selection of the analects would be more useful
>
>	'The gospel according to pike'
>
>being different to:
>
>	'The apocryphal book of boyd'
>
>but both having their place.
>
Good concept. Perhaps we could also have a special section for the words of
the prophet Bushnell, crying out in the wilderness - "The GNU Public
Licence is a jealous Licence, Thou shalt have none other Licence but me"



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread

* Re: [9fans] List <-> News gateway?
  2002-02-27 10:06 Roger Peppe
@ 2002-02-28 10:14 ` Thomas Bushnell, BSG
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 22+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Bushnell, BSG @ 2002-02-28 10:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: 9fans

Roger Peppe <rog@vitanuova.com> writes:

> i don't see how they could have different spirits when they they've
> always been (more-or-less) the same thing.

9fans is a mailing list, which culturally, gets whatever charter it
wants.  By its very title, it's a list for fans of Plan 9.

Usenet groups, such as comp.os.FOO have much broader charters.  It is
not reasonable to restrict comp.os.FOO to only fans of FOO.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread

* Re: [9fans] List <-> News gateway?
  2002-02-27 21:38       ` Andrew Simmons
  2002-02-27 21:40         ` Dan Cross
@ 2002-02-28  9:58         ` Thomas Bushnell, BSG
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 22+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Bushnell, BSG @ 2002-02-28  9:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: 9fans

andrew@mbmnz.co.nz (Andrew Simmons) writes:

> It's hard to see any point in changing, unless the person who raised the
> issue has a really compelling justification.

I raised the issue, in response to the claim that a posting was not
approprate for comp.os.plan9, on the grounds that it is gatewayed to
9fans, which is only for fans of Plan 9.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread

* Re: [9fans] List <-> News gateway?
  2002-02-27 21:40         ` Dan Cross
@ 2002-02-27 22:14           ` George Michaelson
  2002-02-28 19:55             ` Andrew Simmons
  2002-03-01 16:04             ` ozan s yigit
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 22+ messages in thread
From: George Michaelson @ 2002-02-27 22:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: 9fans


> It certainly seems that the overwhelming majority would like to see things
> remain as they are.

I would sometimes like a digest with gated entry. 9fans is the torah which
as we know, can mean anything to kabbalists depending on what dice-throw
algorithm they use to select the words to read. 

A monoatheistical selection of the analects would be more useful

	'The gospel according to pike'

being different to:

	'The apocryphal book of boyd'

but both having their place.

Of course, we also need a concordance. And, translation into Aramaic.

-George


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread

* Re: [9fans] List <-> News gateway?
  2002-02-27 21:38       ` Andrew Simmons
@ 2002-02-27 21:40         ` Dan Cross
  2002-02-27 22:14           ` George Michaelson
  2002-02-28  9:58         ` Thomas Bushnell, BSG
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 22+ messages in thread
From: Dan Cross @ 2002-02-27 21:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: 9fans

It certainly seems that the overwhelming majority would like to see things
remain as they are.

	- Dan C.



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread

* Re: [9fans] List <-> News gateway?
  2002-02-27 21:17     ` Dan Cross
@ 2002-02-27 21:38       ` Andrew Simmons
  2002-02-27 21:40         ` Dan Cross
  2002-02-28  9:58         ` Thomas Bushnell, BSG
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 22+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Simmons @ 2002-02-27 21:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: 9fans

>
>Well, I wouldn't necessarily say that they have two different spirits;
>the issue was raised to me, not the other way around.
>
>	- Dan C.
>
It's hard to see any point in changing, unless the person who raised the
issue has a really compelling justification.



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread

* Re: [9fans] List <-> News gateway?
  2002-02-27 19:28   ` Andrew Simmons
@ 2002-02-27 21:17     ` Dan Cross
  2002-02-27 21:38       ` Andrew Simmons
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 22+ messages in thread
From: Dan Cross @ 2002-02-27 21:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: 9fans

> On Tue, Feb 26, 2002 at 12:46:26PM -0500, Dan Cross wrote:
> > Here's a question; how many people read comp.os.plan9 versus how many people
> > are on 9fans?  The issue has been raised that comp.os.plan9 and 9fans have
> > very different spirits, and should, perhaps, be divorced from one another.
> > What are people's opinions on this?
> 
> How would you characterise the different spirits of the two groups, and
> what advantage would you see to either group in a split?

Well, I wouldn't necessarily say that they have two different spirits;
the issue was raised to me, not the other way around.

	- Dan C.



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread

* Re: [9fans] List <-> News gateway?
  2002-02-27  4:41 ` Lucio De Re
@ 2002-02-27 19:28   ` Andrew Simmons
  2002-02-27 21:17     ` Dan Cross
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 22+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Simmons @ 2002-02-27 19:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: 9fans

On Tue, Feb 26, 2002 at 12:46:26PM -0500, Dan Cross wrote:
> 
> Here's a question; how many people read comp.os.plan9 versus how many people
> are on 9fans?  The issue has been raised that comp.os.plan9 and 9fans have
> very different spirits, and should, perhaps, be divorced from one another.
> What are people's opinions on this?
> 
How would you characterise the different spirits of the two groups, and
what advantage would you see to either group in a split?



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread

* Re: [9fans] List <-> News gateway?
  2002-02-27  9:13 Fco.J.Ballesteros
@ 2002-02-27 13:19 ` Boyd Roberts
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 22+ messages in thread
From: Boyd Roberts @ 2002-02-27 13:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: 9fans

Keep 'em together.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread

* Re: [9fans] List <-> News gateway?
  2002-02-27 10:20 ` Thomas Bushnell, BSG
@ 2002-02-27 10:52   ` Lucio De Re
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 22+ messages in thread
From: Lucio De Re @ 2002-02-27 10:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: 9fans

On Wed, Feb 27, 2002 at 10:20:24AM +0000, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> 
> Sometimes there are attempts to say "such and such is inappropriate on
> comp.os.plan9, because it is for 9fans only", or other things similar
> to that.  

It's OK, we have a moderator <wink>.

++L


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread

* Re: [9fans] List <-> News gateway?
  2002-02-27  3:04 Russ Cox
@ 2002-02-27 10:20 ` Thomas Bushnell, BSG
  2002-02-27 10:52   ` Lucio De Re
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 22+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Bushnell, BSG @ 2002-02-27 10:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: 9fans

rsc@plan9.bell-labs.com (Russ Cox) writes:

> This seems to come up every year or so.
> I don't really understand the argument --
> since they are one and the same how can
> they have very different spirits?

I believe the problem is that "9fans" (according to its name) is for
fans of Plan 9.  

Whereas comp.os.FOO is for both fans of FOO, people who are skeptical
about FOO, people who want to understand both strengths *and*
weaknesses of FOO, and so forth.

Sometimes there are attempts to say "such and such is inappropriate on
comp.os.plan9, because it is for 9fans only", or other things similar
to that.  


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread

* Re: [9fans] List <-> News gateway?
  2002-02-26 23:58 ` paurea
@ 2002-02-27 10:20   ` Sam Hopkins
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 22+ messages in thread
From: Sam Hopkins @ 2002-02-27 10:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: 9fans

Yeah, the ability to use google's deja.com search on the 9fans
has helped me several times.

Sam

On Tuesday 26 February 2002 18:58, you wrote:
> Dan Cross writes:
>  > Here's a question; how many people read comp.os.plan9 versus how many
>  > people are on 9fans?  The issue has been raised that comp.os.plan9 and
>  > 9fans have very different spirits, and should, perhaps, be divorced from
>  > one another. What are people's opinions on this?
>
> I think this is a very little community and splitting it is not a good
> idea. Also I like to be able to read 9fans at different places using the
> news.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread

* Re: [9fans] List <-> News gateway?
@ 2002-02-27 10:06 Roger Peppe
  2002-02-28 10:14 ` Thomas Bushnell, BSG
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 22+ messages in thread
From: Roger Peppe @ 2002-02-27 10:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: 9fans

> Here's a question; how many people read comp.os.plan9 versus how many people
> are on 9fans?  The issue has been raised that comp.os.plan9 and 9fans have
> very different spirits, and should, perhaps, be divorced from one another.
> What are people's opinions on this?

i read it by email, but have to respond via usenet these days due to
the broken mail server at cse.psu.edu.

i don't see how they could have different spirits when they they've
always been (more-or-less) the same thing.

whether they *should* be different is another question.  personally i
don't read usenet any more, so if they were split, the mailing list is
the one i'd continue to read (but i'd be unable to post to it, which
would be annoying).

  rog.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread

* Re: [9fans] List <-> News gateway?
@ 2002-02-27  9:13 Fco.J.Ballesteros
  2002-02-27 13:19 ` Boyd Roberts
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 22+ messages in thread
From: Fco.J.Ballesteros @ 2002-02-27  9:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: 9fans

Please, keep them together ☺.



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread

* Re: [9fans] List <-> News gateway?
  2002-02-26 17:46 Dan Cross
  2002-02-26 23:58 ` paurea
  2002-02-27  4:41 ` Lucio De Re
@ 2002-02-27  7:17 ` Tomas
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 22+ messages in thread
From: Tomas @ 2002-02-27  7:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: 9fans

On Tue, 26 Feb 2002 at 12:46pm, Dan Cross wrote:

> Here's a question; how many people read comp.os.plan9 versus
> how many people are on 9fans? The issue has been raised that
> comp.os.plan9 and 9fans have very different spirits, and
> should, perhaps, be divorced from one another. What are
> people's opinions on this?

I subscribe to both 9fans and comp.os.plan9, and have my
newsreader set up to kill any message with [9fans] in the subject
line. This leaves me with less than one message per week to read
in comp.os.plan9, and it's usually a message that I have already
read in 9fans but for some reason the mail->news gateway hasn't
added the [9fans] tag to it, or, perhaps more likely, the person
who posted it sent it to both 9fans and comp.os.plan9.

So unless my newsfeed for comp.os.plan9 is bad and I'm missing
lots of posts, I can't understand where this idea of different
spirits comes from, since as far as I can see it's virtually the
same discussions in both forums.

I say don't divorce the two.

/Tomas - now, if only I could get my mouse working in Plan9...



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread

* Re: [9fans] List <-> News gateway?
  2002-02-26 17:46 Dan Cross
  2002-02-26 23:58 ` paurea
@ 2002-02-27  4:41 ` Lucio De Re
  2002-02-27 19:28   ` Andrew Simmons
  2002-02-27  7:17 ` Tomas
  2 siblings, 1 reply; 22+ messages in thread
From: Lucio De Re @ 2002-02-27  4:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: 9fans

On Tue, Feb 26, 2002 at 12:46:26PM -0500, Dan Cross wrote:
> 
> Here's a question; how many people read comp.os.plan9 versus how many people
> are on 9fans?  The issue has been raised that comp.os.plan9 and 9fans have
> very different spirits, and should, perhaps, be divorced from one another.
> What are people's opinions on this?
> 
I have no access to Usenet News and in general prefer
the opt-in feature of mailing lists.  But I have provided mail-to-news
gateways in the past because the underlying NetNews system is, in my
opinion, better suited to tracking messages and subject threads.

For 9fans, I think the present approach is quite reasonable and would
not be improved by the obvious change.  There may well be some other
change that would improve matters, but I don't know what that is
likely to be.

++L


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread

* Re: [9fans] List <-> News gateway?
@ 2002-02-27  3:04 Russ Cox
  2002-02-27 10:20 ` Thomas Bushnell, BSG
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 22+ messages in thread
From: Russ Cox @ 2002-02-27  3:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: 9fans

 > Here's a question; how many people read comp.os.plan9 versus how many people
 > are on 9fans?  The issue has been raised that comp.os.plan9 and 9fans have
 > very different spirits, and should, perhaps, be divorced from one another.
 > What are people's opinions on this?

This seems to come up every year or so.
I don't really understand the argument --
since they are one and the same how can
they have very different spirits?

I like the facts that there is only one place and
that I don't have to use my primitive News
reader to read it.

Russ



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread

* Re: [9fans] List <-> News gateway?
  2002-02-26 17:46 Dan Cross
@ 2002-02-26 23:58 ` paurea
  2002-02-27 10:20   ` Sam Hopkins
  2002-02-27  4:41 ` Lucio De Re
  2002-02-27  7:17 ` Tomas
  2 siblings, 1 reply; 22+ messages in thread
From: paurea @ 2002-02-26 23:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: 9fans

Dan Cross writes:
 > Here's a question; how many people read comp.os.plan9 versus how many people
 > are on 9fans?  The issue has been raised that comp.os.plan9 and 9fans have
 > very different spirits, and should, perhaps, be divorced from one another.
 > What are people's opinions on this?
 > 


I think this is a very little community and splitting it is not a good idea.
Also I like to be able to read 9fans at different places using the news.
-- 
                 Saludos,
                         Gorka

"Curiosity sKilled the cat"


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread

* [9fans] List <-> News gateway?
@ 2002-02-26 17:46 Dan Cross
  2002-02-26 23:58 ` paurea
                   ` (2 more replies)
  0 siblings, 3 replies; 22+ messages in thread
From: Dan Cross @ 2002-02-26 17:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: 9fans

Here's a question; how many people read comp.os.plan9 versus how many people
are on 9fans?  The issue has been raised that comp.os.plan9 and 9fans have
very different spirits, and should, perhaps, be divorced from one another.
What are people's opinions on this?

	- Dan C.



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2002-03-01 16:04 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-02-27 13:41 [9fans] List <-> News gateway? Matt H
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-02-27 10:06 Roger Peppe
2002-02-28 10:14 ` Thomas Bushnell, BSG
2002-02-27  9:13 Fco.J.Ballesteros
2002-02-27 13:19 ` Boyd Roberts
2002-02-27  3:04 Russ Cox
2002-02-27 10:20 ` Thomas Bushnell, BSG
2002-02-27 10:52   ` Lucio De Re
2002-02-26 17:46 Dan Cross
2002-02-26 23:58 ` paurea
2002-02-27 10:20   ` Sam Hopkins
2002-02-27  4:41 ` Lucio De Re
2002-02-27 19:28   ` Andrew Simmons
2002-02-27 21:17     ` Dan Cross
2002-02-27 21:38       ` Andrew Simmons
2002-02-27 21:40         ` Dan Cross
2002-02-27 22:14           ` George Michaelson
2002-02-28 19:55             ` Andrew Simmons
2002-03-01 10:03               ` Thomas Bushnell, BSG
2002-03-01 16:04             ` ozan s yigit
2002-02-28  9:58         ` Thomas Bushnell, BSG
2002-02-27  7:17 ` Tomas

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).