caml-list - the Caml user's mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: John Max Skaller <skaller@ozemail.com.au>
To: "'caml-list@inria.fr'" <caml-list@inria.fr>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] ocaml and large development projects
Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2003 08:42:32 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3EDBD2D8.9000508@ozemail.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4.3.2.7.2.20030519120753.04545700@localhost>

Chris Hecker wrote:


>> Maybe.  C++ and Java are toy languages, then.
> 
> 
> This statement plays well on a mailing list for an alternative language, 
> but the reality is fairly different and most people writing large 

> software in C++ would write you off as a loon if you said this to them.  


	With due respect: most software houses emply
smart people that know no computer science. One can blame
universities for not teaching it I suppose.

	These software houses insist on using bad tools
all the time, they insist on using engineering methodology
entirely inappropriate for software development, they DARE
to rant and rave about how good object orientation is, and then
organise their people in heirarchical teams.

	Basically, they're total morons on an organisational
level, even if the individiuals are quite smart.

	Unfortunately one must cry, that these people
are well paid to rip off investors, consumers, taxpayers,
and just about everyone else. Most haven't even heard
of functional programming.

	In other words, their opinion about
separate compilation just doesn't count for anything
in my books: why would I listen to some idiot that
thinks Java is a good language?


	In my opinion, the major weakness of
Ocaml industrially is that one cannot currently generate
shared libraries. (Interfacing with C/C++ is also problematic
but possible).

	The reason is that the modern separate
compilation model *enforced* my operating system
technology, and used extensively for large scale projects,
is not separate compilation and static linkage into a program,
but building of shared libraries: Ocaml(opt) is targetting the wrong
kind of object, no one is interested in programs these days
(they're built with scripting languages). They're interested
in reusable binary components.

	I can't argue if this is right or wrong, but it
is a fact that that is what people need to build.
The Ocaml team surely knows this and is working towards
implementing it (witness preparatory work on linking
C parts of Ocaml as shared libraries).

-- 
John Max Skaller, mailto:skaller@ozemail.com.au
snail:10/1 Toxteth Rd, Glebe, NSW 2037, Australia.
voice:61-2-9660-0850


-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners


  parent reply	other threads:[~2003-06-02 22:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 63+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <ocaml@tagger.yapper.org>
2003-03-31 16:51 ` [Caml-list] How can I check for the use of polymorphic equality? Neel Krishnaswami
2003-03-31 17:33   ` brogoff
2003-04-03 19:44   ` Jason Hickey
2003-04-03 20:40     ` Pierre Weis
2003-04-03 20:53       ` Chris Hecker
2003-04-04  8:46         ` Pierre Weis
2003-04-04 19:05           ` Jason Hickey
2003-04-04  9:10         ` Andreas Rossberg
2003-05-14 11:43 ` [Caml-list] ocaml and large development projects Traudt, Mark
2003-05-14 15:52   ` Jason Hickey
2003-05-18  5:32     ` Chris Hecker
2003-05-18  5:44       ` David Brown
2003-05-18  6:10         ` Chris Hecker
2003-05-18 11:13           ` John Carr
2003-05-18 16:51             ` Ed L Cashin
2003-05-18 18:08               ` Lex Stein
2003-05-18 19:08                 ` Ed L Cashin
2003-05-18 19:55                   ` Lex Stein
2003-05-19  8:13                   ` Markus Mottl
2003-05-19  8:33                     ` Nicolas Cannasse
2003-06-02 21:59                     ` John Max Skaller
2003-05-18 23:19                 ` Chris Hecker
2003-05-18 14:38           ` David Brown
2003-05-18 16:00             ` Ville-Pertti Keinonen
2003-05-19 15:36           ` Brian Hurt
2003-05-19 19:31             ` Chris Hecker
2003-05-19 23:39               ` Seth Kurtzberg
2003-05-20  8:07               ` [Caml-list] ocaml as *.so (was: ...and large development projects) Wolfgang Müller
2003-05-20  8:42                 ` [Caml-list] Reading a file Siegfried Gonzi
2003-05-20 10:21                   ` Mattias Waldau
2003-05-20 10:48                   ` Nicolas Cannasse
2003-05-20 10:55                   ` Markus Mottl
2003-05-20 13:20                   ` Michal Moskal
2003-05-20 12:21                     ` Siegfried Gonzi
2003-05-21  6:11                     ` Siegfried Gonzi
2003-05-21  6:48                       ` Siegfried Gonzi
2003-05-21  6:53                         ` Siegfried Gonzi
2003-05-21  9:16                           ` Markus Mottl
2003-05-21 10:04                             ` Eray Ozkural
2003-05-21 16:20                               ` brogoff
2003-05-21  8:21                       ` Michal Moskal
2003-05-21  7:24                         ` [Caml-list] PsiLAB works fine under Linux SuSE 8 Siegfried Gonzi
2003-05-21  9:11                       ` [Caml-list] Reading a file Markus Mottl
2003-05-22  6:27                         ` Siegfried Gonzi
2003-05-22 10:26                           ` Markus Mottl
2003-05-23  5:59                             ` Siegfried Gonzi
2003-05-23  6:04                               ` Siegfried Gonzi
2003-05-20 10:45                 ` [Caml-list] ocaml as *.so (was: ...and large development projects) Nicolas Cannasse
2003-05-20 11:17                   ` Wolfgang Müller
2003-05-20 11:31                     ` Nicolas Cannasse
2003-05-20 11:40                       ` Wolfgang Müller
2003-06-02 22:40                 ` John Max Skaller
2003-06-03 13:26                   ` [Caml-list] ocaml as *.so Remi Vanicat
2003-06-02 22:42               ` John Max Skaller [this message]
2003-06-02 21:24           ` [Caml-list] ocaml and large development projects John Max Skaller
2003-06-02 21:12       ` John Max Skaller
2003-06-03  0:31         ` Chris Hecker
2003-06-03 10:13           ` Michal Moskal
2003-06-03 18:12             ` Chris Hecker
2003-06-03 14:31           ` art yerkes
2003-06-03 21:55           ` Jason Hickey
2003-06-03 22:42             ` Chris Hecker
2003-06-06 23:46             ` John Max Skaller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3EDBD2D8.9000508@ozemail.com.au \
    --to=skaller@ozemail.com.au \
    --cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).