From: Vladimir Voevodsky <vlad...@ias.edu>
To: Thierry Coquand <Thierry...@cse.gu.se>
Cc: "Prof. Vladimir Voevodsky" <vlad...@ias.edu>,
"univalent-...@googlegroups.com" <univalent-...@googlegroups.com>,
homotopytypetheory <homotopyt...@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [UniMath] [HoTT] about the HTS
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2017 21:17:25 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <814709BF-E17F-4E1B-9676-C01B1673D6B5@ias.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1806f2f9c6484a438935d6c2ed6d7fc2@cse.gu.se>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2620 bytes --]
We also validate axiom K with the hSet, as far as I understand.
BTW why do you call elements of bSet Bishop sets?
> On Feb 27, 2017, at 1:58 PM, Thierry Coquand <Thierry...@cse.gu.se> wrote:
>
>
> Exactly.
>
> In my note, I consider three universes (all fibrant)
>
> sProp
> sSet
> bSet
>
> sProp sub-presheaf of sSet sub-presheaf bSet sub-presheaf U
>
> They correspond to 3 properties
>
> G |- A sprop
> G |- A sset
> G |- A bset
>
> that can be described semantically in a simple way.
>
> For sprop and sset, to have a fibration structure is a property
> and
>
> G |- A sset and fibrant
>
> should correspond to the notion of covering space.
>
> But sSet does not correspond to a decidable type system, while
> it should be the case that sProp and bSet corresponds to a decidable
> type system.
>
> At least with bSet we validate axiom K and all developments that have
> been done using this axiom.
>
>
>
>
> From: Vladimir Voevodsky <vlad...@ias.edu <mailto:vlad...@ias.edu>>
> Sent: Monday, February 27, 2017 7:53 PM
> To: Thierry Coquand
> Cc: Prof. Vladimir Voevodsky; univalent-...@googlegroups.com <mailto:univalent-...@googlegroups.com>; homotopytypetheory
> Subject: Re: [UniMath] [HoTT] about the HTS
>
> BTW, even if the universe of strict sets is not fibrant we can still have a judgement that something is a strict set and the rule that a = b implies a is definitionally equal to b if a and b are elements of a strict set.
>
> It is such a structure that would make many things very convenient.
>
> It is non- clear to, however, why typing would be decidable in such a system.
>
> Vladimir.
>
>
>
>
>> On Feb 27, 2017, at 1:50 PM, Vladimir Voevodsky <vlad...@ias.edu <mailto:vlad...@ias.edu>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On Feb 25, 2017, at 2:19 PM, Thierry Coquand <Thierry...@cse.gu.se <mailto:Thierry...@cse.gu.se>> wrote:
>>>
>>> “Bishop set” which corresponds
>>> to the fact that any two paths between the same end points are -judgmentally- equal.
>>
>> This is not what I mean by a strict set. A strict set is a Bishop set where any two points connected by a path are judgmentally equal.
>>
>>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Homotopy Type Theory" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to HomotopyTypeThe...@googlegroups.com <mailto:HomotopyTypeThe...@googlegroups.com>.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout <https://groups.google.com/d/optout>.
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 12430 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-02-28 2:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-02-23 14:47 Vladimir Voevodsky
2017-02-23 14:57 ` [HoTT] " Benedikt Ahrens
2017-02-23 18:08 ` Vladimir Voevodsky
2017-02-23 18:52 ` Benedikt Ahrens
2017-02-23 21:45 ` Vladimir Voevodsky
[not found] ` <87k28fek09.fsf@capriotti.io>
2017-02-24 14:36 ` [UniMath] " Vladimir Voevodsky
2017-02-24 15:06 ` Paolo Capriotti
2017-02-24 15:10 ` Vladimir Voevodsky
2017-03-10 13:35 ` HIT Thierry Coquand
2017-02-24 14:36 ` [HoTT] about the HTS Paolo Capriotti
2017-02-25 19:19 ` Thierry Coquand
2017-02-27 18:50 ` [UniMath] " Vladimir Voevodsky
2017-02-27 18:53 ` Vladimir Voevodsky
2017-02-27 18:58 ` Thierry Coquand
2017-02-28 2:17 ` Vladimir Voevodsky [this message]
2017-03-01 20:23 ` Thierry Coquand
2017-03-20 15:12 ` Matt Oliveri
2017-03-22 16:49 ` [HoTT] " Thierry Coquand
2017-03-22 21:01 ` Vladimir Voevodsky
2017-03-23 11:22 ` Matt Oliveri
2017-03-23 11:33 ` Michael Shulman
2017-03-23 12:16 ` Matt Oliveri
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=814709BF-E17F-4E1B-9676-C01B1673D6B5@ias.edu \
--to="vlad..."@ias.edu \
--cc="Thierry..."@cse.gu.se \
--cc="homotopyt..."@googlegroups.com \
--cc="univalent-..."@googlegroups.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).