Discussion of Homotopy Type Theory and Univalent Foundations
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Benedikt Ahrens <benedik...@gmail.com>
To: Vladimir Voevodsky <vlad...@ias.edu>,
	Univalent Mathematics <univalent-...@googlegroups.com>,
	homotopytypetheory <homotopyt...@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [HoTT] about the HTS
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2017 15:57:30 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <484524d2-4054-5b7a-14af-e68a8e4b8375@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1FFF5B8D-06FC-4ECD-8F89-496A4C2E3A3A@ias.edu>



On 02/23/2017 03:47 PM, Vladimir Voevodsky wrote:
> Just a thought… Can we devise a version of the HTS where exact
> equality types are not available for the universes such that, even
> with the exact equality, HTS would remain a univalent theory.
> 
> Maybe only some types should be equipped with the exact equality and
> this should be a special quality of types.
> 
> Vladimir.
> 
> PS If there are higher inductive types then the exact equality should
> not be available for them either.


Paolo Capriotti, in his PhD thesis "Models of Type Theory with Strict
Equality" [1], has studied strict equality in type theory.

From page 69:

"Finally, universes in the strict fragment of our system are not assumed
to be fibrant types, like in HTS."

You might be interested in Section 4.1.1, "Differences with HTS".

[1] https://arxiv.org/abs/1702.04912

  reply	other threads:[~2017-02-23 14:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-02-23 14:47 Vladimir Voevodsky
2017-02-23 14:57 ` Benedikt Ahrens [this message]
2017-02-23 18:08   ` [HoTT] " Vladimir Voevodsky
2017-02-23 18:52     ` Benedikt Ahrens
2017-02-23 21:45       ` Vladimir Voevodsky
     [not found]         ` <87k28fek09.fsf@capriotti.io>
2017-02-24 14:36           ` [UniMath] " Vladimir Voevodsky
2017-02-24 15:06             ` Paolo Capriotti
2017-02-24 15:10               ` Vladimir Voevodsky
2017-03-10 13:35             ` HIT Thierry Coquand
2017-02-24 14:36         ` [HoTT] about the HTS Paolo Capriotti
2017-02-25 19:19 ` Thierry Coquand
2017-02-27 18:50   ` [UniMath] " Vladimir Voevodsky
2017-02-27 18:53     ` Vladimir Voevodsky
2017-02-27 18:58       ` Thierry Coquand
2017-02-28  2:17         ` Vladimir Voevodsky
2017-03-01 20:23           ` Thierry Coquand
2017-03-20 15:12 ` Matt Oliveri
2017-03-22 16:49   ` [HoTT] " Thierry Coquand
2017-03-22 21:01     ` Vladimir Voevodsky
2017-03-23 11:22       ` Matt Oliveri
2017-03-23 11:33         ` Michael Shulman
2017-03-23 12:16           ` Matt Oliveri

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=484524d2-4054-5b7a-14af-e68a8e4b8375@gmail.com \
    --to="benedik..."@gmail.com \
    --cc="homotopyt..."@googlegroups.com \
    --cc="univalent-..."@googlegroups.com \
    --cc="vlad..."@ias.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).