From: Tom Leinster <tl@maths.gla.ac.uk>
To: categories@mta.ca
Subject: Re: A well kept secret?
Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 01:53:30 +0000 (GMT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.00.0912230135490.31758@taylor.maths.gla.ac.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E1NMMY2-0001CZ-OA@mailserv.mta.ca>
Those depressed about the social status of category theory might be
cheered up by a look at Math Overflow, http://mathoverflow.net .
This is a website where you can ask and answer questions about any part of
mathematics. You might expect that for a site with this problem-solving
format, category theory wouldn't be much in evidence. But according to
the site's own statistics, it's the 3rd most popular topic for questions.
The site's been up only a few months but has been enormously successful,
with some extremely clever and knowledgeable people contributing
regularly. It really doesn't seem like a pro-category niche group. But
I've seen little or no anti-category sniping there. The kind of cynicism
that most of us have experienced just isn't in evidence.
A particular reason to find this cheering is that the demographic of the
contributors is skewed towards the young, the American, and the algebraic
geometers. (Young American algebraic geometers are a definite minority,
though - there's quite a wide spread.) Why might that be particularly
cheering? "Young" because it suggests a bright future, "American"
because, as I gather, the NSF has historically been loath to support
category theory, and "algebraic geometers" because it suggests that the
anti-category theory backlash in that influential subject may be nearing
an end.
Best wishes,
Tom
[For admin and other information see: http://www.mta.ca/~cat-dist/ ]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-12-23 1:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-12-17 23:30 peasthope
2009-12-18 4:09 ` John Baez
2009-12-18 22:25 ` Ellis D. Cooper
2009-12-19 17:45 ` Ronnie Brown
2009-12-19 22:16 ` John Baez
2009-12-20 22:52 ` Greg Meredith
2009-12-21 15:46 ` Zinovy Diskin
2009-12-22 16:59 ` zoran skoda
2009-12-23 1:53 ` Tom Leinster [this message]
2009-12-23 14:15 ` Colin McLarty
2009-12-23 19:10 ` CatLab Joyal, André
2009-12-20 21:50 ` A well kept secret? jim stasheff
[not found] ` <d4da910b0912220859q3858b68am4e58749f21ce839d@mail.gmail.com>
2009-12-23 4:31 ` Zinovy Diskin
2009-12-23 14:35 ` Ronnie Brown
[not found] ` <4B322ACA.50202@btinternet.com>
2009-12-25 20:06 ` Zinovy Diskin
2009-12-20 17:50 ` Joyal, André
[not found] ` <B3C24EA955FF0C4EA14658997CD3E25E2159B6AA@CAHIER.gst.uqam.ca>
2009-12-21 8:43 ` additions Joyal, André
2009-12-21 14:16 ` additions Bob Coecke
2009-12-22 2:24 ` additions Joyal, André
2009-12-23 20:51 ` additions Thorsten Altenkirch
2009-12-24 23:55 ` additions Dusko Pavlovic
2009-12-26 2:14 ` additions Peter Selinger
[not found] ` <B3C24EA955FF0C4EA14658997CD3E25E370F5626@CAHIER.gst.uqam.ca>
[not found] ` <B3C24EA955FF0C4EA14658997CD3E25E370F5636@CAHIER.gst.uqam.ca>
[not found] ` <B3C24EA955FF0C4EA14658997CD3E25E370F5638@CAHIER.gst.uqam.ca>
2009-12-28 17:54 ` quantum information and foundation Joyal, André
2009-12-29 12:13 ` Urs Schreiber
2009-12-29 15:55 ` zoran skoda
2009-12-22 0:39 ` additions Mike Stay
2009-12-23 11:19 ` additions Steve Vickers
2009-12-23 18:06 ` additions Mike Stay
2009-12-24 13:12 ` additions Carsten Führmann
2009-12-24 19:23 ` additions Dusko Pavlovic
2009-12-23 19:06 ` additions Thorsten Altenkirch
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.64.0912211413340.15997@msr03.math.mcgill.ca>
[not found] ` <B3C24EA955FF0C4EA14658997CD3E25E2159B6B3@CAHIER.gst.uqam.ca>
2009-12-23 17:08 ` RE : categories: additions Joyal, André
2009-12-21 19:20 ` additions Michael Barr
2009-12-27 23:14 ` quantum information and foundation Dusko Pavlovic
[not found] ` <Pine.GSO.4.64.0912272037140.28761@merc3.comlab>
2009-12-28 16:38 ` Bob Coecke
[not found] ` <Pine.GSO.4.64.0912281630040.29390@merc4.comlab>
2009-12-28 18:17 ` Bob Coecke
2009-12-18 10:48 ` A well kept secret? KCHM
2009-12-19 20:55 ` Vaughan Pratt
2009-12-22 12:21 ` additions Mark Weber
2009-12-23 0:05 ` additions Scott Morrison
2009-12-23 14:13 ` additions Mark Weber
[not found] ` <B3C24EA955FF0C4EA14658997CD3E25E2159B6B8@CAHIER.gst.uqam.ca>
2009-12-23 21:04 ` CatLab Urs Schreiber
[not found] ` <4B3368C1.3000800@bath.ac.uk>
2009-12-24 16:25 ` additions Mike Stay
2009-12-26 0:03 ` additions Toby Bartels
[not found] ` <7f854b310912240825s39f195b2x2db16cc8f3a5cde7@mail.gmail.com>
2009-12-25 8:18 ` additions Carsten Führmann
[not found] ` <4B347567.9070603@bath.ac.uk>
2009-12-29 23:17 ` additions Mike Stay
2009-12-30 21:00 ` additions Greg Meredith
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-12-20 1:00 A well kept secret? Larry Harper
2009-12-20 14:38 ` Colin McLarty
2009-12-20 17:47 ` jim stasheff
2009-12-09 7:40 Ronnie Brown
2009-12-14 18:41 ` Andrew Stacey
2009-12-15 5:12 ` John Baez
2009-12-17 5:08 ` Ross Street
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.LRH.2.00.0912230135490.31758@taylor.maths.gla.ac.uk \
--to=tl@maths.gla.ac.uk \
--cc=categories@mta.ca \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).