From: Lucio De Re <lucio@proxima.alt.za>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] factotum & invalid entries
Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2005 12:05:09 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2872b3cbd27d48bc556bc9be60560d38@proxima.alt.za> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d27a7e748cad46f195041c57a651ad70@ar.aichi-u.ac.jp>
> If factotum automatically changed
> key proto=p9sk1 dom=proxima.alt.za user=lucio !password?
> disabled key proto=p9sk1 dom=outside.plan9.bell-labs.com user=lucio
> !password?
> when it know the list is useless, you can add
> key proto=p9sk1 dom=outside.plan9.bell-labs.com user= proxima
> !password?
> at the place of disabled entry. this is what you desire.
It's not what I desire: I don't want erroneous records in the factotum
database and I fail to see why anyone else would. It solves a
non-existent problem, as deleting the record has the same effect.
> What is the problem?
Ugliness? Note that the record is the most recently added record, so
the sequence is not affected.
> If factotum have deleted erroneous record then factotum put next record
> only at the end. If order is matter this make a problem.
But factotum always did that, and it's precisely what I would do
manually. As I mentioned, the sequence is not altered, nor should it
really matter if it was altered.
++L
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-02-07 10:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-02-06 2:45 YAMANASHI Takeshi
2005-02-06 16:12 ` Russ Cox
2005-02-06 20:00 ` Tiit Lankots
2005-02-07 5:25 ` Lucio De Re
2005-02-07 5:42 ` arisawa
2005-02-07 6:03 ` Lucio De Re
2005-02-07 6:47 ` arisawa
2005-02-07 7:26 ` Lucio De Re
2005-02-07 8:09 ` arisawa
2005-02-07 8:55 ` Lucio De Re
2005-02-07 9:15 ` arisawa
2005-02-07 10:05 ` Lucio De Re [this message]
2005-02-08 5:12 ` Russ Cox
2005-02-08 16:36 ` rog
2005-02-08 16:42 ` Russ Cox
2005-02-08 16:55 ` Lucio De Re
2005-02-08 16:51 ` rog
2005-02-08 16:52 ` Devon H. O'Dell
2005-02-08 17:08 ` Lucio De Re
2005-02-08 17:10 ` rog
2005-02-13 20:03 ` Russ Cox
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-02-14 2:35 YAMANASHI Takeshi
2005-02-14 3:42 ` Russ Cox
2005-02-04 9:31 [9fans] netpbm C H Forsyth
2005-02-05 18:26 ` [9fans] factotum & invalid entries Tiit Lankots
2005-02-05 20:12 ` Russ Cox
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2872b3cbd27d48bc556bc9be60560d38@proxima.alt.za \
--to=lucio@proxima.alt.za \
--cc=9fans@cse.psu.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).