9fans - fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: arisawa@ar.aichi-u.ac.jp
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: [9fans] factotum & invalid entries
Date: Mon,  7 Feb 2005 15:47:52 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <a2e0ad8d5be793f4711d3c7cb99a2bcf@ar.aichi-u.ac.jp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <650b439e355682372e7a55e68df66554@proxima.alt.za>

> Hm. You can't inspect the password at that point (sometimes I wish
> there was a way to do that) so just the username is pertinent.
> Wouldn't a log entry be more useful and less intrusive?
>

I believe factotum does not keep clear password if proto=p9sk1
Then log entry will be useless even if the log shows the key.
If authentication failed and attribute value list is right except
password,
then we should retry with a new password.

Current factotum is inconvenient if the order is matter.
I think my proposal is one of idea to resolve the problem.
Of course if we failed in authentication, then disabled flag will be put
automatically at the beginning of the attribute value list, and if we
succeed
in next authentication the attribute value list is automatically
replaced by new
one without changing the order.

Kenji Arisawa



  reply	other threads:[~2005-02-07  6:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-02-06  2:45 YAMANASHI Takeshi
2005-02-06 16:12 ` Russ Cox
2005-02-06 20:00   ` Tiit Lankots
2005-02-07  5:25   ` Lucio De Re
2005-02-07  5:42     ` arisawa
2005-02-07  6:03       ` Lucio De Re
2005-02-07  6:47         ` arisawa [this message]
2005-02-07  7:26           ` Lucio De Re
2005-02-07  8:09             ` arisawa
2005-02-07  8:55               ` Lucio De Re
2005-02-07  9:15                 ` arisawa
2005-02-07 10:05                   ` Lucio De Re
2005-02-08  5:12                     ` Russ Cox
2005-02-08 16:36                       ` rog
2005-02-08 16:42                         ` Russ Cox
2005-02-08 16:55                           ` Lucio De Re
2005-02-08 16:51                             ` rog
2005-02-08 16:52                             ` Devon H. O'Dell
2005-02-08 17:08                               ` Lucio De Re
2005-02-08 17:10                                 ` rog
2005-02-13 20:03 ` Russ Cox
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-02-14  2:35 YAMANASHI Takeshi
2005-02-14  3:42 ` Russ Cox
2005-02-04  9:31 [9fans] netpbm C H Forsyth
2005-02-05 18:26 ` [9fans] factotum & invalid entries Tiit Lankots
2005-02-05 20:12   ` Russ Cox

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=a2e0ad8d5be793f4711d3c7cb99a2bcf@ar.aichi-u.ac.jp \
    --to=arisawa@ar.aichi-u.ac.jp \
    --cc=9fans@cse.psu.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).