From: John J Lee <jjl@pobox.com>
To: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Executable size?
Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2003 15:01:26 +0000 (GMT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0311151457531.5150@alice> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1068903416.25869.96.camel@pelican>
On Sat, 16 Nov 2003, skaller wrote:
[...]
> A very large number of people do in fact build C all the
> time without any runtime library at all: embedded systems
> typically don't use any runtime.
When you say "runtime", do you mean stuff like libc.so, or libgcc.a, or
both?
When, if ever, can you avoid linking with libgcc.a (or its equivalent)?
What do you lose by not linking with it?
I don't ask for any practical reason, just to try and sort out how O'Caml,
C and C++ differ here.
> You can also do this for C++, even g++ can do it I think
> by turning off support for features that require run
> time support such as exception handling.
>
> Ocaml on the other hand cannot function at all without the gc.
John
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-11-15 15:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-11-12 16:14 John J Lee
2003-11-12 17:33 ` Richard Jones
2003-11-12 18:06 ` Dustin Sallings
2003-11-12 18:31 ` Sven Luther
2003-11-12 18:50 ` John J Lee
2003-11-13 9:10 ` Sven Luther
2003-11-13 13:46 ` John J Lee
2003-11-13 14:28 ` Sven Luther
2003-11-12 18:21 ` John J Lee
2003-11-12 22:53 ` Richard Jones
2003-11-12 23:50 ` John J Lee
2003-11-15 12:48 ` skaller
2003-11-15 15:25 ` John J Lee
2003-11-12 19:06 ` Brian Hurt
2003-11-12 18:38 ` Sven Luther
2003-11-12 19:04 ` Karl Zilles
2003-11-12 21:29 ` Brian Hurt
2003-11-12 20:03 ` Brian Hurt
2003-11-13 4:14 ` Kamil Shakirov
2003-11-13 9:06 ` Richard Jones
2003-11-13 9:18 ` Sven Luther
2003-11-12 18:46 ` John J Lee
2003-11-12 20:40 ` Brian Hurt
2003-11-12 20:10 ` Basile Starynkevitch
2003-11-12 20:35 ` John J Lee
2003-11-12 21:51 ` Brian Hurt
2003-11-12 21:35 ` David Brown
2003-11-12 22:12 ` Eric Dahlman
2003-11-12 23:32 ` Brian Hurt
2003-11-12 22:53 ` Eric Dahlman
2003-11-12 23:35 ` John J Lee
2003-11-12 23:44 ` John J Lee
2003-11-13 0:26 ` Karl Zilles
2003-11-13 1:29 ` [Caml-list] F-sharp (was: Executable size?) Oleg Trott
2003-11-14 6:04 ` [Caml-list] float_of_num Christophe Raffalli
2003-11-13 15:43 ` [Caml-list] Executable size? Eric Dahlman
2003-11-13 19:58 ` John J Lee
2003-11-13 20:36 ` Eric Dahlman
2003-11-13 22:16 ` John J Lee
2003-11-15 13:41 ` skaller
2003-11-15 15:13 ` John J Lee
2003-11-15 18:07 ` skaller
2003-11-15 13:36 ` skaller
2003-11-15 15:01 ` John J Lee [this message]
2003-11-15 17:53 ` skaller
2003-11-13 13:37 ` Florian Hars
2003-11-12 18:05 ` Dustin Sallings
2003-11-12 18:36 ` John J Lee
2003-11-12 19:04 ` Dustin Sallings
2003-11-12 20:17 ` John J Lee
2003-11-12 20:01 ` Vitaly Lugovsky
2003-11-13 1:23 ` Nicolas Cannasse
2003-11-15 12:09 ` skaller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.58.0311151457531.5150@alice \
--to=jjl@pobox.com \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).