* [9fans] bind -c[ab] -- what am I doing wrong? @ 2003-07-17 16:13 andrey mirtchovski 2003-07-17 17:42 ` northern snowfall 0 siblings, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread From: andrey mirtchovski @ 2003-07-17 16:13 UTC (permalink / raw) To: 9fans It is my understanding that a bind() should be "commutative" with respect to before/after, i.e.: bind -cb new old <==> bind -ca old new why does the following create fail? plan9% bind -cb $home/kern/cmd /sys/src/cmd plan9% touch /sys/src/cmd/blah # expected to succeed plan9% ls -l $home/kern/cmd/blah --rw-rw-r-- M 159 andrey andrey 0 Jul 17 10:06 /usr/andrey/kern/cmd/blah plan9% unmount /sys/src/cmd plan9% rm $home/kern/cmd/blah plan9% bind -ca /sys/src/cmd $home/kern/cmd plan9% touch $home/kern/cmd/blah # expected to succeed touch: /usr/andrey/kern/cmd/blah: cannot create: permission denied plan9% touch /sys/src/cmd/blah # expected to fail touch: /sys/src/cmd/blah: cannot create: permission denied plan9% who's to blame? ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] bind -c[ab] -- what am I doing wrong? 2003-07-17 16:13 [9fans] bind -c[ab] -- what am I doing wrong? andrey mirtchovski @ 2003-07-17 17:42 ` northern snowfall 2003-07-17 17:10 ` andrey mirtchovski 0 siblings, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread From: northern snowfall @ 2003-07-17 17:42 UTC (permalink / raw) To: 9fans; +Cc: andrey mirtchovski, dbailey27 > > >who's to blame? > You are! Binds make a list of directories like a linked list chain. Our operations on these directories can always be considered one of two primaries: read or write. Respectively, we can think as the first link in the chain as the link we Read from: cpu% cd cpu% mkdir testme cpu% cat > testme/u.h << EOF hello! EOF cpu% bind -bc testme /386/include cpu% wc -l /386/include/u.h 1 /386/include/u.h cpu% cat /386/include/u.h hello! cpu% unmount /386/include Or, we Read from the first bound directory that contains the file we've requested access to. So, if 'testme' didn't contain an u.h, the Read would return /386/include/u.h, despite testme being bound 'before' /386/include/u.h. Writes always take effect in the first directory we have permission to write to in the chain. Most often this is the last link in the chain: cpu% bind -ac testme /386/include/ cpu% touch /386/include/foo cpu% ls -l testme/foo --rw-rw-r-- M 2265 snowfall snowfall 0 Jul 17 11:35 testme/foo cpu% unmount /386/include cpu% So, if multiple directories we can write to were bound 'after' our primary unwritable, we write to the first: cpu% bind -ac /tmp /386/include cpu% bind -ac testme /386/include cpu% touch /386/include/foo2 cpu% ls -l /tmp/foo2 --rw-rw-r-- M 2265 snowfall snowfall 0 Jul 17 11:38 /tmp/foo2 cpu% Hope that helps! Don http://www.7f.no-ip.com/~north_ > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] bind -c[ab] -- what am I doing wrong? 2003-07-17 17:42 ` northern snowfall @ 2003-07-17 17:10 ` andrey mirtchovski 2003-07-17 17:18 ` boyd, rounin 0 siblings, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread From: andrey mirtchovski @ 2003-07-17 17:10 UTC (permalink / raw) To: 9fans On Thu, 17 Jul 2003, northern snowfall wrote: > > Hope that helps! > well, it doesn't. what you describe is the bahaviour of the command according to the man page. but here's what I observe: plan9% touch kern/test # clearly I can write to it plan9% rm kern/test plan9% bind -ac /sys kern plan9% touch kern/test # but not anymore touch: kern/test: cannot create: permission denied plan9% plan9% unmount kern plan9% bind -ac kern /sys plan9% touch /sys/blah # this works as expected plan9% given the man page i expect 'bind -ac new /something/i/can/write/to' to allow me to continue to write to '/something/i/can/write/to'. in fact, I expect to be able to write to '/something/i/can/write/to' irregardless of whether it corresponds to 'new', 'old', is bound before or bound after a directory. the only case when I wouldn't expect to be able to write to it is when I'm not able to walk to it because of a bind -b earlier in the walk. in functional languages this technique is used as a formal proof of a program's correctness, observe this example from the haskell prelude: -- Minimal complete definition: (==) or (/=) x == y = not (x/=y) x /= y = not (x==y) a similar definition for 'bind' would be: bind -cb new old == bind -ca old new where, of course, we consider only the resulting directory, and not the path to it. andrey ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] bind -c[ab] -- what am I doing wrong? 2003-07-17 17:10 ` andrey mirtchovski @ 2003-07-17 17:18 ` boyd, rounin 2003-07-17 17:34 ` andrey mirtchovski 2003-07-17 17:35 ` [9fans] bind -c[ab] -- what am I doing wrong? David Presotto 0 siblings, 2 replies; 16+ messages in thread From: boyd, rounin @ 2003-07-17 17:18 UTC (permalink / raw) To: 9fans union directories are a linked list. - open finds you the first file in the list bound directories, in the order they were bound [before/after] - create choose the first directory which allows creation, in the order they were bound [before/after] the order they were bound is not temporal, it's where you bind them. it's that easy. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] bind -c[ab] -- what am I doing wrong? 2003-07-17 17:18 ` boyd, rounin @ 2003-07-17 17:34 ` andrey mirtchovski 2003-07-17 17:37 ` David Presotto 2003-07-17 17:45 ` boyd, rounin 2003-07-17 17:35 ` [9fans] bind -c[ab] -- what am I doing wrong? David Presotto 1 sibling, 2 replies; 16+ messages in thread From: andrey mirtchovski @ 2003-07-17 17:34 UTC (permalink / raw) To: 9fans On Thu, 17 Jul 2003, boyd, rounin wrote: > it's that easy. > how easy is that then: plan9% ls -l | grep 'tmp|kern' d-rwxrwxr-x M 113 andrey andrey 0 Jul 17 10:53 kern d-rwxrwxr-x M 113 andrey andrey 0 Jul 17 11:32 tmp plan9% bind -ac /sys kern plan9% touch kern/blah touch: kern/blah: cannot create: permission denied plan9% bind -ac /sys tmp plan9% touch tmp/blah plan9% ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] bind -c[ab] -- what am I doing wrong? 2003-07-17 17:34 ` andrey mirtchovski @ 2003-07-17 17:37 ` David Presotto 2003-07-17 17:45 ` boyd, rounin 1 sibling, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread From: David Presotto @ 2003-07-17 17:37 UTC (permalink / raw) To: 9fans [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 214 bytes --] tmp is already a union directory (I'm assuming) so that the plan9% bind -ac /sys tmp is binding a directory with create permissions behind a mount point that already has a directory with create permissions. [-- Attachment #2: Type: message/rfc822, Size: 2660 bytes --] From: andrey mirtchovski <mirtchov@cpsc.ucalgary.ca> To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu Subject: Re: [9fans] bind -c[ab] -- what am I doing wrong? Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2003 11:34:25 -0600 (MDT) Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0307171132500.7478-100000@fbsd.cpsc.ucalgary.ca> On Thu, 17 Jul 2003, boyd, rounin wrote: > it's that easy. > how easy is that then: plan9% ls -l | grep 'tmp|kern' d-rwxrwxr-x M 113 andrey andrey 0 Jul 17 10:53 kern d-rwxrwxr-x M 113 andrey andrey 0 Jul 17 11:32 tmp plan9% bind -ac /sys kern plan9% touch kern/blah touch: kern/blah: cannot create: permission denied plan9% bind -ac /sys tmp plan9% touch tmp/blah plan9% ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] bind -c[ab] -- what am I doing wrong? 2003-07-17 17:34 ` andrey mirtchovski 2003-07-17 17:37 ` David Presotto @ 2003-07-17 17:45 ` boyd, rounin 2003-07-17 18:07 ` andrey mirtchovski 1 sibling, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread From: boyd, rounin @ 2003-07-17 17:45 UTC (permalink / raw) To: 9fans > plan9% bind -ac /sys kern > plan9% touch kern/blah > touch: kern/blah: cannot create: permission denied you don't have PERMISSION -- read the message. > plan9% touch tmp/blah i creates a file called blah in tmp -- nothing to do with sys. i'm going to stollys ... ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] bind -c[ab] -- what am I doing wrong? 2003-07-17 17:45 ` boyd, rounin @ 2003-07-17 18:07 ` andrey mirtchovski 2003-07-17 19:29 ` [9fans] Laptop and VM software vdharani 0 siblings, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread From: andrey mirtchovski @ 2003-07-17 18:07 UTC (permalink / raw) To: 9fans On Thu, 17 Jul 2003, boyd, rounin wrote: > you don't have PERMISSION -- read the message. > read my mail. i was EXPECTING to have permission. as usual, those who knew what's happening explained it clearly enough, thanx Dave. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [9fans] Laptop and VM software 2003-07-17 18:07 ` andrey mirtchovski @ 2003-07-17 19:29 ` vdharani 2003-07-17 18:34 ` jmk 0 siblings, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread From: vdharani @ 2003-07-17 19:29 UTC (permalink / raw) To: 9fans Hi, I am planning to buy a laptop. I want to install Win, Linux and Plan 9. Can you please suggest what VM software I should go for? VMware or Virtual PC? Also, can you suggest what model I should go for? IBM T23? Or better Txx model? Or someother brand/model? I kind-of figured from the mailing list and Wiki pages that T23 and VMware 4.0 are the ones I should go for but I just want to make sure. Any help appreciated. Thanks dharani ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] Laptop and VM software 2003-07-17 19:29 ` [9fans] Laptop and VM software vdharani @ 2003-07-17 18:34 ` jmk 2003-07-18 4:21 ` Adrian Tritschler 2003-07-19 17:28 ` Russ Cox 0 siblings, 2 replies; 16+ messages in thread From: jmk @ 2003-07-17 18:34 UTC (permalink / raw) To: 9fans On Thu Jul 17 14:16:28 EDT 2003, vdharani@infernopark.com wrote: > Hi, > > I am planning to buy a laptop. I want to install Win, Linux and Plan 9. > > Can you please suggest what VM software I should go for? VMware or Virtual > PC? > > Also, can you suggest what model I should go for? IBM T23? Or better Txx > model? Or someother brand/model? > > I kind-of figured from the mailing list and Wiki pages that T23 and VMware > 4.0 are the ones I should go for but I just want to make sure. > > Any help appreciated. > > Thanks > dharani Even the T23 is not uniform. We have ones with the internal Intel 82557 ethernet controller, the T23 is also available with an internal 3Com controller and, if I remember correctly, there was a problem with that. VMware is the only choice. Virtual PC doesn't implement the PC it says it does and Plan 9 finds that out. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] Laptop and VM software 2003-07-17 18:34 ` jmk @ 2003-07-18 4:21 ` Adrian Tritschler 2003-07-18 9:07 ` vdharani 2003-07-18 11:52 ` C H Forsyth 2003-07-19 17:28 ` Russ Cox 1 sibling, 2 replies; 16+ messages in thread From: Adrian Tritschler @ 2003-07-18 4:21 UTC (permalink / raw) To: 9fans jmk@plan9.bell-labs.com wrote: >On Thu Jul 17 14:16:28 EDT 2003, vdharani@infernopark.com wrote: > > >>Hi, >> >>I am planning to buy a laptop. I want to install Win, Linux and Plan 9. >> >>Can you please suggest what VM software I should go for? VMware or Virtual >>PC? >> >>Also, can you suggest what model I should go for? IBM T23? Or better Txx >>model? Or someother brand/model? >> >>I kind-of figured from the mailing list and Wiki pages that T23 and VMware >>4.0 are the ones I should go for but I just want to make sure. >> >>Any help appreciated. >> >>Thanks >>dharani >> >> > >Even the T23 is not uniform. We have ones with the internal Intel 82557 ethernet >controller, the T23 is also available with an internal 3Com controller and, if I >remember correctly, there was a problem with that. > That'd be my[1] IBM T21. :-( Plan9's 3com driver doesn't work with the "3Com 10/100 Mini PCI Ethernet Adapter" that was supplied with it. It's not really a case of "internal vs external" controller, both are internal mini-PCI cards, one works, one doesn't. If anyone can give me any hints on making it work, or how to debug a network card driver, I'm all ears... >VMware is the only choice. Virtual PC doesn't implement the PC it says it does and plan 9 finds that out. > Adrian [1] my employer's T21, provided for "work and work-related purposes" ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] Laptop and VM software 2003-07-18 4:21 ` Adrian Tritschler @ 2003-07-18 9:07 ` vdharani 2003-07-18 8:24 ` Adrian Tritschler 2003-07-18 11:52 ` C H Forsyth 1 sibling, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread From: vdharani @ 2003-07-18 9:07 UTC (permalink / raw) To: 9fans Hi, > Plan9's 3com driver doesn't work with the "3Com 10/100 Mini PCI > Ethernet Adapter" that was supplied with it. It's not really a case of > "internal vs external" controller, both are internal mini-PCI cards, > one works, one doesn't. > > If anyone can give me any hints on making it work, or how to debug a > network card driver, I'm all ears... This could be a dumb question. If it is Mini PCI card, why cant you replace it with an 82557 card? Is availability an issue? Regards dharani ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] Laptop and VM software 2003-07-18 9:07 ` vdharani @ 2003-07-18 8:24 ` Adrian Tritschler 0 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread From: Adrian Tritschler @ 2003-07-18 8:24 UTC (permalink / raw) To: 9fans vdharani@infernopark.com wrote: > Hi, >>Plan9's 3com driver doesn't work with the "3Com 10/100 Mini PCI >>Ethernet Adapter" that was supplied with it. It's not really a case of >>"internal vs external" controller, both are internal mini-PCI cards, >>one works, one doesn't. >>If anyone can give me any hints on making it work, or how to debug a >>network card driver, I'm all ears... > This could be a dumb question. If it is Mini PCI card, why cant you replace > it with an 82557 card? Is availability an issue? *I* could, if it belonged to me, but the PC belongs to my employer and was purchased for my work, which involves running Windows (in various flavours) and supporting NetWare and Windows servers. Any plan9 installation on it is purely for my own enjoyment and education, it falls under the "reasonable personal use" clause of the IT Acceptable Use Policy. I've got three begged/borrowed bits of equipment that run plan9 in their spare time, none of them belong to me. Two desktop PCs, neither of which can run rio properly due to Trio3d oddities, and a laptop with working video but no network. It's educational, there's a log of what I do sitting on the boxes at http://ws-cl-28-g09-a.its.monash.edu.au/ I'm sure that a working 3com driver on the T21 would help others as well. There's also a Pentium133 at home that really does belong to me, and once there's a new distribution CD that lets me build venti/fossil at install time I'll give that one a try... A thought I had as a final part of the install routine, some way of sending a report back to the developers of "here's a working machine with xyz hardware, pci.txt, etc.." > Regards > dharani Adrian ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] Laptop and VM software 2003-07-18 4:21 ` Adrian Tritschler 2003-07-18 9:07 ` vdharani @ 2003-07-18 11:52 ` C H Forsyth 1 sibling, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread From: C H Forsyth @ 2003-07-18 11:52 UTC (permalink / raw) To: 9fans [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 16 bytes --] what went wrong? [-- Attachment #2: Type: message/rfc822, Size: 4235 bytes --] From: Adrian Tritschler <ajft@ajft.org> To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu Subject: Re: [9fans] Laptop and VM software Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2003 14:21:05 +1000 Message-ID: <3F1775B1.3090904@ajft.org> jmk@plan9.bell-labs.com wrote: >On Thu Jul 17 14:16:28 EDT 2003, vdharani@infernopark.com wrote: > > >>Hi, >> >>I am planning to buy a laptop. I want to install Win, Linux and Plan 9. >> >>Can you please suggest what VM software I should go for? VMware or Virtual >>PC? >> >>Also, can you suggest what model I should go for? IBM T23? Or better Txx >>model? Or someother brand/model? >> >>I kind-of figured from the mailing list and Wiki pages that T23 and VMware >>4.0 are the ones I should go for but I just want to make sure. >> >>Any help appreciated. >> >>Thanks >>dharani >> >> > >Even the T23 is not uniform. We have ones with the internal Intel 82557 ethernet >controller, the T23 is also available with an internal 3Com controller and, if I >remember correctly, there was a problem with that. > That'd be my[1] IBM T21. :-( Plan9's 3com driver doesn't work with the "3Com 10/100 Mini PCI Ethernet Adapter" that was supplied with it. It's not really a case of "internal vs external" controller, both are internal mini-PCI cards, one works, one doesn't. If anyone can give me any hints on making it work, or how to debug a network card driver, I'm all ears... >VMware is the only choice. Virtual PC doesn't implement the PC it says it does and plan 9 finds that out. > Adrian [1] my employer's T21, provided for "work and work-related purposes" ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] Laptop and VM software 2003-07-17 18:34 ` jmk 2003-07-18 4:21 ` Adrian Tritschler @ 2003-07-19 17:28 ` Russ Cox 1 sibling, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread From: Russ Cox @ 2003-07-19 17:28 UTC (permalink / raw) To: 9fans > VMware is the only choice. Virtual PC doesn't implement the PC it says it does and > Plan 9 finds that out. It might not be that hard to get Plan 9 going under VPC, but no one has done the work. Russ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] bind -c[ab] -- what am I doing wrong? 2003-07-17 17:18 ` boyd, rounin 2003-07-17 17:34 ` andrey mirtchovski @ 2003-07-17 17:35 ` David Presotto 1 sibling, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread From: David Presotto @ 2003-07-17 17:35 UTC (permalink / raw) To: 9fans [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 506 bytes --] The confusing part may be the implicit bind that happens when you do bind -ca /sys/src/cmd $home/kern/cmd The resulting mount point has to things in the link list bound there: /sys/src/cmd - containing the create flag $home/kern/cmd - not containing the create flag The latter is implicit since you were binding -a onto a directory. You would have gotten the semantics you wanted if you had said instead: bind -c $home/kern/cmd $home/kern/cmd bind -ca /sys/src/cmd $home/kern/cmd [-- Attachment #2: Type: message/rfc822, Size: 2559 bytes --] From: "boyd, rounin" <boyd@insultant.net> To: <9fans@cse.psu.edu> Subject: Re: [9fans] bind -c[ab] -- what am I doing wrong? Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2003 19:18:22 +0200 Message-ID: <00b901c34c87$6d509780$b9844051@insultant.net> union directories are a linked list. - open finds you the first file in the list bound directories, in the order they were bound [before/after] - create choose the first directory which allows creation, in the order they were bound [before/after] the order they were bound is not temporal, it's where you bind them. it's that easy. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-07-19 17:28 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 16+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2003-07-17 16:13 [9fans] bind -c[ab] -- what am I doing wrong? andrey mirtchovski 2003-07-17 17:42 ` northern snowfall 2003-07-17 17:10 ` andrey mirtchovski 2003-07-17 17:18 ` boyd, rounin 2003-07-17 17:34 ` andrey mirtchovski 2003-07-17 17:37 ` David Presotto 2003-07-17 17:45 ` boyd, rounin 2003-07-17 18:07 ` andrey mirtchovski 2003-07-17 19:29 ` [9fans] Laptop and VM software vdharani 2003-07-17 18:34 ` jmk 2003-07-18 4:21 ` Adrian Tritschler 2003-07-18 9:07 ` vdharani 2003-07-18 8:24 ` Adrian Tritschler 2003-07-18 11:52 ` C H Forsyth 2003-07-19 17:28 ` Russ Cox 2003-07-17 17:35 ` [9fans] bind -c[ab] -- what am I doing wrong? David Presotto
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).