mailing list of musl libc
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Paul Eggert <eggert@cs.ucla.edu>
To: Jakub Wilk <jwilk@jwilk.net>
Cc: "A. Wilcox" <AWilcox@wilcox-tech.com>,
	libc-coord@lists.openwall.com,
	Jonathan Wakely <jwakely@redhat.com>,
	Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>,
	linux-man@vger.kernel.org, libc-alpha@sourceware.org,
	musl@lists.openwall.com
Subject: Re: [musl] Re: [libc-coord] Re: regression in man pages for interfaces using loff_t
Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2023 14:35:39 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <0101bd69-1c8d-dcf2-f60d-ff5a984b7566@cs.ucla.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230703181659.la7gx5nx4qar6r2v@jwilk.net>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 819 bytes --]

On 2023-07-03 11:16, Jakub Wilk wrote:
>> -This format is employed in cases where only a single
>> -feature test macro can be used to expose the function
>> -declaration, and that macro is not defined by default.
>> +This format is employed in cases where feature macros
>> +expose the function declaration with the correct type,
>> +and these macros are not defined by default.
> 
> This isn't right. The shorthand format is sometimes used when there's no 
> off(64)_t involved, e.g. in memfd_create(2).

Fair enough. Let's improve that wording to:

This format is employed when the feature test macros ensure that the 
proper function declarations are visible, and the macros are not defined 
by default.

Revised patch attached. If this wording is still not clear enough, 
please feel free to suggest better wording.

[-- Attachment #2: 0001-off64_t-prefer-off_t-for-splice-etc.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 8707 bytes --]

From cc84309bafceb801293448f1681f99daa4943817 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Eggert <eggert@cs.ucla.edu>
Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2023 14:32:06 -0700
Subject: [PATCH v3] off64_t: prefer off_t for splice, etc.

For the few functions that come only in 64-bit off_t flavors,
document their APIs as using off_t instead of off64_t,
and say also that code should #define _FILE_OFFSET_BITS 64.
This documents what user code is (and should be) doing anyway,
if it needs to work on traditional x86 and ARM Linux.
---
 man2/copy_file_range.2     | 20 +++++++++++++++++---
 man2/readahead.2           | 11 ++++++++++-
 man2/splice.2              | 17 +++++++++++++++--
 man2/sync_file_range.2     | 12 ++++++++++--
 man3/fopencookie.3         | 17 ++++++++++++++---
 man7/feature_test_macros.7 | 12 ++++++++----
 6 files changed, 74 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/man2/copy_file_range.2 b/man2/copy_file_range.2
index 6f3aa4971..42b950d66 100644
--- a/man2/copy_file_range.2
+++ b/man2/copy_file_range.2
@@ -11,10 +11,11 @@ Standard C library
 .SH SYNOPSIS
 .nf
 .B #define _GNU_SOURCE
+.B #define _FILE_OFFSET_BITS 64
 .B #include <unistd.h>
 .PP
-.BI "ssize_t copy_file_range(int " fd_in ", off64_t *_Nullable " off_in ,
-.BI "                        int " fd_out ", off64_t *_Nullable " off_out ,
+.BI "ssize_t copy_file_range(int " fd_in ", off_t *_Nullable " off_in ,
+.BI "                        int " fd_out ", off_t *_Nullable " off_out ,
 .BI "                        size_t " len ", unsigned int " flags );
 .fi
 .SH DESCRIPTION
@@ -224,6 +225,18 @@ gives filesystems an opportunity to implement "copy acceleration" techniques,
 such as the use of reflinks (i.e., two or more inodes that share
 pointers to the same copy-on-write disk blocks)
 or server-side-copy (in the case of NFS).
+.PP
+.B _FILE_OFFSET_BITS
+should be defined to be 64 in code that uses non-null
+.I off_in
+or
+.I off_out
+or that takes the address of
+.BR copy_file_range ,
+if the code is intended to be portable
+to traditional 32-bit x86 and ARM platforms where
+.BR off_t 's
+width defaults to 32 bits.
 .SH BUGS
 In Linux 5.3 to Linux 5.18,
 cross-filesystem copies were implemented by the kernel,
@@ -234,6 +247,7 @@ the call failed to copy, while still reporting success.
 .\" SRC BEGIN (copy_file_range.c)
 .EX
 #define _GNU_SOURCE
+#define _FILE_OFFSET_BITS 64
 #include <fcntl.h>
 #include <stdio.h>
 #include <stdlib.h>
@@ -244,7 +258,7 @@ int
 main(int argc, char *argv[])
 {
     int          fd_in, fd_out;
-    off64_t      len, ret;
+    off_t        len, ret;
     struct stat  stat;
 \&
     if (argc != 3) {
diff --git a/man2/readahead.2 b/man2/readahead.2
index d69795979..64e57cdca 100644
--- a/man2/readahead.2
+++ b/man2/readahead.2
@@ -14,9 +14,10 @@ Standard C library
 .SH SYNOPSIS
 .nf
 .BR "#define _GNU_SOURCE" "             /* See feature_test_macros(7) */"
+.B #define _FILE_OFFSET_BITS 64
 .B #include <fcntl.h>
 .PP
-.BI "ssize_t readahead(int " fd ", off64_t " offset ", size_t " count );
+.BI "ssize_t readahead(int " fd ", off_t " offset ", size_t " count );
 .fi
 .SH DESCRIPTION
 .BR readahead ()
@@ -73,6 +74,14 @@ Linux.
 .SH HISTORY
 Linux 2.4.13,
 glibc 2.3.
+.SH NOTES
+.B _FILE_OFFSET_BITS
+should be defined to be 64 in code that uses a pointer to
+.BR readahead ,
+if the code is intended to be portable
+to traditional 32-bit x86 and ARM platforms where
+.BR off_t 's
+width defaults to 32 bits.
 .SH BUGS
 .BR readahead ()
 attempts to schedule the reads in the background and return immediately.
diff --git a/man2/splice.2 b/man2/splice.2
index dd78e8cd4..cd4ed35cb 100644
--- a/man2/splice.2
+++ b/man2/splice.2
@@ -12,10 +12,11 @@ Standard C library
 .SH SYNOPSIS
 .nf
 .BR "#define _GNU_SOURCE" "         /* See feature_test_macros(7) */"
+.B "#define _FILE_OFFSET_BITS 64
 .B #include <fcntl.h>
 .PP
-.BI "ssize_t splice(int " fd_in ", off64_t *_Nullable " off_in ,
-.BI "               int " fd_out ", off64_t *_Nullable " off_out ,
+.BI "ssize_t splice(int " fd_in ", off_t *_Nullable " off_in ,
+.BI "               int " fd_out ", off_t *_Nullable " off_out ,
 .BI "               size_t " len ", unsigned int " flags );
 .\" Return type was long before glibc 2.7
 .fi
@@ -242,6 +243,18 @@ only pointers are copied, not the pages of the buffer.
 .\" the data and choose to forward it to two or more different
 .\" users - for things like logging etc.).
 .\"
+.PP
+.B _FILE_OFFSET_BITS
+should be defined to be 64 in code that uses non-null
+.I off_in
+or
+.I off_out
+or that takes the address of
+.BR splice ,
+if the code is intended to be portable
+to traditional 32-bit x86 and ARM platforms where
+.BR off_t 's
+width defaults to 32 bits.
 .SH EXAMPLES
 See
 .BR tee (2).
diff --git a/man2/sync_file_range.2 b/man2/sync_file_range.2
index d633b08ff..31d7e5112 100644
--- a/man2/sync_file_range.2
+++ b/man2/sync_file_range.2
@@ -16,9 +16,10 @@ Standard C library
 .SH SYNOPSIS
 .nf
 .BR "#define _GNU_SOURCE" "         /* See feature_test_macros(7) */"
+.B #define _FILE_OFFSET_BITS 64
 .B #include <fcntl.h>
 .PP
-.BI "int sync_file_range(int " fd ", off64_t " offset ", off64_t " nbytes ,
+.BI "int sync_file_range(int " fd ", off_t " offset ", off_t " nbytes ,
 .BI "                    unsigned int " flags );
 .fi
 .SH DESCRIPTION
@@ -176,7 +177,7 @@ system call that orders the arguments suitably:
 .in +4n
 .EX
 .BI "int sync_file_range2(int " fd ", unsigned int " flags ,
-.BI "                     off64_t " offset ", off64_t " nbytes );
+.BI "                     off_t " offset ", off_t " nbytes );
 .EE
 .in
 .PP
@@ -198,6 +199,13 @@ glibc transparently wraps
 under the name
 .BR sync_file_range ().
 .SH NOTES
+.B _FILE_OFFSET_BITS
+should be defined to be 64 in code that takes the address of
+.BR sync_file_range ,
+if the code is intended to be portable
+to traditional 32-bit x86 and ARM platforms where
+.BR off_t 's
+width defaults to 32 bits.
 .SH SEE ALSO
 .BR fdatasync (2),
 .BR fsync (2),
diff --git a/man3/fopencookie.3 b/man3/fopencookie.3
index 409a3c81a..3a68746cc 100644
--- a/man3/fopencookie.3
+++ b/man3/fopencookie.3
@@ -13,6 +13,7 @@ Standard C library
 .SH SYNOPSIS
 .nf
 .BR "#define _GNU_SOURCE" "         /* See feature_test_macros(7) */"
+.B #define _FILE_OFFSET_BITS 64
 .B #include <stdio.h>
 .PP
 .BI "FILE *fopencookie(void *restrict " cookie ", const char *restrict " mode ,
@@ -169,7 +170,7 @@ When called, it receives three arguments:
 .IP
 .in +4n
 .EX
-int seek(void *cookie, off64_t *offset, int whence);
+int seek(void *cookie, off_t *offset, int whence);
 .EE
 .in
 .IP
@@ -351,9 +352,9 @@ memfile_read(void *c, char *buf, size_t size)
 }
 \&
 int
-memfile_seek(void *c, off64_t *offset, int whence)
+memfile_seek(void *c, off_t *offset, int whence)
 {
-    off64_t new_offset;
+    off_t new_offset;
     struct memfile_cookie *cookie = c;
 \&
     if (whence == SEEK_SET)
@@ -451,6 +452,16 @@ main(int argc, char *argv[])
 }
 .EE
 .\" SRC END
+.SH NOTES
+.B _FILE_OFFSET_BITS
+should be defined to be 64 in code that uses non-null
+.I seek
+or that takes the address of
+.BR fopencookie ,
+if the code is intended to be portable
+to traditional 32-bit x86 and ARM platforms where
+.BR off_t 's
+width defaults to 32 bits.
 .SH SEE ALSO
 .BR fclose (3),
 .BR fmemopen (3),
diff --git a/man7/feature_test_macros.7 b/man7/feature_test_macros.7
index f1620611c..10e973dbc 100644
--- a/man7/feature_test_macros.7
+++ b/man7/feature_test_macros.7
@@ -113,15 +113,16 @@ feature test macro requirements (this example from
 .RS +4
 .EX
 .B #define _GNU_SOURCE
+.B #define _FILE_OFFSET_BITS 64
 .B #include <fcntl.h>
 .PP
-.BI "ssize_t readahead(int " fd ", off64_t *" offset ", size_t " count );
+.BI "ssize_t readahead(int " fd ", off_t *" offset ", size_t " count );
 .EE
 .RE
 .PP
-This format is employed in cases where only a single
-feature test macro can be used to expose the function
-declaration, and that macro is not defined by default.
+This format is employed when the feature test macros ensure
+that the proper function declarations are visible,
+and the macros are not defined by default.
 .SS Feature test macros understood by glibc
 The paragraphs below explain how feature test macros are handled
 in glibc 2.\fIx\fP,
@@ -406,6 +407,9 @@ related to file I/O and filesystem operations into references to
 their 64-bit counterparts.
 This is useful for performing I/O on large files (> 2 Gigabytes)
 on 32-bit systems.
+It is also useful when calling functions like
+.BR copy_file_range (2)
+that were added more recently and that come only in 64-bit flavors.
 (Defining this macro permits correctly written programs to use
 large files with only a recompilation being required.)
 .IP
-- 
2.41.0


  reply	other threads:[~2023-07-03 21:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-06-28 17:53 [musl] " Rich Felker
2023-06-28 18:21 ` [musl] " Paul Eggert
2023-06-28 19:15   ` Rich Felker
2023-06-30  7:11     ` Paul Eggert
2023-06-30  8:02       ` [musl] Re: [libc-coord] " Jonathan Wakely
2023-06-30  8:14         ` Jonathan Wakely
2023-06-30  8:30           ` Sam James
2023-06-30 19:44         ` Paul Eggert
2023-07-02  1:18           ` A. Wilcox
2023-07-02 19:21             ` Paul Eggert
2023-07-03 18:16               ` Jakub Wilk
2023-07-03 21:35                 ` Paul Eggert [this message]
2023-07-08 17:03                   ` Alejandro Colomar
2023-07-09  6:07                     ` [musl] [PATCH v4] off64_t: prefer off_t for splice, etc Paul Eggert
2023-07-09  6:16                       ` [musl] Re: [libc-coord] " Sam James
2023-07-15 15:08                         ` Alejandro Colomar
2023-07-15 18:35                           ` Rich Felker
2023-07-15 20:01                             ` Paul Eggert
2023-07-16  0:35                             ` Alejandro Colomar
2023-07-16  0:39                               ` Alejandro Colomar
2023-06-30 23:37       ` [musl] Re: regression in man pages for interfaces using loff_t Rich Felker
2023-07-01  7:24         ` [musl] Re: [libc-coord] " Paul Eggert
2023-07-01 13:36           ` Szabolcs Nagy
2023-07-01 23:02             ` Paul Eggert
2023-07-01 14:32           ` Rich Felker
2023-07-01 18:45             ` Alejandro Colomar
2023-07-01 23:06             ` Paul Eggert
2023-06-28 19:19   ` Szabolcs Nagy
2023-06-28 19:28   ` Rich Felker

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=0101bd69-1c8d-dcf2-f60d-ff5a984b7566@cs.ucla.edu \
    --to=eggert@cs.ucla.edu \
    --cc=AWilcox@wilcox-tech.com \
    --cc=dalias@libc.org \
    --cc=jwakely@redhat.com \
    --cc=jwilk@jwilk.net \
    --cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
    --cc=libc-coord@lists.openwall.com \
    --cc=linux-man@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=musl@lists.openwall.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.vuxu.org/mirror/musl/

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).