categories - Category Theory list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: John Baez <john.c.baez@gmail.com>
To: "categories@mta.ca" <categories@mta.ca>
Subject: Re: A well kept secret?
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 21:12:53 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <E1NKgtk-0004qj-QX@mailserv.mta.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E1NKMzO-0001f7-JT@mailserv.mta.ca>

Andrew Stacey wrote:

> All this discussion about a "well kept secret" has gone
> a bit over my head.  I'm not sure what the secret is!

We could tell you...

... but then it wouldn't be a secret, now, would it?

Seriously, I think the so-called "secret" is the power and glory of
category theory.  And I think some of the older category theorists on
this mailing list have a different attitude than youngsters like you
and me.  They fought to convince the world that category theory was
worthwhile. Some feel they lost that fight.  We came along later and
are a bit puzzled by that attitude: if you look around at the
landscape of mathematics today, categories are everywhere!  From
Grothendieck to Voevodsky to Lurie, etc., much of the most exciting
mathematics of our era would be inconceivable without categories.

I don't think I'll try to tell you the old war stories: others are
better qualified.  But I hope the veterans of those wars take heed of
your comments and realize many young mathematicians naturally find
categories interesting,  exciting, and/or useful.  Certainly there is
much about categories that these youngsters don't understand.  But
they can learn it if you explain it.`

Best,
jb


[For admin and other information see: http://www.mta.ca/~cat-dist/ ]


  reply	other threads:[~2009-12-15  5:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-12-09  7:40 Ronnie Brown
2009-12-14 18:41 ` Andrew Stacey
2009-12-15  5:12   ` John Baez [this message]
2009-12-15 20:14   ` A well kept secret Joyal, André
2009-12-16 13:08     ` RE : categories: " Joyal, André
     [not found]     ` <B3C24EA955FF0C4EA14658997CD3E25E2159B684@CAHIER.gst.uqam.ca>
2009-12-17 18:58       ` a conjecture Joyal, André
2009-12-17  5:08   ` A well kept secret? Ross Street
2009-12-17 23:30 peasthope
2009-12-18  4:09 ` John Baez
2009-12-18 22:25   ` Ellis D. Cooper
2009-12-19 17:45     ` Ronnie Brown
2009-12-19 22:16     ` John Baez
2009-12-20 22:52       ` Greg Meredith
2009-12-21 15:46       ` Zinovy Diskin
2009-12-22 16:59         ` zoran skoda
2009-12-23  1:53       ` Tom Leinster
2009-12-23 14:15         ` Colin McLarty
2009-12-20 21:50     ` jim stasheff
     [not found]     ` <d4da910b0912220859q3858b68am4e58749f21ce839d@mail.gmail.com>
2009-12-23  4:31       ` Zinovy Diskin
2009-12-23 14:35         ` Ronnie Brown
     [not found]     ` <4B322ACA.50202@btinternet.com>
2009-12-25 20:06       ` Zinovy Diskin
2009-12-20 17:50   ` Joyal, André
2009-12-18 10:48 ` KCHM
2009-12-19 20:55   ` Vaughan Pratt
2009-12-20  1:00 Larry Harper
2009-12-20 14:38 ` Colin McLarty
2009-12-20 17:47 ` jim stasheff

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=E1NKgtk-0004qj-QX@mailserv.mta.ca \
    --to=john.c.baez@gmail.com \
    --cc=categories@mta.ca \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).