Re: help with spam.el

[Ted Zlatanov <tzz@lifelogs.com>]

On Fri, 28 Mar 2003, shaoz@activesky.com wrote:
> Please see my reply to an earlier article in this thread. My problem
> is that I set the spam-split-group to be nnfolder+archive:spam which
> turns out to be nnimap+xyz:nnfolder+archive:spam

There is no way to do this in Gnus, as far as I know.  The feature
should be possible, though - I suggest making a separate post with the
request, as it's not directly related to spam.el.

> my problem 1:
> 
> nnimap+private:~/Mail/inbox is spam split into
> nnimap+private:~/Mail/spam nnimap:work:~/Mail/inbox is spam split
> into nnimap+work:~/Mail/spam Manually marked articles are processed
> into nnfolder+archive:spam
> 
> I would like to have all these spams end up in one folder only. I
> cannot find a way to specify that at the moment.

As above, I don't know of a way to do this.  You could use nnkiboze or
nnvirtual to merge several groups into one virtual group.

> my problem 2:
> 
> Sometimes, spam split wrongly puts some hams in ~/Mail/spam. I tried
> to mark the article as unread, but it still does not transfer the
> article back to ~/Mail/inbox given I have set the
> ham-process-destinations.

Just to check, what does 

(spam-group-spam-contents-p "nnimap+private:~/Mail/spam") say?

ham-process-destination only works in spam groups, but it seems that
you have it set up correctly from what you posted.  If that returns
t, you'll have to trace through spam-summary-prepare-exit and see if
spam-ham-move-routine is getting invoked properly.

Thanks
Ted