Discussion of Homotopy Type Theory and Univalent Foundations
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vladimir Voevodsky <vlad...@ias.edu>
To: Benedikt Ahrens <benedik...@gmail.com>
Cc: "Prof. Vladimir Voevodsky" <vlad...@ias.edu>,
	Univalent Mathematics <univalent-...@googlegroups.com>,
	Paolo Capriotti <pa...@capriotti.io>,
	homotopytypetheory <homotopyt...@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [HoTT] about the HTS
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2017 16:45:55 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4796BE9D-E759-4F57-A3AB-8F8808C01D76@ias.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <29b2bdf5-3838-a268-5a44-4aea998cb878@gmail.com>

BTW It is a little dangerous to define presheaves as functors C -> Sets^{op}. While it gives the correct objects, the morphisms between presheaves are not morphisms in the category of functors C -> Sets^{op} but in the opposite category.


> On Feb 23, 2017, at 1:52 PM, Benedikt Ahrens <benedik...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Section 1.4.8 "Equality" gives an informal account and points to several
> precise definitions.
> On page 43 two equality types are considered, one intensional one and
> one with reflection rule.
> 
> Maybe Paolo (in CC) can explain his setup himself.
> 
> On 02/23/2017 07:08 PM, Vladimir Voevodsky wrote:
>> I could not find where he defines the univalent (intensional)
>> equality. It seems that all his equalities are strict.
>> 
>> 
>>> On Feb 23, 2017, at 9:57 AM, Benedikt Ahrens
>>> <benedik...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On 02/23/2017 03:47 PM, Vladimir Voevodsky wrote:
>>>> Just a thought… Can we devise a version of the HTS where exact 
>>>> equality types are not available for the universes such that,
>>>> even with the exact equality, HTS would remain a univalent
>>>> theory.
>>>> 
>>>> Maybe only some types should be equipped with the exact equality
>>>> and this should be a special quality of types.
>>>> 
>>>> Vladimir.
>>>> 
>>>> PS If there are higher inductive types then the exact equality
>>>> should not be available for them either.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Paolo Capriotti, in his PhD thesis "Models of Type Theory with
>>> Strict Equality" [1], has studied strict equality in type theory.
>>> 
>>>> From page 69:
>>> 
>>> "Finally, universes in the strict fragment of our system are not
>>> assumed to be fibrant types, like in HTS."
>>> 
>>> You might be interested in Section 4.1.1, "Differences with HTS".
>>> 
>>> [1] https://arxiv.org/abs/1702.04912
>>> 
>>> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the
>>> Google Groups "Homotopy Type Theory" group. To unsubscribe from
>>> this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to
>>> HomotopyTypeThe...@googlegroups.com. For more options,
>>> visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>> 
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Homotopy Type Theory" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to HomotopyTypeThe...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


  reply	other threads:[~2017-02-23 21:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-02-23 14:47 Vladimir Voevodsky
2017-02-23 14:57 ` [HoTT] " Benedikt Ahrens
2017-02-23 18:08   ` Vladimir Voevodsky
2017-02-23 18:52     ` Benedikt Ahrens
2017-02-23 21:45       ` Vladimir Voevodsky [this message]
     [not found]         ` <87k28fek09.fsf@capriotti.io>
2017-02-24 14:36           ` [UniMath] " Vladimir Voevodsky
2017-02-24 15:06             ` Paolo Capriotti
2017-02-24 15:10               ` Vladimir Voevodsky
2017-03-10 13:35             ` HIT Thierry Coquand
2017-02-24 14:36         ` [HoTT] about the HTS Paolo Capriotti
2017-02-25 19:19 ` Thierry Coquand
2017-02-27 18:50   ` [UniMath] " Vladimir Voevodsky
2017-02-27 18:53     ` Vladimir Voevodsky
2017-02-27 18:58       ` Thierry Coquand
2017-02-28  2:17         ` Vladimir Voevodsky
2017-03-01 20:23           ` Thierry Coquand
2017-03-20 15:12 ` Matt Oliveri
2017-03-22 16:49   ` [HoTT] " Thierry Coquand
2017-03-22 21:01     ` Vladimir Voevodsky
2017-03-23 11:22       ` Matt Oliveri
2017-03-23 11:33         ` Michael Shulman
2017-03-23 12:16           ` Matt Oliveri

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4796BE9D-E759-4F57-A3AB-8F8808C01D76@ias.edu \
    --to="vlad..."@ias.edu \
    --cc="benedik..."@gmail.com \
    --cc="homotopyt..."@googlegroups.com \
    --cc="pa..."@capriotti.io \
    --cc="univalent-..."@googlegroups.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).