* g(1)
@ 2016-03-13 11:23 Julius Schmidt
2016-03-13 13:50 ` [9front] g(1) BurnZeZ
2016-03-13 18:35 ` sl
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Julius Schmidt @ 2016-03-13 11:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9front
Should g(1) set "rfork e"?
aiju
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [9front] g(1)
2016-03-13 11:23 g(1) Julius Schmidt
@ 2016-03-13 13:50 ` BurnZeZ
2016-03-13 18:37 ` sl
2016-03-13 18:35 ` sl
1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: BurnZeZ @ 2016-03-13 13:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9front
On Sun Mar 13 07:24:13 EDT 2016, aiju@phicode.de wrote:
> Should g(1) set "rfork e"?
/bin/psu is similarly structured and does so.
What's the rule of thumb?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [9front] g(1)
2016-03-13 11:23 g(1) Julius Schmidt
2016-03-13 13:50 ` [9front] g(1) BurnZeZ
@ 2016-03-13 18:35 ` sl
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: sl @ 2016-03-13 18:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9front
> Should g(1) set "rfork e"?
I think so, yes.
sl
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [9front] g(1)
2016-03-13 13:50 ` [9front] g(1) BurnZeZ
@ 2016-03-13 18:37 ` sl
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: sl @ 2016-03-13 18:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9front
> On Sun Mar 13 07:24:13 EDT 2016, aiju@phicode.de wrote:
>> Should g(1) set "rfork e"?
>
> /bin/psu is similarly structured and does so.
> What's the rule of thumb?
"Don't pollute the environment."
sl
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2016-03-13 18:37 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2016-03-13 11:23 g(1) Julius Schmidt
2016-03-13 13:50 ` [9front] g(1) BurnZeZ
2016-03-13 18:37 ` sl
2016-03-13 18:35 ` sl
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).