Re: Overbearing undownloaded face

[Simon Josefsson <jas@extundo.com>]

Harry Putnam <hgp@sbcglobal.net> writes:

> I've recently come back to using the agent after several mnths of
> running plugged only.  The current setup with undownloaded face seems
> to overpower other long standing faces and options.

Yup.  I've been using this, perhaps the defaults should be changed?
Currently undownloadable marks is more important than, say, tick
marks, which doesn't seem right to me.  And I was used to the black
marks on unread messages.

I sent a message asking for opinions about this a few months ago, but
now that I try to find my message, I note that it contained a screen
shot so it was probably rejected due to size.  So:  Opinions?

--- gnus-sum.el.~6.342.~	Tue Apr 29 02:44:20 2003
+++ gnus-sum.el	Fri May  2 14:16:54 2003
@@ -902,12 +902,6 @@
 (defcustom gnus-summary-highlight
   '(((eq mark gnus-canceled-mark)
      . gnus-summary-cancelled-face)
-    ((and uncached (> score default-high))
-     . gnus-summary-high-undownloaded-face)
-    ((and uncached (< score default-low))
-     . gnus-summary-low-undownloaded-face)
-    (uncached
-     . gnus-summary-normal-undownloaded-face)
     ((and (> score default-high)
 	  (or (eq mark gnus-dormant-mark)
 	      (eq mark gnus-ticked-mark)))
@@ -935,6 +929,12 @@
      . gnus-summary-high-read-face)
     ((< score default-low)
      . gnus-summary-low-read-face)
+    ((and uncached (> score default-high))
+     . gnus-summary-high-undownloaded-face)
+    ((and uncached (< score default-low))
+     . gnus-summary-low-undownloaded-face)
+    (uncached
+     . gnus-summary-normal-undownloaded-face)
     (t
      . gnus-summary-normal-read-face))
   "*Controls the highlighting of summary buffer lines.