caml-list - the Caml user's mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chris Hecker <checker@d6.com>
To: Daniel de Rauglaudre <daniel.de_rauglaudre@inria.fr>, caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] syntax change (was: camlp4o problem)
Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2002 18:55:40 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4.3.2.7.2.20020204185309.00cf3240@arda.pair.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020205033933.A23010@verdot.inria.fr>


>> I think you rarely get a chance to change major things, and so you
>> should take the opportunity before it's too late.
>Which opportunity? I don't see any opportunity now.

"Opportunity" is a relative thing.  Selling Enron at $30 seemed dumb relative to $90, but it sure seems like a missed opportunity now.  :)

Similarly, Caml is still relatively small.  I think it will get much bigger.  This will seem like a missed opportunity in the future (assuming anybody actually wants to change the syntax in the future).

>I don't think that you, users, must wait for us, the caml team, to
>change the syntax. The standard syntax will never change in our side,
>you can be sure of that.

Well, then that's that.  ;)

Chris


-------------------
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs  FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr  Archives: http://caml.inria.fr


  reply	other threads:[~2002-02-05  2:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-02-02  0:12 [Caml-list] otags problem Shivkumar Chandrasekaran
2002-02-04 14:11 ` [Caml-list] camlp4o problem (was: otags problem) Hendrik Tews
2002-02-04 14:52   ` Daniel de Rauglaudre
2002-02-04 15:08     ` Markus Mottl
2002-02-04 15:41       ` Daniel de Rauglaudre
2002-02-04 15:57         ` Christophe Raffalli
2002-02-04 17:06           ` Daniel de Rauglaudre
2002-02-04 16:25         ` [Caml-list] syntax change (was: camlp4o problem) Markus Mottl
2002-02-04 17:01           ` Daniel de Rauglaudre
2002-02-04 17:46             ` Markus Mottl
2002-02-04 18:08               ` Daniel de Rauglaudre
2002-02-06  8:19                 ` M E Leypold @ labnet
2002-02-04 18:28             ` Mattias Waldau
2002-02-04 20:11               ` Markus Mottl
2002-02-04 22:52                 ` Chris Hecker
2002-02-04 23:04                   ` Benjamin C. Pierce
2002-02-04 23:28                     ` Markus Mottl
2002-02-04 23:20                   ` Markus Mottl
2002-02-05  2:39                   ` Daniel de Rauglaudre
2002-02-05  2:55                     ` Chris Hecker [this message]
2002-02-05  2:01                 ` Brian Rogoff
2002-02-05 10:33                   ` Markus Mottl
2002-02-05 11:53                     ` Remi VANICAT
2002-02-05 12:05                       ` Daniel de Rauglaudre
2002-02-05 17:23                       ` Stefano Zacchiroli
2002-02-22 10:15                       ` [Caml-list] Emacs mode for revised syntax? Johan Georg Granström
2002-02-22 10:21                         ` Christian Gillot
2002-02-06  8:23                 ` [Caml-list] syntax change (was: camlp4o problem) M E Leypold @ labnet
2002-02-04 23:04           ` Chris Hecker
2002-02-05  2:47             ` Daniel de Rauglaudre
2002-02-05  2:59               ` Chris Hecker
2002-02-05  8:42                 ` Daniel de Rauglaudre
2002-02-05  9:09                   ` [Caml-list] LL, LR, and camlp4 (was Re: syntax change) Chris Hecker
2002-02-05  9:31                     ` Daniel de Rauglaudre
2002-02-05  9:33                     ` Xavier Leroy
2002-02-05 12:17                       ` Diego olivier FERNANDEZ PONS
2002-02-05  3:40     ` [Caml-list] camlp4o problem (was: otags problem) Patrick M Doane
2002-02-05  8:57       ` Daniel de Rauglaudre
2002-02-06  4:00         ` Patrick M Doane
2002-02-05 15:08     ` Hendrik Tews
2002-02-05 16:13       ` Daniel de Rauglaudre
2002-02-06 19:17         ` Yaron M. Minsky
2002-02-06 20:02           ` [Caml-list] Re: bug (was: camlp4o problem) Daniel de Rauglaudre
2002-02-04 22:15   ` [Caml-list] camlp4o problem (was: otags problem) Shivkumar Chandrasekaran
2002-02-05  2:49 [Caml-list] syntax change (was: camlp4o problem) Arturo Borquez

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4.3.2.7.2.20020204185309.00cf3240@arda.pair.com \
    --to=checker@d6.com \
    --cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
    --cc=daniel.de_rauglaudre@inria.fr \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).