9fans - fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Van Hensbergen <ericvh@gmail.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Subject: Re: [9fans] IWP9 this year?
Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 10:12:05 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <a4e6962a0904240812h3791f975h21343b480ce0615c@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f158dc670904240728q3bce3aebi27796f4be2f9ad66@mail.gmail.com>

Seconded - I vote for a movement until 1Q10, I think you'll get a lot
more industry participation this way.

       -eric


On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 9:28 AM, Latchesar Ionkov <lucho@ionkov.net> wrote:
> There were some ideas of skipping this year and making the next IWP9
> in the beginning of the next year. End of the year is a difficult time
> for travel, the budgets for travel are depleted, or not if the fiscal
> year starts earlier than the calendar one, not defined well enough.
>
>    Lucho
>
> On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 7:54 AM, Devon H. O'Dell <devon.odell@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hello!
>>
>> Although I probably won't be able to go unless it's close (a.k.a. in
>> the Baltimore / Washington DC area -- which actually isn't perhaps a
>> bad idea?), the subject of an IWP9 has been brought up several times
>> this year. I'd like to get the ball rolling on this, in case anybody
>> is interested in setting it up or attending. I think the question at
>> this point is, ``Who wants to organize it, and who will attend?''
>>
>> I'm perfectly fine to organize the event, and I'm sure my office could
>> more than accommodate any interested attendees. Just kind of curious
>> what timeframes people would be interested in, and whether people
>> would be able / willing to come. If not, some discussion on the when
>> and where might not be a bad idea, anyway. Let me know!
>>
>> --Devon
>>
>>
>
>



  reply	other threads:[~2009-04-24 15:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-04-24 13:54 Devon H. O'Dell
2009-04-24 14:13 ` erik quanstrom
2009-04-24 14:34   ` Devon H. O'Dell
2009-04-26  5:00   ` Jeff Sickel
2009-04-27 15:16     ` erik quanstrom
2009-04-24 14:28 ` Latchesar Ionkov
2009-04-24 15:12   ` Eric Van Hensbergen [this message]
2009-04-24 15:19     ` Devon H. O'Dell
2009-04-24 15:38       ` Eric Van Hensbergen
2009-04-24 15:41       ` Eric Van Hensbergen
2009-04-24 15:45       ` blstuart
2009-04-24 15:53         ` Joseph Stewart
2009-04-24 16:57           ` ron minnich

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=a4e6962a0904240812h3791f975h21343b480ce0615c@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=ericvh@gmail.com \
    --cc=9fans@9fans.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).