From: "André Joyal" <joyal.andre@uqam.ca>
To: categories <categories@mta.ca>
Subject: RE: size_question_encore
Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2011 09:30:07 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <E1Qfw7A-0008Cc-WC@mlist.mta.ca> (raw)
dear Marta,
I apologise, I had forgoten our conversation!
My memory was never good, and it is getting worst.
You wrote:
>No, I am not thinking of the analogue of Steve Lack's model
structure since, strictly speaking,
>it has nothing to do with stacks. Comments to that effect (with
which Steve agrees) are included
>in the Bunge-Hermida paper. It was actually a surprise to discover
that after trying to do what
>you suggest and failing.
I disagree with your conclusion. I looked at your paper with Hermida.
We are not talking about the same model structure. The fibrations in
2Cat(S) defined
by Steve Lack (your definition 7.1) are too weak when the topos S does
not satify the axiom of choice.
Equivalently, his generating set of trivial cofibrations is too small.
Nobody has read my paper with Myles
<A.Joyal, M.Tierney: Classifying spaces for sheaves of simplicial
groupoids, JPAA, Vol 89, 1993>.
Best,
André
-------- Message d'origine--------
De: Marta Bunge [mailto:martabunge@hotmail.com]
Date: sam. 09/07/2011 13:41
À: Joyal, André; edubuc@dm.uba.ar; categories@mta.ca
Objet : RE: RE : RE : categories: size_question_encore
Dear Andre,
You were indeed aware of my work and that with Pare on stacks since
you are one of the few we thank for useful conversations! There were
two ways to define stacks and one of them was your suggestion. One
could say that one is expressed directly in terms of descent and the
other in terms of weak equivalences. As it turns out, both are needed
in my construction of the stack completion and similarly in the 2-
dimensional case.
As for which method is preferable, I do not know. Whether one
constructs stack completions for categories in a Grothendieck topos
using the carving out from presheaf toposes (my method), or by means
of a model structure (yours), one has to resort to the existence of a
generating family to keep them small.
No, I am not thinking of the analogue of Steve Lack's model structure
since, strictly speaking, it has nothing to do with stacks. Comments
to that effect (with which Steve agrees) are included in the Bunge-
Hermida paper. It was actually a surprise to discover that after
trying to do what you suggest and failing. I attach my paper with
Hermida in this connection. Section 3 makes clear what happens with
Lack's model structure in dimension 1, and Section 7 considers the 2-
dimensional analogue, also not suitable to get the 2-stack completion.
I really meant an extension of the Joyal-Tierney model structure.
Thanks for pointing out Moerdijk's work, and your old one with
Tierney. I will eventually look into those.
No need to respond to this.
Best regards, and many thanks,Marta
> Subject: RE : RE : categories: size_question_encore
> Date: Sat, 9 Jul 2011 12:18:45 -0400
> From: joyal.andre@uqam.ca
> To: martabunge@hotmail.com; edubuc@dm.uba.ar; categories@mta.ca
>
> Dear Marta,
>
> I thank you for your message and for drawing my attention to your
work.
> I apologise for not having refered to it.
>
> >More recently (Bunge-Hermida, MakkaiFest, 2011), we have carried
out the 2-analogue of the 1-dimensional
> >case along the same lines of the 1979 papers, by constructing the
2-stack completion of a 2-gerbe in "exactly the same way". >Concerning
this, I have a question for you. Is there a model structure on 2-
Cat(S) (or 2-Gerbes(S)), for S a Grothedieck topos, >whose weak
equivalences are the weak 2-equivalence 2-functors, and whose fibrant
objects are precisely the (strong) 2-stacks? >Although not needed for
our work, the question came up naturally after your paper with Myles
Tierney. We could find no such >construction in the literature.
>
> I guess you are thinking of having the analog of Steve Lack's model
structure
> but for the category of 2-categories internal to a Grothendieck
topos S.
> That is a good question. I am not aware that this has been done
(but my knowledge of the litterature is lacunary).
> You may also want to establish the analog of Moerdijk's model
structure for the category of internal 2-groupoids.
> I am confident that these model structure exists.
> They should be closely related to a model structure on internal
simplicial groupoids
> <A.Joyal, M.Tierney: Classifying spaces for sheaves of simplicial
groupoids, JPAA, Vol 89, 1993>.
> And also related to the model structure on simplicial sheaves,
described in my letter
> to Grothendieck in 1984, but unfortunately not formally published.
>
> Best regards,
> Andre
>
[For admin and other information see: http://www.mta.ca/~cat-dist/ ]
next reply other threads:[~2011-07-10 13:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-07-10 13:30 André Joyal [this message]
2011-07-11 5:36 ` stacks (was: size_question_encore) David Roberts
[not found] ` <1310362598.4e1a8be6a7800@webmail.adelaide.edu.au>
2011-07-11 12:32 ` Marta Bunge
2011-07-12 1:20 ` Michael Shulman
[not found] <4683_1310312511_4E19C83F_4683_87_1_E1Qfw7A-0008Cc-WC@mlist.mta.ca>
2011-07-10 17:43 ` size_question_encore Marta Bunge
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-07-10 13:21 size_question_encore André Joyal
2011-07-05 23:29 size_question_encore Eduardo Dubuc
2011-07-11 2:47 ` size_question_encore Michael Shulman
2011-07-14 4:10 ` size_question_encore Toby Bartels
2011-07-15 6:03 ` size_question_encore Michael Shulman
[not found] ` <CAOvivQyMSgtRMDwvwmV4+UaUfitN-GRaajkh5WxpCipy+U_c+Q@mail.gmail.com>
2011-07-15 16:51 ` size_question_encore Toby Bartels
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=E1Qfw7A-0008Cc-WC@mlist.mta.ca \
--to=joyal.andre@uqam.ca \
--cc=categories@mta.ca \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).