9fans - fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Russ Cox <russcox@gmail.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: [9fans] factotum & invalid entries
Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2005 15:03:59 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ee9e417a050213120392925ea@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <773e440ebeb76f706118be8d73bfca39@orthanc.cc.titech.ac.jp>

> > I changed things so that the new keys get inserted at the beginning
> > of the list.  That should help a bit.
>
> When the factotum is the one started by kernel on a cpu server,
> adding a new key to the beginning of the list might change the
> authdom which the cpu server running in?

I was working on factotum and I realized that this question
doesn't actually make sense.  The cpu server runs in as many
authentication domains as there are p9sk1 server keys in its
factotum.  It doesn't matter where you put the key -- beginning
or end of list.  In the p9any protocol, factotum will offer as possible
authentication domains all the proto=p9sk1 keys that
have no role attribute or an explicit role=server attribute.

It's not generally safe to be using the cpu server factotum as
your personal one, since adding new role-less p9sk1 keys
allows people in those domains to get in.  Probably the key
prompt should make sure to specify a role whenever it asks
for a key.

Russ


  parent reply	other threads:[~2005-02-13 20:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-02-06  2:45 YAMANASHI Takeshi
2005-02-06 16:12 ` Russ Cox
2005-02-06 20:00   ` Tiit Lankots
2005-02-07  5:25   ` Lucio De Re
2005-02-07  5:42     ` arisawa
2005-02-07  6:03       ` Lucio De Re
2005-02-07  6:47         ` arisawa
2005-02-07  7:26           ` Lucio De Re
2005-02-07  8:09             ` arisawa
2005-02-07  8:55               ` Lucio De Re
2005-02-07  9:15                 ` arisawa
2005-02-07 10:05                   ` Lucio De Re
2005-02-08  5:12                     ` Russ Cox
2005-02-08 16:36                       ` rog
2005-02-08 16:42                         ` Russ Cox
2005-02-08 16:55                           ` Lucio De Re
2005-02-08 16:51                             ` rog
2005-02-08 16:52                             ` Devon H. O'Dell
2005-02-08 17:08                               ` Lucio De Re
2005-02-08 17:10                                 ` rog
2005-02-13 20:03 ` Russ Cox [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-02-14  2:35 YAMANASHI Takeshi
2005-02-14  3:42 ` Russ Cox
2005-02-04  9:31 [9fans] netpbm C H Forsyth
2005-02-05 18:26 ` [9fans] factotum & invalid entries Tiit Lankots
2005-02-05 20:12   ` Russ Cox

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ee9e417a050213120392925ea@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=russcox@gmail.com \
    --cc=9fans@cse.psu.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).