caml-list - the Caml user's mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eray Ozkural <examachine@gmail.com>
To: Alexy Khrabrov <deliverable@gmail.com>
Cc: Caml List <caml-list@inria.fr>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Efficient OCaml multicore -- roadmap?
Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2011 20:39:01 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <BANLkTikHp1yu5fEuLf-=d_cMsshAcpFP5g@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <97D08229-2871-42F1-A50D-8E85C6C2BE31@gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2067 bytes --]

On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 4:47 PM, Alexy Khrabrov <deliverable@gmail.com>wrote:

>
> On Apr 23, 2011, at 6:17 AM, Eray Ozkural wrote:
>
> > I don't really care what others say, but to prove that this has any
> performance value you should do the following:
> >
> >
> > Compare your most "parallel" algorithm with the performance of a
> corresponding well-written MPI application using openmpi's shared memory
> transport. If there is a difference, then your system has some value.
> >
> > Of course openmpi's shared memory transport is terribly buggy, but it
> should give a baseline acceptable performance.
> >
> > If there is no comparison, we have no idea.
>
> The problem with "implement in MPI and compare" is that you have to
> rearchitect a sequential program for a totally different model.  By
> contrast, using shared memory parallelism, it's often a question of using
> pmap.
>

Incorrect. We always compare to sequential code in parallel computing. It's
called "speedup".

And doubly incorrect because we are not comparing to sequential code but a
claimed shared memory parallelism. It's only logical to compare two
approaches on the same hardware.


>
> I really recommend everybody interested in parallelism to learn and try
> Clojure on a small problem.  You can replace a single map by pmap in a
> suitable setting and observe a not-quite-linear, but proportional speedup.
>

Of course functional programming fits such parallelism very well. It's a
shame that ocaml does not have parallel functional primitives.


>
> I'd be really happy if OCaml gets the mechanisms from Clojure.



It'd be even better if such explicit parallelism had good compiler support,
too :) I don't know much about Clojure, but I wouldn't use anything that
runs on JVM for a parallel program. That might be like first turning your
computer to Commodore 64 and then getting some speedup.


Best,


-- 
Eray Ozkural, PhD candidate.  Comp. Sci. Dept., Bilkent University, Ankara
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ai-philosophy
http://myspace.com/arizanesil http://myspace.com/malfunct

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 3034 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2011-04-23 17:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 74+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <2054357367.219171.1300974318806.JavaMail.root@zmbs4.inria.fr>
2011-03-24 23:13 ` Fabrice Le Fessant
2011-03-25  0:23   ` [Caml-list] " Sylvain Le Gall
2011-03-25  9:55   ` [Caml-list] " Alain Frisch
2011-03-25 11:44     ` Gerd Stolpmann
     [not found]   ` <1396338209.232813.1301046980856.JavaMail.root@zmbs4.inria.fr>
2011-03-25 10:23     ` Fabrice Le Fessant
2011-03-25 12:07       ` Gerd Stolpmann
2011-04-16 12:12         ` Jon Harrop
2011-03-25 10:51   ` Hugo Ferreira
2011-03-25 12:25     ` Gerd Stolpmann
2011-03-25 12:58       ` Hugo Ferreira
     [not found]       ` <341494683.237537.1301057887481.JavaMail.root@zmbs4.inria.fr>
2011-03-25 13:10         ` Fabrice Le Fessant
2011-03-25 13:41           ` Dario Teixeira
2011-03-30 18:12             ` Jon Harrop
2011-03-25 15:44           ` Hugo Ferreira
2011-03-25 18:24             ` Martin Jambon
2011-03-25 19:19               ` Hugo Ferreira
2011-03-25 20:26                 ` Gerd Stolpmann
2011-03-26  9:11                   ` Hugo Ferreira
2011-03-26 10:31                   ` Richard W.M. Jones
2011-03-30 16:56                     ` Jon Harrop
2011-03-30 19:24                       ` Richard W.M. Jones
2011-04-20 21:44                   ` Jon Harrop
2011-04-19  9:57                 ` Eray Ozkural
2011-04-19 10:05                   ` Hugo Ferreira
2011-04-19 20:26                   ` Gerd Stolpmann
2011-04-20  7:59                     ` Hugo Ferreira
2011-04-20 12:30                       ` Markus Mottl
2011-04-20 12:53                         ` Hugo Ferreira
2011-04-20 13:22                           ` Markus Mottl
2011-04-20 14:00                       ` Edgar Friendly
2011-04-19 22:49                 ` Jon Harrop
2011-03-30 17:02               ` Jon Harrop
2011-04-20 19:23               ` Jon Harrop
2011-04-20 20:05                 ` Alexy Khrabrov
2011-04-20 23:00                   ` Jon Harrop
     [not found]                   ` <76544177.594058.1303341821437.JavaMail.root@zmbs4.inria.fr>
2011-04-21  7:48                     ` Fabrice Le Fessant
2011-04-21  8:35                       ` Hugo Ferreira
2011-04-23 17:32                         ` Jon Harrop
2011-04-21  9:09                       ` Alain Frisch
     [not found]                         ` <799994864.610698.1303412613509.JavaMail.root@zmbs4.inria.fr>
2011-04-22  8:06                           ` Fabrice Le Fessant
2011-04-22  9:11                             ` Gerd Stolpmann
2011-04-23 10:17                               ` Eray Ozkural
2011-04-23 13:47                                 ` Alexy Khrabrov
2011-04-23 17:39                                   ` Eray Ozkural [this message]
2011-04-23 20:18                                     ` Alexy Khrabrov
2011-04-23 21:18                                       ` Jon Harrop
2011-04-24  0:33                                       ` Eray Ozkural
2011-04-28 14:42                                         ` orbitz
2011-04-23 19:02                                 ` Jon Harrop
2011-04-22  9:44                             ` Vincent Aravantinos
     [not found]                         ` <20110421.210304.1267840107736400776.Christophe.Troestler+ocaml@umons.ac.be>
2011-04-21 19:53                           ` Hezekiah M. Carty
2011-04-22  8:34                           ` Alain Frisch
2011-04-21 10:09                       ` Philippe Strauss
2011-04-23 17:44                         ` Jon Harrop
2011-04-23 17:05                       ` Jon Harrop
2011-04-20 20:30                 ` Gerd Stolpmann
2011-04-20 23:33                   ` Jon Harrop
2011-03-25 20:27             ` Philippe Strauss
2011-04-19 22:47           ` Jon Harrop
     [not found]           ` <869445701.579183.1303253283515.JavaMail.root@zmbs4.inria.fr>
2011-04-20  9:25             ` Fabrice Le Fessant
2011-03-25 18:45   ` Andrei Formiga
2011-03-30 17:00     ` Jon Harrop
2011-04-13  3:36   ` Lucas Dixon
2011-04-13 13:01     ` Gerd Stolpmann
2011-04-13 13:09       ` Lucas Dixon
2011-04-13 23:04       ` Goswin von Brederlow
2011-04-16 13:54     ` Jon Harrop
2011-03-24 13:44 Alexy Khrabrov
2011-03-24 14:57 ` Gerd Stolpmann
2011-03-24 15:03   ` Joel Reymont
2011-03-24 15:28     ` Guillaume Yziquel
2011-03-24 15:48       ` Gerd Stolpmann
2011-03-24 15:38     ` Gerd Stolpmann
2011-03-25 19:49   ` Richard W.M. Jones

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='BANLkTikHp1yu5fEuLf-=d_cMsshAcpFP5g@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=examachine@gmail.com \
    --cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
    --cc=deliverable@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).