The Unix Heritage Society mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom Lyon <pugs78@gmail.com>
To: Paul Winalski <paul.winalski@gmail.com>
Cc: The Eunuchs Hysterical Society <tuhs@tuhs.org>
Subject: [TUHS] Re: Compatibility question
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2023 10:07:10 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CANxB0bQrrfk+AyrmUE0LS67jn1boE7vzpjYUfSCVn5p6yYdjKw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABH=_VSDD5sisytVYUsGaR7Gg_1K8=+f_DAPf41sqjFk4v8y_Q@mail.gmail.com>


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2108 bytes --]

Yes, Amdahl UTS supported the 1403 from earliest days.
There even seem to be some mods to 'tbl' to support it.

On Tue, Dec 19, 2023 at 9:40 AM Paul Winalski <paul.winalski@gmail.com>
wrote:

> On 12/18/23, Dave Horsfall <dave@horsfall.org> wrote:
> > On Mon, 18 Dec 2023, Paul Winalski wrote:
> >
> >> The 132-character screen width was for displaying files originally
> >> formatted to be printed on a line printer.  Compiler listings and linker
> >> maps, for example.
> >
> > Such as the mighty 1403 :-)
> >
> > Hint: never leave your cup of coffee on top of it, as the lid will open
> > automatically when it runs out of paper...
>
> The 1403 was the best line printer ever made.  It was originally the
> printer for the IBM 1400 second-generation (discrete transistor-based)
> computer.  It continued to be the line printer for S/360.  The deluxe
> model, the IBM 1403 N1, had a power cover that could be operated under
> computer control.  The OS/360 operating system would raise the
> printer's cover if an error condition occurred, such as out of paper
> or a paper jam.  This was a very useful feature in large data centers
> where there were several line printers, to indicate which printer had
> a problem.
>
> The cover of a 1403 N1 also provided a convenient and attractive flat
> surface on which to place things.  But a dangerous one.  Many a card
> deck magtape reel, coffee cup, or pizza box has been unceremoniously
> dumped on the floor.
>
> When our shop upgraded from a S/360 model 25 to a S/370 model 125, our
> 1403 was replaced by a 3203 line printer.  It was not as good as the
> 1401 had been.
>
> There was a business in Massachusetts in the 1980s that bought and
> sold old IBM computer gear.  A company asked them for a quote on their
> IBM 1400 system (1401 processor, 1402 card read/punch, 1403 printer).
> They were offered $18,000 for the whole system, or $15,000 for the
> 1403 printer alone.  That's how valued those printers were.
>
> To bring this closer on-topic, was there Unix support for the IBM 1403?
>
> -Paul W.
>

[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 2605 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Screenshot from 2023-12-19 09-57-38.png --]
[-- Type: image/png, Size: 12565 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2023-12-19 18:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-12-17  2:01 [TUHS] " KenUnix
2023-12-17 18:13 ` [TUHS] " Seth Morabito
2023-12-17 18:23   ` segaloco via TUHS
2023-12-17 22:51     ` Mary Ann Horton
2023-12-17 22:59       ` Ron Natalie
2023-12-17 23:08         ` Warner Losh
2023-12-18  0:35           ` KenUnix
2023-12-18  3:24             ` segaloco via TUHS
2023-12-18 17:05         ` Paul Winalski
2023-12-18 22:29           ` Jon Forrest
2023-12-19  1:46           ` Dave Horsfall
2023-12-19  7:56             ` Harald Arnesen
2023-12-19 17:40             ` Paul Winalski
2023-12-19 18:07               ` Tom Lyon [this message]
2023-12-19 20:23                 ` Clem Cole
2023-12-19 21:31                   ` Paul Winalski
2023-12-19 23:52                     ` Bakul Shah
2023-12-20  0:05                       ` Greg 'groggy' Lehey
2023-12-20  1:03                         ` Bakul Shah
2023-12-20  1:32                           ` Greg 'groggy' Lehey
2023-12-20  6:05                             ` Wesley Parish
2023-12-20  0:15                       ` Mary Ann Horton
2023-12-20 16:07                         ` Adam Thornton
2023-12-20 16:22                           ` Clem Cole
2023-12-20 18:11                           ` Alan D. Salewski
2023-12-20 16:34                         ` Paul Winalski
2023-12-20 18:15                           ` Jon Forrest
2023-12-20  1:11                       ` Steffen Nurpmeso
2023-12-20  1:23                         ` Tom Lyon
2023-12-21  3:53                     ` Rod Bartlett via TUHS
2023-12-19 21:34                   ` Rob Pike
2023-12-17  5:55 David Arnold
2023-12-17  8:08 ` segaloco via TUHS
2023-12-17 18:04   ` James Frew
2023-12-17 18:18     ` Lars Brinkhoff
2023-12-17 19:14       ` Brad Spencer
2023-12-17 18:48     ` Paul Winalski
2023-12-17 18:59       ` Warner Losh
2023-12-17 20:24       ` Dave Horsfall
2023-12-17 19:26     ` Dan Cross
2023-12-17 20:08       ` Warner Losh
2023-12-17 14:07 ` Brad Spencer
2023-12-17 14:47   ` Arrigo Triulzi via TUHS

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CANxB0bQrrfk+AyrmUE0LS67jn1boE7vzpjYUfSCVn5p6yYdjKw@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=pugs78@gmail.com \
    --cc=paul.winalski@gmail.com \
    --cc=tuhs@tuhs.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).