Re: [9fans] Someone let the domain go

Re: [9fans] Someone let the domain go

[akumar]

Yes, apparently as far back as March/April of 2001.

don't ask me why I know
ak

Re: [9fans] Someone let the domain go

[Bruce Ellis]

the crack support team were busy

brucee
.
On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 12:08 PM, <akumar@mail.nanosouffle.net> wrote:
> Yes, apparently as far back as March/April of 2001.
>
> don't ask me why I know
> ak

Re: [9fans] Someone let the domain go

[C H Forsyth]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 518 bytes --]

Lucent had little to do with Inferno externally
after 1 September 1999, and nothing to do with
it externally (technically) after 1 March 2000, so there was
no reason for Lucent to keep that external domain name.
Internally Inferno continued in use in Lucent in
several projects (both products and research),
but even control of the trademarks had been transferred.

I've no idea why the current owners of that domain name bother
to keep it registered. Perhaps there's a little back story there;
I don't know.

[-- Attachment #2: Type: message/rfc822, Size: 2056 bytes --]

From: akumar@mail.nanosouffle.net
To: 9fans@9fans.net
Subject: Re: [9fans] Someone let the domain go
Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2009 19:08:08 -0700
Message-ID: <ead26941e82adeb6f77cce7b3084fc15@mail.nanosouffle.net>

Yes, apparently as far back as March/April of 2001.

don't ask me why I know
ak

Re: [9fans] Someone let the domain go

[Uriel]

On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 1:41 PM, C H Forsyth<forsyth@vitanuova.com> wrote:
> I've no idea why the current owners of that domain name bother
> to keep it registered. Perhaps there's a little back story there;
> I don't know.

Likely Google juice, there are still plenty of high-rank links
pointing there lying around the net.

That and probably the amount of mistaken ad clicks are enough to cover
their registration fees, so why would they let it go?

uriel



>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: akumar@mail.nanosouffle.net
> To: 9fans@9fans.net
> Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2009 19:08:08 -0700
> Subject: Re: [9fans] Someone let the domain go
> Yes, apparently as far back as March/April of 2001.
>
> don't ask me why I know
> ak
>
>

Re: [9fans] Someone let the domain go

[maht]

Uriel wrote:
> Likely Google juice, there are still plenty of high-rank links
> pointing there lying around the net.
>
That's how I found it, someone asked about InfernoSpaces and I ended up
here http://ai.ijs.si/mezi/agents/agents.html

Re: [9fans] Someone let the domain go

[Uriel]

It might be worth trying to get control back, I think you can do that
for domain squatters that violate trademarks, as is clearly the case
here.

uriel

On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 10:58 AM, maht<mattmobile@proweb.co.uk> wrote:
> Uriel wrote:
>>
>> Likely Google juice, there are still plenty of high-rank links
>> pointing there lying around the net.
>>
>
> That's how I found it, someone asked about InfernoSpaces and I ended up here
> http://ai.ijs.si/mezi/agents/agents.html
>
>
>
>

Re: [9fans] Someone let the domain go

[J.R. Mauro]

On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 1:30 PM, Uriel<uriel99@gmail.com> wrote:
> It might be worth trying to get control back, I think you can do that
> for domain squatters that violate trademarks, as is clearly the case
> here.

I think that's only if the trademark owner pursues it, and the US may
have other draconian clauses to the effect of "use it or lose it", at
least I know there's a statute of limitations on some things about
trademark infringement. Worth a look, though, if someone cares.

>
> uriel
>
> On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 10:58 AM, maht<mattmobile@proweb.co.uk> wrote:
>> Uriel wrote:
>>>
>>> Likely Google juice, there are still plenty of high-rank links
>>> pointing there lying around the net.
>>>
>>
>> That's how I found it, someone asked about InfernoSpaces and I ended up here
>> http://ai.ijs.si/mezi/agents/agents.html
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>

[9fans] Someone let the domain go

[matt]

http://www.lucent-inferno.com/


er nsfw btw !