From: Benedikt Ahrens <benedik...@gmail.com>
To: Vladimir Voevodsky <vlad...@ias.edu>,
Univalent Mathematics <univalent-...@googlegroups.com>,
homotopytypetheory <homotopyt...@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [HoTT] about the HTS
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2017 15:57:30 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <484524d2-4054-5b7a-14af-e68a8e4b8375@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1FFF5B8D-06FC-4ECD-8F89-496A4C2E3A3A@ias.edu>
On 02/23/2017 03:47 PM, Vladimir Voevodsky wrote:
> Just a thought… Can we devise a version of the HTS where exact
> equality types are not available for the universes such that, even
> with the exact equality, HTS would remain a univalent theory.
>
> Maybe only some types should be equipped with the exact equality and
> this should be a special quality of types.
>
> Vladimir.
>
> PS If there are higher inductive types then the exact equality should
> not be available for them either.
Paolo Capriotti, in his PhD thesis "Models of Type Theory with Strict
Equality" [1], has studied strict equality in type theory.
From page 69:
"Finally, universes in the strict fragment of our system are not assumed
to be fibrant types, like in HTS."
You might be interested in Section 4.1.1, "Differences with HTS".
[1] https://arxiv.org/abs/1702.04912
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-02-23 14:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-02-23 14:47 Vladimir Voevodsky
2017-02-23 14:57 ` Benedikt Ahrens [this message]
2017-02-23 18:08 ` [HoTT] " Vladimir Voevodsky
2017-02-23 18:52 ` Benedikt Ahrens
2017-02-23 21:45 ` Vladimir Voevodsky
[not found] ` <87k28fek09.fsf@capriotti.io>
2017-02-24 14:36 ` [UniMath] " Vladimir Voevodsky
2017-02-24 15:06 ` Paolo Capriotti
2017-02-24 15:10 ` Vladimir Voevodsky
2017-03-10 13:35 ` HIT Thierry Coquand
2017-02-24 14:36 ` [HoTT] about the HTS Paolo Capriotti
2017-02-25 19:19 ` Thierry Coquand
2017-02-27 18:50 ` [UniMath] " Vladimir Voevodsky
2017-02-27 18:53 ` Vladimir Voevodsky
2017-02-27 18:58 ` Thierry Coquand
2017-02-28 2:17 ` Vladimir Voevodsky
2017-03-01 20:23 ` Thierry Coquand
2017-03-20 15:12 ` Matt Oliveri
2017-03-22 16:49 ` [HoTT] " Thierry Coquand
2017-03-22 21:01 ` Vladimir Voevodsky
2017-03-23 11:22 ` Matt Oliveri
2017-03-23 11:33 ` Michael Shulman
2017-03-23 12:16 ` Matt Oliveri
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=484524d2-4054-5b7a-14af-e68a8e4b8375@gmail.com \
--to="benedik..."@gmail.com \
--cc="homotopyt..."@googlegroups.com \
--cc="univalent-..."@googlegroups.com \
--cc="vlad..."@ias.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).