From: "M E Leypold @ labnet" <leypold@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de>
To: Daniel de Rauglaudre <daniel.de_rauglaudre@inria.fr>
Cc: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] syntax change (was: camlp4o problem)
Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2002 09:19:16 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <15456.59140.526162.220884@hod.void.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020204190857.L2338@verdot.inria.fr>
Daniel de Rauglaudre writes:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Feb 04, 2002 at 06:46:38PM +0100, Markus Mottl wrote:
>
> > I am just asking whether the OCaml-team considers major syntax
> > improvements in their development strategy at all.
>
> No.
Well, that's a relief. I really had been getting slightly nervous
because of this thread. I really prefer the 'old' syntax, though I see
the merits of the new syntax when it comes to defining syntax
extensions. Too much parentheses in the revised sysntax if you ask me.
And as far as I see it, ocamlp4 is really a great tool, if I ever
consider experimenting with a new syntax.
Regards -- Markus
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-08-08 22:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-02-02 0:12 [Caml-list] otags problem Shivkumar Chandrasekaran
2002-02-04 14:11 ` [Caml-list] camlp4o problem (was: otags problem) Hendrik Tews
2002-02-04 14:52 ` Daniel de Rauglaudre
2002-02-04 15:08 ` Markus Mottl
2002-02-04 15:41 ` Daniel de Rauglaudre
2002-02-04 15:57 ` Christophe Raffalli
2002-02-04 17:06 ` Daniel de Rauglaudre
2002-02-04 16:25 ` [Caml-list] syntax change (was: camlp4o problem) Markus Mottl
2002-02-04 17:01 ` Daniel de Rauglaudre
2002-02-04 17:46 ` Markus Mottl
2002-02-04 18:08 ` Daniel de Rauglaudre
2002-02-06 8:19 ` M E Leypold @ labnet [this message]
2002-02-04 18:28 ` Mattias Waldau
2002-02-04 20:11 ` Markus Mottl
2002-02-04 22:52 ` Chris Hecker
2002-02-04 23:04 ` Benjamin C. Pierce
2002-02-04 23:28 ` Markus Mottl
2002-02-04 23:20 ` Markus Mottl
2002-02-05 2:39 ` Daniel de Rauglaudre
2002-02-05 2:55 ` Chris Hecker
2002-02-05 2:01 ` Brian Rogoff
2002-02-05 10:33 ` Markus Mottl
2002-02-05 11:53 ` Remi VANICAT
2002-02-05 12:05 ` Daniel de Rauglaudre
2002-02-05 17:23 ` Stefano Zacchiroli
2002-02-22 10:15 ` [Caml-list] Emacs mode for revised syntax? Johan Georg Granström
2002-02-22 10:21 ` Christian Gillot
2002-02-06 8:23 ` [Caml-list] syntax change (was: camlp4o problem) M E Leypold @ labnet
2002-02-04 23:04 ` Chris Hecker
2002-02-05 2:47 ` Daniel de Rauglaudre
2002-02-05 2:59 ` Chris Hecker
2002-02-05 8:42 ` Daniel de Rauglaudre
2002-02-05 9:09 ` [Caml-list] LL, LR, and camlp4 (was Re: syntax change) Chris Hecker
2002-02-05 9:31 ` Daniel de Rauglaudre
2002-02-05 9:33 ` Xavier Leroy
2002-02-05 12:17 ` Diego olivier FERNANDEZ PONS
2002-02-05 3:40 ` [Caml-list] camlp4o problem (was: otags problem) Patrick M Doane
2002-02-05 8:57 ` Daniel de Rauglaudre
2002-02-06 4:00 ` Patrick M Doane
2002-02-05 15:08 ` Hendrik Tews
2002-02-05 16:13 ` Daniel de Rauglaudre
2002-02-06 19:17 ` Yaron M. Minsky
2002-02-06 20:02 ` [Caml-list] Re: bug (was: camlp4o problem) Daniel de Rauglaudre
2002-02-04 22:15 ` [Caml-list] camlp4o problem (was: otags problem) Shivkumar Chandrasekaran
2002-02-05 2:49 [Caml-list] syntax change (was: camlp4o problem) Arturo Borquez
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=15456.59140.526162.220884@hod.void.org \
--to=leypold@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
--cc=daniel.de_rauglaudre@inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).