From: Fco.J.Ballesteros <nemo@plan9.escet.urjc.es>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] USB developments
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 15:56:36 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <beb087f6b5b32892960b8b9e9c51d60b@plan9.escet.urjc.es> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040115164415.I25947@cackle.proxima.alt.za>
> Or am I being utterly blind to something? I suppose what I'm
> suggesting is to streamline the kernel so the USB, PCMCIA and
> IDE/SCSI bottom halves become as close to interchangeables as
> possible. It may be overkill, but once it's done, it may turn out
> to be the type of investment that makes Plan 9 even more superior.
With enough effort put on that, I'd probably agree with you. However,
I think that would require a lot of effort to learn how to split them clearly
(consider that you'd want your kernel to be operational despite user programs
problems).
Given that, I'd vote for duplication of code. With some effort, the code
can be borrowed "as is", without keeping a different version.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-01-15 14:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-01-15 6:16 Lucio De Re
2004-01-15 8:23 ` Fco.J.Ballesteros
2004-01-15 8:42 ` Lucio De Re
2004-01-15 9:13 ` Fco.J.Ballesteros
2004-01-15 9:17 ` Fco.J.Ballesteros
2004-01-15 10:05 ` Lucio De Re
2004-01-15 10:23 ` Fco.J.Ballesteros
2004-01-15 13:02 ` Lucio De Re
2004-01-15 14:05 ` Richard Miller
2004-01-15 14:44 ` Lucio De Re
2004-01-15 14:56 ` Fco.J.Ballesteros [this message]
2004-01-15 15:20 ` Lucio De Re
2004-01-15 15:41 ` Fco.J.Ballesteros
2004-01-15 14:53 ` Fco.J.Ballesteros
2004-01-15 21:25 ` Dan Cross
2004-01-15 10:30 ` usbd - revision (Was: [9fans] USB developments) Lucio De Re
2004-01-15 10:46 ` Fco.J.Ballesteros
2004-01-15 11:47 ` Lucio De Re
2004-01-15 12:11 ` Charles Forsyth
2004-01-15 12:43 ` Lucio De Re
2004-01-15 18:01 ` C H Forsyth
2004-01-15 19:10 ` Lucio De Re
2004-01-15 20:24 ` Charles Forsyth
2004-01-15 21:00 ` Micah Stetson
2004-01-16 6:18 ` Lucio De Re
2004-01-16 7:34 ` Fco.J.Ballesteros
2004-01-16 7:38 ` Fco.J.Ballesteros
2004-01-16 7:59 ` Lucio De Re
2004-01-16 10:23 ` Bruce Ellis
2004-01-16 10:32 ` Lucio De Re
2004-01-16 10:39 ` boyd, rounin
2004-01-16 10:45 ` Richard Miller
2004-01-16 11:41 ` Bruce Ellis
2004-01-16 11:50 ` rog
2004-01-15 9:07 ` [9fans] USB developments Charles Forsyth
2004-01-15 9:18 ` Fco.J.Ballesteros
2004-01-15 10:39 ` Lucio De Re
2004-01-15 10:48 ` Richard Miller
2004-01-15 9:10 ` Richard Miller
2004-01-15 9:14 ` Fco.J.Ballesteros
2004-01-16 9:59 ` boyd, rounin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=beb087f6b5b32892960b8b9e9c51d60b@plan9.escet.urjc.es \
--to=nemo@plan9.escet.urjc.es \
--cc=9fans@cse.psu.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).