Re: help with spam.el

[Shao Zhang <shaoz@activesky.com>]

On [Thu, 27 Mar 2003 12:45:17 -0500], Ted Zlatanov <tzz@lifelogs.com> wrote:
> That's probably because you have not trained ifile yet!  Try
> spam-use-blackholes for instance, you can use it in addition to
> spam-use-ifile and it will catch quite a lot of spam.

Please see my reply to an earlier article in this thread. My problem is
that I set the spam-split-group to be nnfolder+archive:spam which turns
out to be nnimap+xyz:nnfolder+archive:spam

I am now almost there, except a few small problems.
Here is my latest config:

'(gnus-ham-process-destinations (quote ((".*spam" "nnimap:~/Mail/inbox"))))
'(gnus-spam-newsgroup-contents (quote ((".*spam" gnus-group-spam-classification-spam) (".*inbox" gnus-group-spam-classification-ham))))
'(gnus-spam-process-destinations (quote (("nnimap.*" "nnfolder+archive:spam"))))
'(gnus-spam-process-newsgroups (quote ((".*" (gnus-group-spam-exit-processor-ifile gnus-group-ham-exit-processor-ifile)))))
'(spam-ifile-ham-category "ham")
'(spam-junk-mailgroups (quote ("nnfolder+archive:spam")))
'(spam-mark-ham-unread-before-move-from-spam-group nil)
'(spam-split-group "~/Mail/spam")
'(spam-use-ifile t))

my problem 1:

nnimap+private:~/Mail/inbox is spam split into nnimap+private:~/Mail/spam
nnimap:work:~/Mail/inbox is spam split into nnimap+work:~/Mail/spam
Manually marked articles are processed into nnfolder+archive:spam

I would like to have all these spams end up in one folder only. I cannot
find a way to specify that at the moment.

my problem 2:

Sometimes, spam split wrongly puts some hams in ~/Mail/spam. I tried to
mark the article as unread, but it still does not transfer the article
back to ~/Mail/inbox given I have set the ham-process-destinations.

Thanks for your help in advance.

Shao.