From: Liam Proven <lproven@gmail.com>
To: tuhs@tuhs.org
Subject: [TUHS] Re: Clever code (was Re: Re: Stdin Redirect in Cu History/Alternatives?
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2022 12:57:47 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMTenCHyhkXp34vG9BNoTo_65u99EDwyr_avekB8i6Dt3+oK1g@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAD-qYGqA7vtc6KmyT2yPS98u5VMGKHkWBzwvZXDED3kPobW78w@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, 20 Dec 2022 at 09:31, Andrew Warkentin <andreww591@gmail.com> wrote:
> QNX Classic and 4.x only ran on x86 machines, most of which were
> either standard PCs or at least sort of PC-like (although AFAIK the
> ability to run without a BIOS was present very early on). It was quite
> common to run QNX on desktops as a development host for embedded
> systems AFAIK.
>
> GUIs for QNX predate the Amiga deal, and have existed since the late
> 80s. The original was QNX Windows, which was either a reimplementation
> or port (not quite sure which) of Open Look on a custom non-X11 window
> server, running on later versions of 2.x and all versions of 4.x.
>
> Later versions of 4.x added Photon 1, which looks like a cross between
> Motif and Windows 9x, again based on a custom window server (this time
> with a rather unconventional multi-process architecture). The 90s-era
> demo disk was based on 4.25 and Photon 1 (there was also a 2.x demo
> disk back in the 80s but this didn't have a GUI).
Fascinating. Thanks for setting the record straight, and I apologise
for my inaccurate speculation.
>
> 6.0 came with Photon 2, which is still Win9x-ish in terms of
> organization and is a fairly straightforward evolution of Photon 1,
> although the widgets look very vaguely Amiga-like in 6.0-6.2. 6.0 came
> out slightly after the Amiga deal, so that might be the reason for the
> Amiga-like theming.
>
> Neutrino was not the name of a GUI, but rather of the entire OS that
> succeeded QNX 4 (the first versions of Neutrino used Photon 1 but were
> incapable of self-hosting and were developed alongside 4.x; 6.0 was
> the first mainline QNX version to be Neutrino-based).
Aha!
> There were also the i-Opener (running 4.25) and Audrey (running 6.0)
> internet appliances of the late 90s.
I did not realise they were QNX devices. I vaguely thought the 3Com
Audrey was based on BeIA, in fact, but I must be confusing it with
something else -- perhaps the Sony eVilla.
--
Liam Proven ~ Profile: https://about.me/liamproven
Email: lproven@cix.co.uk ~ gMail/gTalk/FB: lproven@gmail.com
Twitter/LinkedIn: lproven ~ Skype: liamproven
UK: (+44) 7939-087884 ~ Czech [+ WhatsApp/Telegram/Signal]: (+420) 702-829-053
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-12-20 11:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-12-10 19:38 [TUHS] " segaloco via TUHS
2022-12-11 0:22 ` [TUHS] " Clem Cole
2022-12-11 2:37 ` segaloco via TUHS
2022-12-11 13:59 ` Michael Kjörling
2022-12-11 14:28 ` Steve Nickolas
2022-12-11 15:04 ` Dan Cross
2022-12-13 1:54 ` Larry McVoy
2022-12-11 17:18 ` Adam Thornton
2022-12-11 18:54 ` Michael Kjörling
2022-12-11 19:55 ` Dave Horsfall
2022-12-11 20:03 ` Larry McVoy
2022-12-11 23:22 ` segaloco via TUHS
2022-12-12 2:15 ` [TUHS] Clever code (was " Bakul Shah
2022-12-12 2:44 ` [TUHS] " Steve Nickolas
2022-12-12 3:09 ` Andrew Warkentin
2022-12-12 3:34 ` Larry McVoy
2022-12-12 5:00 ` Kevin Bowling
2022-12-12 5:26 ` Andrew Warkentin
2022-12-12 15:02 ` Larry McVoy
2022-12-12 15:29 ` Clem Cole
2022-12-12 15:39 ` Dan Cross
2022-12-12 16:04 ` Larry McVoy
2022-12-12 16:26 ` Clem Cole
2022-12-12 22:20 ` Liam Proven
2022-12-12 23:10 ` segaloco via TUHS
2022-12-12 23:24 ` Larry McVoy
2022-12-13 2:00 ` Andrew Warkentin
2022-12-13 13:37 ` Larry McVoy
2022-12-13 23:00 ` Andrew Warkentin
2022-12-14 1:05 ` Larry McVoy
2022-12-14 1:40 ` segaloco via TUHS
2022-12-14 6:32 ` Rich Morin
2022-12-14 2:01 ` Andrew Warkentin
2022-12-14 7:49 ` arnold
2022-12-14 11:54 ` Brad Spencer
2022-12-14 12:08 ` [TUHS] Re: (TUHS -> COFF?) Re: Clever code Michael Kjörling
2022-12-14 15:14 ` [TUHS] Microware's OS-9 (was: Clever code) G. Branden Robinson
2022-12-14 22:41 ` [TUHS] " John Cowan
2022-12-14 9:46 ` [TUHS] Re: Clever code (was Re: Re: Stdin Redirect in Cu History/Alternatives? Harald Arnesen
2022-12-15 18:33 ` Liam Proven
2022-12-16 10:42 ` Harald Arnesen
2022-12-18 14:05 ` Liam Proven
2022-12-18 15:08 ` Stuff Received
2022-12-19 11:47 ` Liam Proven
2022-12-20 8:30 ` Andrew Warkentin
2022-12-20 11:57 ` Liam Proven [this message]
2022-12-15 0:29 ` Bakul Shah
2022-12-15 2:54 ` Larry McVoy
2022-12-15 5:36 ` Bakul Shah
2022-12-15 14:02 ` Dan Cross
2022-12-15 14:06 ` Larry McVoy
2022-12-15 14:18 ` Dan Cross
2022-12-15 14:02 ` Larry McVoy
2022-12-15 8:01 ` Andrew Warkentin
2022-12-12 9:48 ` [TUHS] Re: Clever code Michael Kjörling
2022-12-12 21:34 ` [TUHS] Re: Stdin Redirect in Cu History/Alternatives? Dave Horsfall
2022-12-12 21:46 ` Chet Ramey
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAMTenCHyhkXp34vG9BNoTo_65u99EDwyr_avekB8i6Dt3+oK1g@mail.gmail.com \
--to=lproven@gmail.com \
--cc=tuhs@tuhs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).