* g(1) @ 2016-03-13 11:23 Julius Schmidt 2016-03-13 13:50 ` [9front] g(1) BurnZeZ 2016-03-13 18:35 ` sl 0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: Julius Schmidt @ 2016-03-13 11:23 UTC (permalink / raw) To: 9front Should g(1) set "rfork e"? aiju ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [9front] g(1) 2016-03-13 11:23 g(1) Julius Schmidt @ 2016-03-13 13:50 ` BurnZeZ 2016-03-13 18:37 ` sl 2016-03-13 18:35 ` sl 1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: BurnZeZ @ 2016-03-13 13:50 UTC (permalink / raw) To: 9front On Sun Mar 13 07:24:13 EDT 2016, aiju@phicode.de wrote: > Should g(1) set "rfork e"? /bin/psu is similarly structured and does so. What's the rule of thumb? ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [9front] g(1) 2016-03-13 13:50 ` [9front] g(1) BurnZeZ @ 2016-03-13 18:37 ` sl 0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: sl @ 2016-03-13 18:37 UTC (permalink / raw) To: 9front > On Sun Mar 13 07:24:13 EDT 2016, aiju@phicode.de wrote: >> Should g(1) set "rfork e"? > > /bin/psu is similarly structured and does so. > What's the rule of thumb? "Don't pollute the environment." sl ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [9front] g(1) 2016-03-13 11:23 g(1) Julius Schmidt 2016-03-13 13:50 ` [9front] g(1) BurnZeZ @ 2016-03-13 18:35 ` sl 1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: sl @ 2016-03-13 18:35 UTC (permalink / raw) To: 9front > Should g(1) set "rfork e"? I think so, yes. sl ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2016-03-13 18:37 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2016-03-13 11:23 g(1) Julius Schmidt 2016-03-13 13:50 ` [9front] g(1) BurnZeZ 2016-03-13 18:37 ` sl 2016-03-13 18:35 ` sl
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).