From: Per Abrahamsen <abraham@dina.kvl.dk>
Subject: Re: ognus
Date: 30 Oct 2000 12:35:37 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <rjr94ymuie.fsf@ssv2.dina.kvl.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200010291739.RAA06135@djlvig.dl.ac.uk>
Dave Love <d.love@dl.ac.uk> writes:
> This is unfortunate. Now people (like me) used to doing updates
> against the CVS head or, I guess, picking up snapshots, get something
> unstable that they're not expecting and they can't pick up bug fixes
> to Gnus 5.8. It also screws me merging stuff for Emacs 21.
All other CVS based projects I know of either have HEAD as the front
of the development branch, or are planning to do so in the future
because having HEAD be the stable branch causes too many problems.
There are no excuse for picking up software with CVS and expecting
stable code.
> Gnus 5.8 should have been stabilized and a proper release made before
> this.
Aren't all the 5.8.7 point releases stable?
> It should not have XEmacs-specific files on it, or anything for which
> we don't have assignments.
I thought Lars always required assignments for Gnus code.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2000-10-30 11:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 69+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-10-27 22:59 ognus Simon Josefsson
2000-10-28 0:25 ` ognus ShengHuo ZHU
2000-10-28 13:41 ` ognus Simon Josefsson
2000-10-28 15:34 ` ognus Kai Großjohann
2000-10-28 15:41 ` ognus Simon Josefsson
2000-10-29 17:47 ` ognus Dave Love
2000-10-31 22:09 ` S/MIME and PGP/MIME (Was: Re: ognus) Bjørn Mork
2000-10-31 23:18 ` ShengHuo ZHU
2000-11-01 20:41 ` Bjørn Mork
2000-10-28 19:22 ` emacs21-branch (Re: ognus) Karl Eichwalder
2000-10-29 17:47 ` Dave Love
2000-10-29 18:48 ` Karl Eichwalder
2000-10-29 19:50 ` Kai Großjohann
2000-10-29 21:26 ` Florian Weimer
2000-10-29 22:53 ` ShengHuo ZHU
2000-10-30 22:53 ` Dave Love
2000-10-30 23:20 ` Denys Duchier
2000-10-30 23:38 ` Laura Conrad
2000-10-31 9:50 ` Denys Duchier
2000-11-02 17:25 ` Dave Love
2000-11-02 17:34 ` Gunnar Evermann
2000-11-03 19:09 ` Dave Love
2000-11-03 22:07 ` Gunnar Evermann
2000-11-02 21:01 ` Denys Duchier
2000-11-02 22:53 ` Kai Großjohann
2000-11-03 14:31 ` Per Abrahamsen
2000-11-03 14:42 ` luis fernandes
2000-11-04 11:42 ` Steinar Bang
2000-11-04 2:52 ` Russ Allbery
2000-11-03 19:14 ` Dave Love
2000-11-03 19:42 ` Denys Duchier
2000-11-04 0:04 ` Kai Großjohann
2000-11-04 15:04 ` Per Abrahamsen
2000-11-04 20:15 ` Denys Duchier
2000-11-04 22:59 ` Andreas Fuchs
2000-11-05 1:15 ` Russ Allbery
2000-11-02 17:23 ` Dave Love
2000-10-31 0:17 ` Steven E. Harris
2000-10-31 10:09 ` Kai Großjohann
2000-10-29 17:39 ` ognus Dave Love
2000-10-30 11:35 ` Per Abrahamsen [this message]
2000-10-30 13:05 ` ognus Kai Großjohann
2000-10-30 23:24 ` ognus Dave Love
2000-10-31 10:16 ` ognus Kai Großjohann
2000-11-04 20:23 ` ognus Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2000-11-04 22:04 ` ognus Kai Großjohann
2000-11-04 22:34 ` ognus Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2000-10-30 23:22 ` ognus Dave Love
2000-10-31 9:07 ` ognus Russ Allbery
2000-10-31 13:06 ` ognus Karl Kleinpaste
2000-10-31 17:00 ` ognus Sean Doran
2000-10-31 17:55 ` ognus Kai Großjohann
2000-10-31 13:36 ` ognus Per Abrahamsen
2000-10-31 16:49 ` ognus Sean Doran
2000-11-02 17:35 ` ognus Dave Love
2000-11-02 18:08 ` ognus ShengHuo ZHU
2000-11-02 19:31 ` uunassigned code (was: Re: ognus) Per Abrahamsen
2000-11-03 19:01 ` ognus Dave Love
2000-11-02 19:18 ` ognus Per Abrahamsen
2000-11-02 23:01 ` ognus Kai Großjohann
2000-11-03 14:11 ` ognus Per Abrahamsen
2000-11-03 19:04 ` ognus Dave Love
2000-11-04 15:11 ` ognus Per Abrahamsen
2000-11-03 15:39 ` ognus Simon Josefsson
2000-11-04 20:31 ` ognus Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2000-10-31 16:37 ` ognus Sean Doran
2000-11-02 17:22 ` ognus Dave Love
2000-11-04 11:48 ` ognus Steinar Bang
2000-11-04 11:45 ` ognus Steinar Bang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=rjr94ymuie.fsf@ssv2.dina.kvl.dk \
--to=abraham@dina.kvl.dk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).