From: Alessandro Baretta <alex@baretta.com>
To: Ocaml <caml-list@inria.fr>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Possible bug in module and class?
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 14:16:43 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3DB3F02B.6070401@baretta.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20021021152606F.garrigue@kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp>
Jacques Garrigue wrote:
> Since already a number of bugs have been fixed since 3.06,
> and it might be hard to extract just the needed patch for your
> problem, I'm afraid you will have to get the cvs version
> from camlcvs.inria.fr.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Jacques Garrigue
This brings about an interesting problem, which I would like
the developers to comment on.
I'm using O'Caml in an industrial project. Of course, I'd
like to make sure that I give my customers the most stable
environment possible. As more and more bugs are found and
fixed in the CVS version, the temptation to upgrade from the
official distribution becomes stronger. But is the CVS
version usually more or less buggy than the official distro?
I know this is a very diffucult question, and that it is
much easier to answer, "Try and it, and if you find a bug,
report it." Yet, I would like the developers to take a stand
on the use of the cvs source. Do you encourage widespread
use? Do you encourage use only for testing purposes?
I ask because I would like to stick with official
reccomendations, rather than experimenting on completely
unknown grounds.
TIA
Alex
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-10-21 12:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-10-18 20:16 Bow-Yaw Wang
2002-10-21 6:26 ` Jacques Garrigue
2002-10-21 12:16 ` Alessandro Baretta [this message]
2002-10-21 12:32 ` Luc Maranget
2002-10-21 12:51 ` Alessandro Baretta
2002-10-22 2:16 ` Jacques Garrigue
2002-10-22 4:35 ` [Caml-list] Camlp4 pretty print comments Quetzalcoatl Bradley
2002-10-22 11:15 ` Daniel de Rauglaudre
2002-10-22 12:40 ` Sven Luther
2002-10-22 13:18 ` Stefano Zacchiroli
2002-10-22 13:44 ` Maxence Guesdon
2002-10-22 14:21 ` Daniel de Rauglaudre
2002-10-21 21:00 ` [Caml-list] Possible bug in module and class? Bow-Yaw Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3DB3F02B.6070401@baretta.com \
--to=alex@baretta.com \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).