From: Alessandro Baretta <alex@baretta.com>
To: Luc Maranget <luc.maranget@inria.fr>, Ocaml <caml-list@inria.fr>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Possible bug in module and class?
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 14:51:16 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3DB3F844.1040906@baretta.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200210211232.OAA0000007363@beaune.inria.fr>
Luc Maranget wrote:
>
> I am no industrial.
>
> But for hevea I stick to the following guidelines.
>
> - Always develop with the current distributed version.
> - Avoid new features as much as possible.
> - I check hevea at every compiler release.
> - I case of bug I favor work-arounds in my code over enforcing upgrade (at
> least until the next official Ocaml release).
>
> I do not think my statement can be considered ``official'', just
> common sense.
This is more or less what I've been doing up to now. Yet,
the CVS version, is still tempting, in some respects. I'm am
considering running a double installation setup with the
official distro in /usr/bin and /usr/lib and the cvs in
/opt/bin and /opt/lib. I could then test my code againsta
the CVS snapshot by simply using a pinch of makefile magic.
The bottom line is that I don't like to work-arounds in my
code. I'd like my code to be as obvious and idiomatic as
possible.
Alex
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-10-21 12:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-10-18 20:16 Bow-Yaw Wang
2002-10-21 6:26 ` Jacques Garrigue
2002-10-21 12:16 ` Alessandro Baretta
2002-10-21 12:32 ` Luc Maranget
2002-10-21 12:51 ` Alessandro Baretta [this message]
2002-10-22 2:16 ` Jacques Garrigue
2002-10-22 4:35 ` [Caml-list] Camlp4 pretty print comments Quetzalcoatl Bradley
2002-10-22 11:15 ` Daniel de Rauglaudre
2002-10-22 12:40 ` Sven Luther
2002-10-22 13:18 ` Stefano Zacchiroli
2002-10-22 13:44 ` Maxence Guesdon
2002-10-22 14:21 ` Daniel de Rauglaudre
2002-10-21 21:00 ` [Caml-list] Possible bug in module and class? Bow-Yaw Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3DB3F844.1040906@baretta.com \
--to=alex@baretta.com \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
--cc=luc.maranget@inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).