From: Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE (Kai Großjohann)
Cc: ding@gnus.org
Subject: Re: emacs21-branch (Re: ognus)
Date: 02 Nov 2000 23:53:09 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <vafsnpahtpm.fsf@lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <is66m6nl69.fsf@elk.ps.uni-sb.de>
On 02 Nov 2000, Denys Duchier wrote:
> I think your reply is very symptomatic of what I find frustrating
> about GNU projects: namely that one must petition the high priests
> in order to obtain the slightest tidbits of information :-) Case in
> point: Emacs. Why does the general public have no information and
> no access to the current developments? Why should I have to be an
> `accredited' contributor in order to have access to this
> information?
(Off-topic alert.)
I'm also interested in this. Obviously, the Emacs development model
has worked quite well for a long time. But I don't know why is it the
way it is. That would be interesting to know.
(Back on topic.)
I also think that the CVS server organization should be documented. I
don't care whether it's in gnus.texi or gnus-devel.texi or in the
INSTALL or README file.
kai
--
The arms should be held in a natural and unaffected way and never
be conspicuous. -- Revised Technique of Latin American Dancing
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2000-11-02 22:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 69+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-10-27 22:59 ognus Simon Josefsson
2000-10-28 0:25 ` ognus ShengHuo ZHU
2000-10-28 13:41 ` ognus Simon Josefsson
2000-10-28 15:34 ` ognus Kai Großjohann
2000-10-28 15:41 ` ognus Simon Josefsson
2000-10-29 17:47 ` ognus Dave Love
2000-10-31 22:09 ` S/MIME and PGP/MIME (Was: Re: ognus) Bjørn Mork
2000-10-31 23:18 ` ShengHuo ZHU
2000-11-01 20:41 ` Bjørn Mork
2000-10-28 19:22 ` emacs21-branch (Re: ognus) Karl Eichwalder
2000-10-29 17:47 ` Dave Love
2000-10-29 18:48 ` Karl Eichwalder
2000-10-29 19:50 ` Kai Großjohann
2000-10-29 21:26 ` Florian Weimer
2000-10-29 22:53 ` ShengHuo ZHU
2000-10-30 22:53 ` Dave Love
2000-10-30 23:20 ` Denys Duchier
2000-10-30 23:38 ` Laura Conrad
2000-10-31 9:50 ` Denys Duchier
2000-11-02 17:25 ` Dave Love
2000-11-02 17:34 ` Gunnar Evermann
2000-11-03 19:09 ` Dave Love
2000-11-03 22:07 ` Gunnar Evermann
2000-11-02 21:01 ` Denys Duchier
2000-11-02 22:53 ` Kai Großjohann [this message]
2000-11-03 14:31 ` Per Abrahamsen
2000-11-03 14:42 ` luis fernandes
2000-11-04 11:42 ` Steinar Bang
2000-11-04 2:52 ` Russ Allbery
2000-11-03 19:14 ` Dave Love
2000-11-03 19:42 ` Denys Duchier
2000-11-04 0:04 ` Kai Großjohann
2000-11-04 15:04 ` Per Abrahamsen
2000-11-04 20:15 ` Denys Duchier
2000-11-04 22:59 ` Andreas Fuchs
2000-11-05 1:15 ` Russ Allbery
2000-11-02 17:23 ` Dave Love
2000-10-31 0:17 ` Steven E. Harris
2000-10-31 10:09 ` Kai Großjohann
2000-10-29 17:39 ` ognus Dave Love
2000-10-30 11:35 ` ognus Per Abrahamsen
2000-10-30 13:05 ` ognus Kai Großjohann
2000-10-30 23:24 ` ognus Dave Love
2000-10-31 10:16 ` ognus Kai Großjohann
2000-11-04 20:23 ` ognus Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2000-11-04 22:04 ` ognus Kai Großjohann
2000-11-04 22:34 ` ognus Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2000-10-30 23:22 ` ognus Dave Love
2000-10-31 9:07 ` ognus Russ Allbery
2000-10-31 13:06 ` ognus Karl Kleinpaste
2000-10-31 17:00 ` ognus Sean Doran
2000-10-31 17:55 ` ognus Kai Großjohann
2000-10-31 13:36 ` ognus Per Abrahamsen
2000-10-31 16:49 ` ognus Sean Doran
2000-11-02 17:35 ` ognus Dave Love
2000-11-02 18:08 ` ognus ShengHuo ZHU
2000-11-02 19:31 ` uunassigned code (was: Re: ognus) Per Abrahamsen
2000-11-03 19:01 ` ognus Dave Love
2000-11-02 19:18 ` ognus Per Abrahamsen
2000-11-02 23:01 ` ognus Kai Großjohann
2000-11-03 14:11 ` ognus Per Abrahamsen
2000-11-03 19:04 ` ognus Dave Love
2000-11-04 15:11 ` ognus Per Abrahamsen
2000-11-03 15:39 ` ognus Simon Josefsson
2000-11-04 20:31 ` ognus Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2000-10-31 16:37 ` ognus Sean Doran
2000-11-02 17:22 ` ognus Dave Love
2000-11-04 11:48 ` ognus Steinar Bang
2000-11-04 11:45 ` ognus Steinar Bang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=vafsnpahtpm.fsf@lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de \
--to=kai.grossjohann@cs.uni-dortmund.de \
--cc=ding@gnus.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).