From: Russ Allbery <rra@stanford.edu>
Subject: Re: ognus
Date: 31 Oct 2000 01:07:16 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ylem0xtm4b.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Dave Love's message of "Mon, 30 Oct 2000 23:22:11 GMT"
Dave Love <d.love@dl.ac.uk> writes:
> Certainly things after 5.8.7 don't look too stable and 5.8.7 was
> apparently released with mail-source-delete-incoming turned off, for
> instance, even if there's notthing else seriously wrong with it.
5.8.7 has multiple outstanding bugs, some of which are just annoying
(random failures to decode format=flowed that go away when I peer at them
funny, the random inclusion of NNTP responses in the article headers, some
weird slowness when only a few newsgroups have additional articles when
you press 'g') and some of which seem more serious (complete inability to
encode some corrupted types of messages with non-ASCII characters that I
run into when forwarding spam ranging from a whole sequence of odd
"message has unknown characters" questions to aborting errors about
functions being called with the wrong numbers of arguments).
I've reported some of these to this list. I tried using the bug-reporting
command and discovered that it included in the e-mail message tons of
information that I consider private, such as my entire split ruleset, so
that was a bit of a non-starter. Some of the rest I can't reproduce well
enough to generate a bug report for, although I'll give it another try
when I run into a good test case.
> You might think or hope that. You might hope that everybody with CVS
> write access would have an assignment on file and that no-one else
> checked in anything dubious. If you were Gerd or me, you'd be
> disappointed and waste a lot of time on the issue.
> rms was right to worry about the situation more than I did previously.
It's staggeringly difficult to run a successful free software project with
many contributors and the GNU copyright submission rules. I'm very
impressed by those people who manage it; I know from trying to manage INN
development that it would be a complete non-starter for us. This isn't a
complaint; I know why they exist. But it's really bloody hard.
--
Russ Allbery (rra@stanford.edu) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2000-10-31 9:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 69+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-10-27 22:59 ognus Simon Josefsson
2000-10-28 0:25 ` ognus ShengHuo ZHU
2000-10-28 13:41 ` ognus Simon Josefsson
2000-10-28 15:34 ` ognus Kai Großjohann
2000-10-28 15:41 ` ognus Simon Josefsson
2000-10-29 17:47 ` ognus Dave Love
2000-10-31 22:09 ` S/MIME and PGP/MIME (Was: Re: ognus) Bjørn Mork
2000-10-31 23:18 ` ShengHuo ZHU
2000-11-01 20:41 ` Bjørn Mork
2000-10-28 19:22 ` emacs21-branch (Re: ognus) Karl Eichwalder
2000-10-29 17:47 ` Dave Love
2000-10-29 18:48 ` Karl Eichwalder
2000-10-29 19:50 ` Kai Großjohann
2000-10-29 21:26 ` Florian Weimer
2000-10-29 22:53 ` ShengHuo ZHU
2000-10-30 22:53 ` Dave Love
2000-10-30 23:20 ` Denys Duchier
2000-10-30 23:38 ` Laura Conrad
2000-10-31 9:50 ` Denys Duchier
2000-11-02 17:25 ` Dave Love
2000-11-02 17:34 ` Gunnar Evermann
2000-11-03 19:09 ` Dave Love
2000-11-03 22:07 ` Gunnar Evermann
2000-11-02 21:01 ` Denys Duchier
2000-11-02 22:53 ` Kai Großjohann
2000-11-03 14:31 ` Per Abrahamsen
2000-11-03 14:42 ` luis fernandes
2000-11-04 11:42 ` Steinar Bang
2000-11-04 2:52 ` Russ Allbery
2000-11-03 19:14 ` Dave Love
2000-11-03 19:42 ` Denys Duchier
2000-11-04 0:04 ` Kai Großjohann
2000-11-04 15:04 ` Per Abrahamsen
2000-11-04 20:15 ` Denys Duchier
2000-11-04 22:59 ` Andreas Fuchs
2000-11-05 1:15 ` Russ Allbery
2000-11-02 17:23 ` Dave Love
2000-10-31 0:17 ` Steven E. Harris
2000-10-31 10:09 ` Kai Großjohann
2000-10-29 17:39 ` ognus Dave Love
2000-10-30 11:35 ` ognus Per Abrahamsen
2000-10-30 13:05 ` ognus Kai Großjohann
2000-10-30 23:24 ` ognus Dave Love
2000-10-31 10:16 ` ognus Kai Großjohann
2000-11-04 20:23 ` ognus Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2000-11-04 22:04 ` ognus Kai Großjohann
2000-11-04 22:34 ` ognus Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2000-10-30 23:22 ` ognus Dave Love
2000-10-31 9:07 ` Russ Allbery [this message]
2000-10-31 13:06 ` ognus Karl Kleinpaste
2000-10-31 17:00 ` ognus Sean Doran
2000-10-31 17:55 ` ognus Kai Großjohann
2000-10-31 13:36 ` ognus Per Abrahamsen
2000-10-31 16:49 ` ognus Sean Doran
2000-11-02 17:35 ` ognus Dave Love
2000-11-02 18:08 ` ognus ShengHuo ZHU
2000-11-02 19:31 ` uunassigned code (was: Re: ognus) Per Abrahamsen
2000-11-03 19:01 ` ognus Dave Love
2000-11-02 19:18 ` ognus Per Abrahamsen
2000-11-02 23:01 ` ognus Kai Großjohann
2000-11-03 14:11 ` ognus Per Abrahamsen
2000-11-03 19:04 ` ognus Dave Love
2000-11-04 15:11 ` ognus Per Abrahamsen
2000-11-03 15:39 ` ognus Simon Josefsson
2000-11-04 20:31 ` ognus Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2000-10-31 16:37 ` ognus Sean Doran
2000-11-02 17:22 ` ognus Dave Love
2000-11-04 11:48 ` ognus Steinar Bang
2000-11-04 11:45 ` ognus Steinar Bang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ylem0xtm4b.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu \
--to=rra@stanford.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).