mailing list of musl libc
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely@redhat.com>
To: libc-coord@lists.openwall.com
Cc: Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>,
	linux-man@vger.kernel.org, musl@lists.openwall.com,
	 libc-alpha@sourceware.org
Subject: [musl] Re: [libc-coord] Re: regression in man pages for interfaces using loff_t
Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2023 09:14:44 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CACb0b4=uq=Sa=SdqbAu4KovfsJfowm6cz4tjyQ-YYaHX9z_Fxg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACb0b4nkLFOi4q=SSBSD_7aH4FRt9H4sRHQz6wF5O-x9PiwnFA@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, 30 Jun 2023 at 09:02, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>
> On Fri, 30 Jun 2023 at 08:11, Paul Eggert wrote:
>>
>> On 2023-06-28 12:15, Rich Felker wrote:
>>
>> > There's also the problem that off64_t is "exactly 64-bit" which makes
>> > it unsuitable as an interface type for cross-platform functions where
>> > one could imagine the native type being larger (rather horrifying but
>> > possible).
>>
>> Although we won't have files with 2**63 bytes any time soon, this is the
>> best argument for preferring "loff_t" to "off64_t".
>>
>> But come to think of it, it'd be better to document the type simply as
>> "off_t", with a footnote saying the equivalent of "this assumes that on
>> 32-bit glibc platforms you compile with -DFILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 like any
>> sane person would." The intent really is off_t here, and that will
>> remain true even if off_t ever widens past 64 bits.
>>
>> All the apps I know that use the syscalls in question simply pass
>> values that fit in off_t to these functions, and this will work
>> regardless of whether these apps are compiled with 64- or (horrors!)
>> 32-bit off_t. Admittedly the footnote solution would not be perfect, but
>> it's good enough, and it would sidestep the loff_t vs off64_t confusion.
>
>
> For APIs like copy_file_range(2) and splice(2) the arguments are loff_t* so you can't just "pass arguments that fit in off_t" to them. You have to get the pointer type correct, because writing 64-bits through a 32-bit off_t would be bad. And in C++ it won't even compile unless you get the pointer types exactly right (C compilers will typically allow the mismatch with just a warning).
>
> People miss footnotes. I would really prefer if the signature shown in the man page used a type that will actually compile. If it shows off_t, that won't compile for 32-bit systems without LFS support enabled.

Apologies for sending the mail above as HTML - replying as text/plain
for those it didn't reach.


  reply	other threads:[~2023-06-30  8:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-06-28 17:53 [musl] " Rich Felker
2023-06-28 18:21 ` [musl] " Paul Eggert
2023-06-28 19:15   ` Rich Felker
2023-06-30  7:11     ` Paul Eggert
2023-06-30  8:02       ` [musl] Re: [libc-coord] " Jonathan Wakely
2023-06-30  8:14         ` Jonathan Wakely [this message]
2023-06-30  8:30           ` Sam James
2023-06-30 19:44         ` Paul Eggert
2023-07-02  1:18           ` A. Wilcox
2023-07-02 19:21             ` Paul Eggert
2023-07-03 18:16               ` Jakub Wilk
2023-07-03 21:35                 ` Paul Eggert
2023-07-08 17:03                   ` Alejandro Colomar
2023-07-09  6:07                     ` [musl] [PATCH v4] off64_t: prefer off_t for splice, etc Paul Eggert
2023-07-09  6:16                       ` [musl] Re: [libc-coord] " Sam James
2023-07-15 15:08                         ` Alejandro Colomar
2023-07-15 18:35                           ` Rich Felker
2023-07-15 20:01                             ` Paul Eggert
2023-07-16  0:35                             ` Alejandro Colomar
2023-07-16  0:39                               ` Alejandro Colomar
2023-06-30 23:37       ` [musl] Re: regression in man pages for interfaces using loff_t Rich Felker
2023-07-01  7:24         ` [musl] Re: [libc-coord] " Paul Eggert
2023-07-01 13:36           ` Szabolcs Nagy
2023-07-01 23:02             ` Paul Eggert
2023-07-01 14:32           ` Rich Felker
2023-07-01 18:45             ` Alejandro Colomar
2023-07-01 23:06             ` Paul Eggert
2023-06-28 19:19   ` Szabolcs Nagy
2023-06-28 19:28   ` Rich Felker

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CACb0b4=uq=Sa=SdqbAu4KovfsJfowm6cz4tjyQ-YYaHX9z_Fxg@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=jwakely@redhat.com \
    --cc=dalias@libc.org \
    --cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
    --cc=libc-coord@lists.openwall.com \
    --cc=linux-man@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=musl@lists.openwall.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.vuxu.org/mirror/musl/

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).