From: Charles Wells <charles@abstractmath.org>
To: peasthope@shaw.ca, catbb <categories@mta.ca>
Subject: Re: Explanations
Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2011 14:58:14 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <E1QGrp9-00044X-Qt@mlist.mta.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E1QGFn2-0006ah-FD@mlist.mta.ca>
In the expression "any x:T->X" the T depends on x. If you use the
arrow notation you seem bound to name the domain of the morphism. You
could say "for any x with codomain X there is an e:dom x -> X ..." but
in the rest of the sentence you will have to mention the domain again.
My impression is that notation "any x:T->X" where T depends on x
without that fact being mentioned is common in category theory
writing. There is nothing wrong with this if a reader understands the
intent.
I would call it "suppression of dependence". In the Handbook I talked
about suppression of parameters, but this is not suppression of
parameters. It is something I had not noticed before. Are there
other situations in math where this happens?
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 2:56 PM, <peasthope@shaw.ca> wrote:
>
> Charles & everyone,
>
> Earlier peasthope wrote,
> "...changing a few words of a sentence can make a concept obvious rather
> than nebulous". Revise that to "obvious rather than difficult".
>
> From: Charles Wells <charles@abstractmath.org>
> Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2011 09:37:44 -0500
>> Can you give specific examples? I suspect that in most cases the change
>> introduces a useful metaphor that was hidden before.
>
> Here is a small example from the _Conceptual Mathematics_ of
> Lawvere and Schanuel. No offense to the authors or the book.
> It's an indispensible and invaluable resource.
>
> L&S page 292, "Definition ... equalizer ... and for each x:T-->X ... there is
> exactly one e:T-->E ... ." "For all T" is implicit.
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equalizer_(Mathematics) , "In category theory
> ... defined by a universal property, ... object E and morphism eq ... such that,
> given any other object O and morphism m ... ."
>
> For me, the reference to "any other object O" helps. The definition in the
> Wikipedia seems to reveal the "universality" of the equalizer better. The
> diagram also helps.
>
> A trivial issue for most readers but a small detail can make a difference for
> a student.
>
> Regards, ... Peter E.
>
> --
> Telephone 1 360 450 2132. bcc: peasthope at shaw.ca
> Shop pages http://carnot.yi.org/ accessible as long as the old drives survive.
> Personal pages http://members.shaw.ca/peasthope/ .
>
[For admin and other information see: http://www.mta.ca/~cat-dist/ ]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-30 19:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <BANLkTi=XhOM=FKajXUA6pyOq575fm_N=PQ@mail.gmail.com>
2011-04-29 19:56 ` Explanations peasthope
2011-04-30 19:58 ` Charles Wells [this message]
2011-05-02 17:01 ` Explanations Clemson Steve
2011-05-01 12:50 ` Explanations F. William Lawvere
[not found] <654PeBPnq2496S01.1304350816@web01.cms.usa.net>
2011-05-02 18:22 ` Explanations peasthope
2011-05-01 21:27 Explanations peasthope
[not found] <609PDdViw1024S04.1304197762@web04.cms.usa.net>
2011-05-01 21:00 ` Explanations peasthope
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-04-30 21:09 Explanations Fred E.J. Linton
2011-04-28 13:12 Explanations Ellis D. Cooper
2011-04-27 8:16 Explanations Mattias Wikström
2011-04-22 13:55 Explanations Graham White
2011-04-23 20:27 ` Explanations David Yetter
2011-04-23 21:29 ` Explanations Ronnie Brown
2011-04-25 13:51 ` Explanations Joyal, André
2011-04-26 0:52 ` Explanations jim stasheff
2011-04-26 13:45 ` Explanations William Messing
[not found] ` <4DB6CC7D.40407@math.umn.edu>
2011-04-26 22:05 ` Explanations Ronnie Brown
2011-04-23 21:52 ` Explanations Dusko Pavlovic
2011-04-25 13:17 ` Explanations ClemsonSteve
2011-04-26 5:55 ` Explanations Timothy Porter
2011-04-27 7:53 ` Explanations Uli Fahrenberg
[not found] ` <17617_1303861705_4DB759C9_17617_39_1_E1QEryD-0006dq-7k@mlist.mta.ca>
2011-04-27 13:20 ` Explanations Marta Bunge
2011-04-20 17:22 Explanations Fred E.J. Linton
2011-04-21 19:09 ` Explanations peasthope
2011-04-19 23:37 Explanations Jean-Pierre Marquis
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=E1QGrp9-00044X-Qt@mlist.mta.ca \
--to=charles@abstractmath.org \
--cc=categories@mta.ca \
--cc=peasthope@shaw.ca \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).