From: ron minnich <rminnich@lanl.gov>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] ls, rc question -- proposed change to rc/glob.c
Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2004 14:53:19 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0403211446060.22122-100000@maxroach.lanl.gov> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <393a7f63e7c4973e661988f1009f5d7a@vitanuova.com>
assume lsfilter takes a stream of plan 9 stat structs and turns them into
an 'ls'-like listing
bind -b /usr/rminnich/bin /bin
lsfilter</bin
ls /bin
should these yield the same results? If you don't care, then the libc.a
approach is fine. If you do want the same results, I think you may be
stuck doing the uniqueness tricks in the kernel a la BSD, which to me
anyway is unattractive.
You end up picking your inconsistencies. Right now the inconsistencies are
due to a very simple implementation which acts the same all the time (to
me anyway).
I'm not arguing either way, just wondering.
I also have to wonder about the perceived inconsistent behavior of union
directories and the hacks that people keep developing (BSD) or proposing
(this list) to deal with those inconsistencies. Could this imply that my
CS friend was right and we've got to find another way to get what unions
get us now? I.e. as much as we love them, does the very idea of unions
have a fundamental flaw that requires us to think up something newer and
cleverer? I can't imagine what that could be. Just wondering.
ron
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-03-21 21:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 96+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-03-18 21:40 [9fans] ls question David Tolpin
2004-03-18 21:58 ` Russ Cox
2004-03-18 22:05 ` Russ Cox
2004-03-18 23:00 ` [9fans] ls, rc question David Tolpin
2004-03-18 23:31 ` [9fans] dirread David Tolpin
2004-03-18 23:49 ` ron minnich
2004-03-19 0:14 ` boyd, rounin
2004-03-19 3:38 ` rsc
2004-03-19 3:41 ` [9fans] ls, rc question rsc
2004-03-19 5:32 ` David Tolpin
2004-03-19 5:45 ` boyd, rounin
2004-03-19 5:50 ` ron minnich
2004-03-19 6:45 ` boyd, rounin
2004-03-19 9:07 ` Charles Forsyth
2004-03-19 9:24 ` Richard Miller
2004-03-19 9:33 ` boyd, rounin
2004-03-19 9:39 ` Richard Miller
2004-03-19 9:46 ` Geoff Collyer
2004-03-19 10:11 ` Richard Miller
2004-03-19 10:42 ` Charles Forsyth
2004-03-19 10:03 ` Charles Forsyth
2004-03-19 9:38 ` [9fans] Bind, look, everything is duplicated David Tolpin
2004-03-19 7:01 ` [9fans] ls, rc question Micah Stetson
2004-03-19 7:57 ` [9fans] ls, rc question -- proposed change to rc/glob.c David Tolpin
2004-03-19 8:13 ` Rob Pike
2004-03-19 8:18 ` David Tolpin
2004-03-19 8:24 ` David Tolpin
2004-03-19 8:27 ` Rob Pike
2004-03-19 8:52 ` David Tolpin
2004-03-19 9:16 ` Richard Miller
2004-03-19 9:29 ` boyd, rounin
2004-03-19 9:41 ` Geoff Collyer
2004-03-19 10:09 ` boyd, rounin
2004-03-19 10:50 ` Geoff Collyer
2004-03-19 11:12 ` David Tolpin
2004-03-19 12:31 ` Charles Forsyth
2004-03-19 12:53 ` boyd, rounin
2004-03-19 13:59 ` David Presotto
2004-03-19 14:44 ` David Tolpin
2004-03-19 17:57 ` Russ Cox
2004-03-19 18:04 ` David Tolpin
2004-03-19 20:31 ` Geoff Collyer
2004-03-22 22:56 ` rog
2004-03-22 23:19 ` Scott Schwartz
2004-03-22 23:50 ` Charles Forsyth
2004-03-23 0:28 ` rog
2004-03-23 0:40 ` Charles Forsyth
2004-03-23 0:49 ` Charles Forsyth
2004-03-23 2:12 ` ron minnich
2004-03-23 2:16 ` boyd, rounin
2004-03-23 3:15 ` rog
2004-03-23 11:13 ` a
2004-03-23 11:47 ` Geoff Collyer
2004-03-19 8:31 ` Richard Miller
2004-03-19 8:47 ` Geoff Collyer
2004-03-19 9:07 ` Rob Pike
2004-03-19 9:34 ` David Tolpin
2004-03-19 9:52 ` Scott Schwartz
2004-03-19 14:42 ` ron minnich
2004-03-19 16:18 ` 9nut
2004-03-19 15:34 ` david presotto
2004-03-19 15:43 ` ron minnich
2004-03-19 16:00 ` Charles Forsyth
2004-03-19 16:02 ` Charles Forsyth
2004-03-19 16:23 ` David Presotto
2004-03-19 16:34 ` Richard Miller
2004-03-19 16:47 ` a
2004-03-19 16:52 ` Richard Miller
2004-03-19 17:15 ` David Presotto
2004-03-21 20:47 ` rog
2004-03-21 20:50 ` boyd, rounin
2004-03-21 21:53 ` ron minnich [this message]
2004-03-21 22:05 ` Charles Forsyth
2004-03-21 23:29 ` Enache Adrian
2004-03-22 1:30 ` boyd, rounin
2004-03-22 10:09 ` Douglas A. Gwyn
2004-03-22 10:49 ` Charles Forsyth
2004-03-22 12:15 ` boyd, rounin
2004-03-22 18:23 ` Derek Fawcus
2004-03-23 0:06 ` boyd, rounin
2004-03-19 16:34 ` a
2004-03-19 15:53 ` lucio
2004-03-19 16:01 ` Charles Forsyth
2004-03-19 16:08 ` andrey mirtchovski
2004-03-19 16:12 ` ron minnich
2004-03-19 16:22 ` lucio
2004-03-19 19:42 ` boyd, rounin
2004-03-19 14:13 ` Russ Cox
2004-03-19 14:37 ` David Tolpin
2004-03-19 8:35 ` boyd, rounin
2004-03-19 14:19 ` Russ Cox
2004-03-18 21:59 ` [9fans] ls question David Presotto
2004-03-18 22:05 ` matt
2004-03-18 22:04 ` David Tolpin
2004-03-18 22:08 ` boyd, rounin
2004-03-19 15:59 [9fans] ls, rc question -- proposed change to rc/glob.c Tiit Lankots
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.44.0403211446060.22122-100000@maxroach.lanl.gov \
--to=rminnich@lanl.gov \
--cc=9fans@cse.psu.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).