From: Mathias Krause <minipli@grsecurity.net>
To: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>
Cc: WireGuard mailing list <wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] wireguard-linux-compat: grsecurity compat patches
Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2021 15:04:34 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3a2d41dc-effb-158c-4a52-d7eb282ecb7e@grsecurity.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHmME9oyopU8euSuVy7su91fia6xG5V+9i+QodCBdTGdR_rD5Q@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Jason,
Am 03.12.21 um 23:20 schrieb Jason A. Donenfeld:
> This resulted in kind of an interesting regression with old compilers
> on old kernel versions when I backported this to
> wireguard-linux-compat:
> https://git.zx2c4.com/wireguard-linux-compat/commit/?id=8118c247a75ae95169f0a9a539dfc661ffda8bc5
>
> The 25519 tests fail for 4.8.17, 4.7.10, 4.6.7, 4.5.7 with gcc 6:
>
> https://build.wireguard.com/wireguard-linux-compat/e8db181d62467da6c476cf4ac21e13dd477612c8/4.8.17-x86_64.log
> https://build.wireguard.com/wireguard-linux-compat/e8db181d62467da6c476cf4ac21e13dd477612c8/4.7.10-x86_64.log
> https://build.wireguard.com/wireguard-linux-compat/e8db181d62467da6c476cf4ac21e13dd477612c8/4.6.7-x86_64.log
> https://build.wireguard.com/wireguard-linux-compat/e8db181d62467da6c476cf4ac21e13dd477612c8/4.5.7-x86_64.log
>
> But then they crash for 4.0.9, 3.19.8, 3.17.8 with gcc 5:
>
> https://build.wireguard.com/wireguard-linux-compat/e8db181d62467da6c476cf4ac21e13dd477612c8/4.0.9-x86_64.log
> https://build.wireguard.com/wireguard-linux-compat/e8db181d62467da6c476cf4ac21e13dd477612c8/3.19.8-x86_64.log
> https://build.wireguard.com/wireguard-linux-compat/e8db181d62467da6c476cf4ac21e13dd477612c8/3.17.8-x86_64.log
>
> And also crash with 3.16.85, 3.15.10, 3.14.79, 3.12.74, 3.11.10 with gcc 4:
>
> https://build.wireguard.com/wireguard-linux-compat/e8db181d62467da6c476cf4ac21e13dd477612c8/3.16.85-x86_64.log
> https://build.wireguard.com/wireguard-linux-compat/e8db181d62467da6c476cf4ac21e13dd477612c8/3.15.10-x86_64.log
> https://build.wireguard.com/wireguard-linux-compat/e8db181d62467da6c476cf4ac21e13dd477612c8/3.14.79-x86_64.log
> https://build.wireguard.com/wireguard-linux-compat/e8db181d62467da6c476cf4ac21e13dd477612c8/3.13.11-x86_64.log
> https://build.wireguard.com/wireguard-linux-compat/e8db181d62467da6c476cf4ac21e13dd477612c8/3.12.74-x86_64.log
> https://build.wireguard.com/wireguard-linux-compat/e8db181d62467da6c476cf4ac21e13dd477612c8/3.11.10-x86_64.log
>
> Any intuition about what might have happened?
Sorry to hear that. I didn't ran into such issues when doing the
backport and, in fact, trying to reproduce the selftest errors / crashes
failed so far on v4.8.17 with gcc 6.3 and 4.6.3:
[ 0.137871] wireguard: chacha20 self-tests: pass
[ 0.141106] wireguard: poly1305 self-tests: pass
[ 0.141604] wireguard: chacha20poly1305 self-tests: pass
[ 0.142309] wireguard: blake2s self-tests: pass
[ 0.157012] wireguard: curve25519 self-tests: pass
[ 0.157430] wireguard: allowedips self-tests: pass
[ 0.158354] wireguard: nonce counter self-tests: pass
[ 0.388426] wireguard: ratelimiter self-tests: pass
[ 0.389045] wireguard: WireGuard 1.0.20210606 loaded. See
www.wireguard.com for information.
[ 0.389874] wireguard: Copyright (C) 2015-2019 Jason A. Donenfeld
<Jason@zx2c4.com>. All Rights Reserved.
I'll try older kernels and see if they trigger. In case not, can you
send me the object files of a failing kernel?
Thanks,
Mathias
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-12-06 14:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-06 13:27 Mathias Krause
2021-07-06 13:27 ` [PATCH 1/2] compat: better grsecurity compatibility Mathias Krause
2021-07-06 13:27 ` [PATCH 2/2] curve25519-x86_64: solve register constraints with reserved registers Mathias Krause
2021-08-08 20:53 ` [PATCH 0/2] wireguard-linux-compat: grsecurity compat patches Jason A. Donenfeld
2021-08-09 10:13 ` Mathias Krause
2021-12-03 22:20 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2021-12-03 22:25 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2021-12-06 14:04 ` Mathias Krause [this message]
2021-12-06 14:48 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2021-12-06 16:24 ` Mathias Krause
2021-12-06 16:27 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2021-12-06 18:18 ` Mathias Krause
2021-12-06 18:55 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2021-12-06 19:28 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2021-12-06 20:54 ` Mathias Krause
2021-12-08 14:56 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2021-12-06 21:00 ` Mathias Krause
2021-12-08 14:56 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2021-12-09 7:59 ` Mathias Krause
2021-12-10 22:36 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2021-12-10 22:58 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2021-12-11 16:35 ` Aymeric Fromherz
2021-12-12 21:43 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2021-12-13 7:54 ` Mathias Krause
2021-12-13 11:36 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2021-12-13 16:29 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2021-12-13 16:46 ` Mathias Krause
2021-12-13 7:44 ` Mathias Krause
2021-12-13 14:20 ` Aymeric Fromherz
2021-12-13 14:33 ` Mathias Krause
2021-12-13 14:37 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2021-12-13 16:32 ` Mathias Krause
2021-12-13 16:33 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2021-12-13 16:39 ` Mathias Krause
2021-12-13 16:53 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3a2d41dc-effb-158c-4a52-d7eb282ecb7e@grsecurity.net \
--to=minipli@grsecurity.net \
--cc=Jason@zx2c4.com \
--cc=wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).