From: Luca Barbato <lu_zero@gentoo.org>
To: musl@lists.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Best bikeshed ever (feature test macros)
Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2012 11:11:05 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <503896A9.9010907@gentoo.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120824214138.GA17792@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
On 8/24/12 11:41 PM, Rich Felker wrote:
> Hi all,
> 1. Leaving everything as it is.
>
> PROS: Obtaining conforming standard C environment is easy. Detecting
> (for the purpose of flaming or fixing) programs failing to use feature
> test macros correctly is also easy.
>
> CONS: Basically every program requires a feature test macro to be
> added to CFLAGS in order to compile it. Using -D_GNU_SOURCE works 99%
> of the time, but the other 1% of the time it will _break_ programs
> that are already correctly using -D_XOPEN_SOURCE=700 or similar by
> introducing nonstandard functions that pollute the namespace and
> conflict with the application. Thus it becomes really hard to have a
> universal working build procedure. It's also very hard to work around
> broken build systems (like GCC's bootstrapping) that refuse to honor
> your custom CFLAGS.
Would be nice to see which would require something more first. The
current musl seems working decently as-is.
lu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-08-25 9:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-08-24 21:41 Rich Felker
2012-08-24 22:24 ` Gregor Richards
2012-08-24 23:59 ` Szabolcs Nagy
2012-08-25 7:35 ` orc
2012-08-25 12:32 ` Rich Felker
2012-08-25 15:29 ` orc
2012-08-25 9:11 ` Luca Barbato [this message]
2012-08-27 18:08 ` Isaac Dunham
2012-08-29 5:34 ` philomath
2012-08-29 13:49 ` Rich Felker
2012-08-29 14:01 ` Gregor Richards
2012-08-29 14:43 ` Rich Felker
2012-08-29 15:08 ` Bobby Bingham
2012-08-29 15:23 ` Rich Felker
2012-08-29 17:17 ` Gregor Richards
2012-08-29 17:59 ` Isaac Dunham
2012-08-29 18:08 ` Rich Felker
2012-09-02 8:48 ` Arvid E. Picciani
2012-09-02 15:19 ` Rich Felker
2012-09-02 15:27 ` Arvid E. Picciani
2012-09-02 15:44 ` Rich Felker
2012-09-02 17:00 ` nwmcsween
2012-09-02 17:06 ` Gregor Richards
2012-09-02 17:13 ` Rich Felker
2012-09-02 17:18 ` Gregor Richards
2012-09-02 17:10 ` Rich Felker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=503896A9.9010907@gentoo.org \
--to=lu_zero@gentoo.org \
--cc=musl@lists.openwall.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.vuxu.org/mirror/musl/
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).