Discussion of Homotopy Type Theory and Univalent Foundations
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thierry Coquand <Thierry...@cse.gu.se>
To: Thomas Streicher <stre...@mathematik.tu-darmstadt.de>
Cc: Homotopy Type Theory <homotopyt...@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [HoTT] A small observation on cumulativity and the failure of initiality
Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2017 08:37:54 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <61005fc37ae1495bb2038467222db2e7@cse.gu.se> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171015074530.GA29437@mathematik.tu-darmstadt.de>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2020 bytes --]

 A quite detailed interpretation of type theory in set theory is presented

in the paper of Peter Aczel "On Relating Type Theories and Set Theories".

On can define directly the interpretation of lambda terms (provided that abstraction is

typed), and using set theoretic coding, one can use a global application operation

(so that the interpretation is total). One can then checked by induction on derivations

that all judgements are valid for this interpretation.


 Thierry

________________________________
From: homotopyt...@googlegroups.com <homotopyt...@googlegroups.com> on behalf of Thomas Streicher <stre...@mathematik.tu-darmstadt.de>
Sent: Sunday, October 15, 2017 9:45:30 AM
To: Gabriel Scherer
Cc: Michael Shulman; Steve Awodey; Dimitris Tsementzis; Homotopy Type Theory
Subject: Re: [HoTT] A small observation on cumulativity and the failure of initiality

It is certainly tempting to assign meanings to derivations and then to
show that different derivations of the same judgement get assigned the
same meaning.
When writing my thesis in the second half of the 80s I found this too
difficult and instead used an a priori partial interpretation
function assigning meaning to prejudgements. It was then part of the
correctness theorem that all derivable judgements get assigned a meaning.

Most people have gone this way at least when they took pains to write
down the interpretation function at all.

BTW the above allows one to show that assigning a meaning to derivations
just depends on the judgement: one jyust has to show that the meaning
assigned to a derivation of a judgement J coincides with the meaning
assigned to J beforehand.

Thomas













--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Homotopy Type Theory" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to HomotopyTypeThe...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 3362 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2017-10-15  8:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-10-12 18:43 Dimitris Tsementzis
2017-10-12 22:31 ` [HoTT] " Michael Shulman
2017-10-13  4:30   ` Dimitris Tsementzis
2017-10-13 15:41     ` Michael Shulman
2017-10-13 21:51       ` Dimitris Tsementzis
2017-10-13  0:09 ` Steve Awodey
2017-10-13  0:44   ` Alexander Altman
2017-10-13 15:50   ` Michael Shulman
2017-10-13 16:17     ` Steve Awodey
2017-10-13 16:23       ` Michael Shulman
2017-10-13 16:36         ` Matt Oliveri
2017-10-14 14:56         ` Gabriel Scherer
2017-10-15  7:45           ` Thomas Streicher
2017-10-15  8:37             ` Thierry Coquand [this message]
2017-10-15  9:26               ` Thomas Streicher
2017-10-16  5:30                 ` Andrew Polonsky
2017-10-15 10:12             ` Michael Shulman
2017-10-15 13:57               ` Thomas Streicher
2017-10-15 14:53                 ` Michael Shulman
2017-10-15 16:00                   ` Michael Shulman
2017-10-15 21:00                     ` Matt Oliveri
2017-10-16  5:09                       ` Michael Shulman
2017-10-16 12:30                         ` Neel Krishnaswami
2017-10-16 13:35                           ` Matt Oliveri
2017-10-16 15:00                           ` Michael Shulman
2017-10-16 16:34                             ` Matt Oliveri
2017-10-16 13:45                         ` Matt Oliveri
2017-10-16 15:05                           ` Michael Shulman
2017-10-16 16:20                             ` Matt Oliveri
2017-10-16 16:37                               ` Michael Shulman
2017-10-16 10:01                   ` Thomas Streicher
2017-10-15 20:06     ` Matt Oliveri
2017-10-13  8:03 ` Peter LeFanu Lumsdaine
2017-10-13  8:10   ` Thomas Streicher
2017-10-14  7:33     ` Thorsten Altenkirch
2017-10-14  9:37       ` Andrej Bauer
2017-10-14  9:52         ` Thomas Streicher
2017-10-14 10:51           ` SV: " Erik Palmgren
2017-10-15 23:42           ` Andrej Bauer
2017-10-15 10:42         ` Thorsten Altenkirch
2017-10-13 22:05   ` Dimitris Tsementzis
2017-10-13 14:12 ` Robin Adams
     [not found] <B14E498C-FA19-41D2-B196-42FAF85F8CD8@princeton.edu>
2017-10-14  9:55 ` [HoTT] " Alexander Altman
2017-10-16 10:21 Thorsten Altenkirch
2017-10-16 10:42 ` Andrew Polonsky
2017-10-16 14:12   ` Thorsten Altenkirch
2017-10-16 10:21 Thorsten Altenkirch

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=61005fc37ae1495bb2038467222db2e7@cse.gu.se \
    --to="thierry..."@cse.gu.se \
    --cc="homotopyt..."@googlegroups.com \
    --cc="stre..."@mathematik.tu-darmstadt.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).