From: Stefano Zacchiroli <zack@cs.unibo.it>
To: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Camlp4 pretty print comments
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 15:18:38 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20021022131838.GB23724@cs.unibo.it> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20021022131530.A3558@verdot.inria.fr>
On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 01:15:30PM +0200, Daniel de Rauglaudre wrote:
> Because comments are not represented in the syntax tree. To pretty
> print, Camlp4 reads the file again, using the locations inside the
> syntax tree to determine where the comments are located.
Why comments are not represented? It's because the lexer don't return
them or because the standard ocaml grammar rules skip them?
If the first case does apply, is possible to add a camlp4 rule to
retain them, right?
BTW, does ocamldoc use the same trick (reading twice)?
TIA,
Cheers.
--
Stefano Zacchiroli - undergraduate student of CS @ Univ. Bologna, Italy
zack@cs.unibo.it | ICQ# 33538863 | http://www.cs.unibo.it/~zacchiro
"I know you believe you understood what you think I said, but I am not
sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant!" -- G.Romney
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-10-22 13:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-10-18 20:16 [Caml-list] Possible bug in module and class? Bow-Yaw Wang
2002-10-21 6:26 ` Jacques Garrigue
2002-10-21 12:16 ` Alessandro Baretta
2002-10-21 12:32 ` Luc Maranget
2002-10-21 12:51 ` Alessandro Baretta
2002-10-22 2:16 ` Jacques Garrigue
2002-10-22 4:35 ` [Caml-list] Camlp4 pretty print comments Quetzalcoatl Bradley
2002-10-22 11:15 ` Daniel de Rauglaudre
2002-10-22 12:40 ` Sven Luther
2002-10-22 13:18 ` Stefano Zacchiroli [this message]
2002-10-22 13:44 ` Maxence Guesdon
2002-10-22 14:21 ` Daniel de Rauglaudre
2002-10-21 21:00 ` [Caml-list] Possible bug in module and class? Bow-Yaw Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20021022131838.GB23724@cs.unibo.it \
--to=zack@cs.unibo.it \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).