From: Kevin Carhart <kevin@carhart.net>
To: Edbrowse-dev@lists.the-brannons.com
Subject: Re: [Edbrowse-dev] data-* attributes
Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2017 17:23:03 -0800 (PST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.03.1711221705330.30731@carhart.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LRH.2.03.1711221321240.24805@carhart.net>
>> This is a real world website, so I guess I should interpret undefined as
>> true, and move forward with the link.
I think this is probably true, but it might or might not be relevant to
look at whether this actually is a real world website. I mean, at one
level it is, but this is a keywords and SEO-related website, like a link
farm for gaming Google's page rank. You can tell because the relationship
of the content to the word "orange" is not all there somehow.
Does this matter when all you are
assessing is the prevalence of their technical phrasing?? Maybe not, but
the perversity or orneryness in terms of the site authors' goals might
reflect on whether it's a good proxy for the world.. of course if the
world is also perverse and ornery then you're fine.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-11-23 1:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-11-16 12:29 [Edbrowse-dev] Tidy error reporting Karl Dahlke
2017-11-22 8:43 ` [Edbrowse-dev] data-* attributes Kevin Carhart
2017-11-22 9:33 ` Kevin Carhart
2017-11-22 15:48 ` Karl Dahlke
2017-11-22 21:36 ` Kevin Carhart
2017-11-23 1:23 ` Kevin Carhart [this message]
2017-11-24 21:19 ` Karl Dahlke
2017-11-25 0:20 ` [Edbrowse-dev] data-* attributes / new work on RC Kevin Carhart
2017-11-25 0:56 ` Karl Dahlke
2017-11-25 1:15 ` Kevin Carhart
2017-11-25 1:22 ` Karl Dahlke
2017-11-25 1:44 ` Kevin Carhart
2017-11-25 2:28 ` Karl Dahlke
2017-11-25 3:10 ` Kevin Carhart
2017-11-25 5:02 ` Karl Dahlke
2017-11-25 5:35 ` Kevin Carhart
2017-11-26 13:14 ` Karl Dahlke
2017-11-27 1:03 ` Kevin Carhart
2017-11-27 1:48 ` Kevin Carhart
2017-11-27 2:58 ` Karl Dahlke
2017-11-27 3:37 ` Kevin Carhart
2017-11-26 22:43 ` Karl Dahlke
2017-11-27 3:19 ` Kevin Carhart
2017-11-27 4:23 ` Karl Dahlke
2017-11-27 4:51 ` Kevin Carhart
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.LRH.2.03.1711221705330.30731@carhart.net \
--to=kevin@carhart.net \
--cc=Edbrowse-dev@lists.the-brannons.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).