From: arisawa@ar.aichi-u.ac.jp
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: [9fans] factotum & invalid entries
Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2005 18:15:41 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d27a7e748cad46f195041c57a651ad70@ar.aichi-u.ac.jp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3258eb01a201159c8e06f2b23d8b8f4b@proxima.alt.za>
> key proto=p9sk1 dom=proxima.alt.za user=lucio !password?
> key proto=p9sk1 dom=outside.plan9.bell-labs.com user=lucio !password?
>
> and I'd religiously delkey the second entry before retrying for
> exactly the reasons raised by pac and Russ.
>
> Now, I submit that factotum would be right to "delkey" the second
> entry as soon as it is aware that the authentication failed. It
> would, by default, overwrite the entry if I changed the password, but
> it is not allowed to do so (by design) if I change the username.
If factotum automatically changed
key proto=p9sk1 dom=proxima.alt.za user=lucio !password?
disabled key proto=p9sk1 dom=outside.plan9.bell-labs.com user=lucio
!password?
when it know the list is useless, you can add
key proto=p9sk1 dom=outside.plan9.bell-labs.com user= proxima
!password?
at the place of disabled entry. this is what you desire.
What is the problem?
If factotum have deleted erroneous record then factotum put next record
only at the end. If order is matter this make a problem.
Kenji Arisawa
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-02-07 9:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-02-06 2:45 YAMANASHI Takeshi
2005-02-06 16:12 ` Russ Cox
2005-02-06 20:00 ` Tiit Lankots
2005-02-07 5:25 ` Lucio De Re
2005-02-07 5:42 ` arisawa
2005-02-07 6:03 ` Lucio De Re
2005-02-07 6:47 ` arisawa
2005-02-07 7:26 ` Lucio De Re
2005-02-07 8:09 ` arisawa
2005-02-07 8:55 ` Lucio De Re
2005-02-07 9:15 ` arisawa [this message]
2005-02-07 10:05 ` Lucio De Re
2005-02-08 5:12 ` Russ Cox
2005-02-08 16:36 ` rog
2005-02-08 16:42 ` Russ Cox
2005-02-08 16:55 ` Lucio De Re
2005-02-08 16:51 ` rog
2005-02-08 16:52 ` Devon H. O'Dell
2005-02-08 17:08 ` Lucio De Re
2005-02-08 17:10 ` rog
2005-02-13 20:03 ` Russ Cox
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-02-14 2:35 YAMANASHI Takeshi
2005-02-14 3:42 ` Russ Cox
2005-02-04 9:31 [9fans] netpbm C H Forsyth
2005-02-05 18:26 ` [9fans] factotum & invalid entries Tiit Lankots
2005-02-05 20:12 ` Russ Cox
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d27a7e748cad46f195041c57a651ad70@ar.aichi-u.ac.jp \
--to=arisawa@ar.aichi-u.ac.jp \
--cc=9fans@cse.psu.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).