The Unix Heritage Society mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paul Ruizendaal via TUHS <tuhs@tuhs.org>
To: The Eunuchs Hysterical Society <tuhs@tuhs.org>
Subject: [TUHS] Re: LSX issues and musing
Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2022 21:35:23 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <E532D1AC-E214-4201-8C39-9B0AF9658296@planet.nl> (raw)


> Any ideas on why businesses didn’t pick up the H11 in 1980?
> 	[priced too high for hobbyists]
> 
> Wikipedia says:
> 
> 	1978: H11 US$1295 (kit) or US$1595 fully assembled ("4kword base system”) 
> 			display advert <http://www.decodesystems.com/heathkit-h11-ad-1.gif> $1295 kit + postage/freight, bare system, 8KB (4kword), 6 Q-bus slots free. ROM ?
> 
> 	1981: IBM 5150(PC) US$1,565 for "16 KB RAM, Color Graphics Adapter, and no disk drives.”
> 			( I only saw 5150’s with 2x 5.25” 360KB floppies included - otherwise, can’t run programs & store files)

Note that those are nominal prices. In terms of purchasing power USD 1595 in 1978 equated about USD 2200 in 1981 (https://www.in2013dollars.com/us/inflation/1978?endYear=1981&amount=1595).

Otherwise agree with your observation on packaged, off-the-shelf software being the main driver. In small business before the IBM PC, Visicalc drove Apple II uptake; Wordstar, C-Basic 2 and DBase drove CP/M uptake.

Would LSI-11 hardware with LSX, ed and nroff have been competitive in small business? The experiences of John Walker (of AutoCAD fame) suggests not:

https://www.fourmilab.ch/documents/marinchip/


             reply	other threads:[~2022-08-05  4:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-08-05  4:35 Paul Ruizendaal via TUHS [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2022-08-03 15:17 Noel Chiappa
2022-07-31 19:57 Noel Chiappa
2022-08-01  5:37 ` Heinz Lycklama
2022-08-02 17:56   ` Gavin Tersteeg
2022-08-03  4:32     ` steve jenkin
2022-08-03  4:55       ` Ron Natalie
2022-08-03  5:09       ` G. Branden Robinson
2022-07-11 23:47 Noel Chiappa
2022-07-15  8:07 ` Gavin Tersteeg
2022-07-27  8:02   ` Gavin Tersteeg
2022-07-27 16:24     ` Heinz Lycklama
2022-07-30  4:39       ` Gavin Tersteeg
2022-07-11 21:47 Paul Ruizendaal via TUHS
2022-07-11 21:24 Noel Chiappa
2022-07-11 21:37 ` Gavin Tersteeg
2022-07-11 21:06 Noel Chiappa
2022-07-11 19:47 [TUHS] " Gavin Tersteeg
2022-07-11 20:01 ` [TUHS] " Warner Losh
2022-07-11 20:26   ` Clem Cole
2022-07-11 20:30     ` Warner Losh
2022-07-11 20:37 ` Phil Budne

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=E532D1AC-E214-4201-8C39-9B0AF9658296@planet.nl \
    --to=tuhs@tuhs.org \
    --cc=pnr@planet.nl \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).