From: Matt Oliveri <atm...@gmail.com>
To: Homotopy Type Theory <HomotopyT...@googlegroups.com>
Cc: univalent-...@googlegroups.com, vlad...@ias.edu
Subject: Re: about the HTS
Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2017 08:12:40 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <96ed5e86-5564-4d98-a759-5a3301968501@googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1FFF5B8D-06FC-4ECD-8F89-496A4C2E3A3A@ias.edu>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 579 bytes --]
So the answer was yes, right? Problem solved?
On Thursday, February 23, 2017 at 9:47:57 AM UTC-5, v v wrote:
>
> Just a thought… Can we devise a version of the HTS where exact equality
> types are not available for the universes such that, even with the exact
> equality, HTS would remain a univalent theory.
>
> Maybe only some types should be equipped with the exact equality and this
> should be a special quality of types.
>
> Vladimir.
>
> PS If there are higher inductive types then the exact equality should not
> be available for them either.
>
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 721 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-20 15:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-02-23 14:47 Vladimir Voevodsky
2017-02-23 14:57 ` [HoTT] " Benedikt Ahrens
2017-02-23 18:08 ` Vladimir Voevodsky
2017-02-23 18:52 ` Benedikt Ahrens
2017-02-23 21:45 ` Vladimir Voevodsky
[not found] ` <87k28fek09.fsf@capriotti.io>
2017-02-24 14:36 ` [UniMath] " Vladimir Voevodsky
2017-02-24 15:06 ` Paolo Capriotti
2017-02-24 15:10 ` Vladimir Voevodsky
2017-03-10 13:35 ` HIT Thierry Coquand
2017-02-24 14:36 ` [HoTT] about the HTS Paolo Capriotti
2017-02-25 19:19 ` Thierry Coquand
2017-02-27 18:50 ` [UniMath] " Vladimir Voevodsky
2017-02-27 18:53 ` Vladimir Voevodsky
2017-02-27 18:58 ` Thierry Coquand
2017-02-28 2:17 ` Vladimir Voevodsky
2017-03-01 20:23 ` Thierry Coquand
2017-03-20 15:12 ` Matt Oliveri [this message]
2017-03-22 16:49 ` Thierry Coquand
2017-03-22 21:01 ` Vladimir Voevodsky
2017-03-23 11:22 ` Matt Oliveri
2017-03-23 11:33 ` Michael Shulman
2017-03-23 12:16 ` Matt Oliveri
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=96ed5e86-5564-4d98-a759-5a3301968501@googlegroups.com \
--to="atm..."@gmail.com \
--cc="HomotopyT..."@googlegroups.com \
--cc="univalent-..."@googlegroups.com \
--cc="vlad..."@ias.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).