Re: compatibility request -- `q' in *Article* buffer shouldn't quit group

[<jari.aalto@poboxes.com> (Jari Aalto+list.ding)]

| 1998-10-11 Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic@srce.hr> list.ding
| SL Baur <steve@xemacs.org> writes:
| > 
| > That's exactly the point.  TM has been around for a *long* time --
| > as long as Gnus 5 has been in existence.  
| 
| The phrase "backward compatibility" cannot apply here because TM has
| never been a part of Gnus.  People who used TM did so "on their own
| responsibility".  Incompatibly changing Gnus to satisfy former TM
| users would IMHO be plain wrong.

C'mon. You're splitting hairs here. TM has been practically the de facto
standard for MIME since day 1 when it come in picture. Just like Gnus is
the de facto standard for News reading.

TM has supported every major MUA platform and it should be treated as respectfully
as GNUS in spite of the decisions of not integrating TM into Gnus. There are lot
of people that use TM with gnus and continue to do so as long as it works.

I also agree with steve, that SPC/BACKSPACE should go to next/prev mime section.

jari