9fans - fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Brantley Coile <brantley@coraid.com>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] MS Research reinvents Inferno?
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 11:39:16 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <92e92cc631c99b8b7918fac54c801ec4@coraid.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <283f5df10512130826u1fd2f19ahf71d310e0b6b7ff3@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 251 bytes --]

I note that the paper didn't reference any other Plan 9'ish
things other than Inferno.  Not having read the paper I assume
that it is an Inferno like thing.  I wonder then, why they
don't reference Wirth's and Gutknecht's Oberon system?
Rob did.

[-- Attachment #2: Type: message/rfc822, Size: 7295 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2.1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1612 bytes --]

Let's see, first there was the Cyclone clone (Vault C), now there is a
Plan9-ish/EROS-ish kernel...
Before all of this was "Active Directory" (Kerberos/LDAP)...
The 'research' seems to be focused upon many things already released into
the wild &
brining them to the point of being 'Microsoft' products...
 -- Stefan

On 12/13/05, Sergey Zhilkin <szhilkin@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Microsoft reinventing the wheels since 1980 :)
> Any sources of Sing ?
> Inferno IS better :) and also OpenSource :)
>
> On 12/13/05, Skip Tavakkolian <9nut@9netics.com> wrote:
> > I'm not sure if this is old news to you all. It's something
> > that MS Research calls 'Singularity'.
> >
> > ftp://ftp.research.microsoft.com/pub/tr/TR-2005-135.pdf
> >
> > and a some interviews with the (re)inventors here:
> >
> > http://channel9.msdn.com/Showpost.aspx?postid=68302
> > http://channel9.msdn.com/Showpost.aspx?postid=141858
> >
> >
>



--
Nietzsche's first step is to accept what he knows. Atheism for him goes
without saying and is "contructive and
radical". Nietzsche's supreme vocation, so he says, is to provoke a kind of
crisis and a final decision about the
problem of atheism. The world continues on its course at random and there is
nothing final about it. Thus God
is useless, since He wants nothing in particular. If he wanted something --
and here we recognize the traditional
forumlation of the problem of evil -- He would have to assume responsiblity
for "a sum total of pain and inconsistency
which would debase the entire value of being born."
-- Albert Camus, L'Homme révolté

[-- Attachment #2.1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 2251 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2005-12-13 16:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 71+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-12-13  7:02 Skip Tavakkolian
2005-12-13  7:13 ` Devon H. O'Dell
2005-12-13  8:50 ` Oliver Bandel
2005-12-13 15:04   ` Kenneth Long
2005-12-13 12:26 ` Sergey Zhilkin
2005-12-13 16:26   ` LiteStar numnums
2005-12-13 16:30     ` Paul Lalonde
2005-12-13 16:39     ` Brantley Coile [this message]
2005-12-13 16:53       ` Charles Forsyth
2005-12-13 17:54       ` Skip Tavakkolian
2005-12-13 16:49     ` Ronald G Minnich
2005-12-13 16:57       ` Lucio De Re
2005-12-13 17:02         ` alexandr babic
2005-12-13 17:43           ` Russ Cox
2005-12-13 17:56             ` Charles Forsyth
2005-12-13 20:19               ` Oliver Bandel
2005-12-13 20:52                 ` David Leimbach
2005-12-14  2:12                   ` Oliver Bandel
2005-12-14  2:19                     ` andrey mirtchovski
2005-12-14 10:02                       ` Richard Miller
2005-12-14  4:01               ` Bruce Ellis
2005-12-13 17:56             ` Charles Forsyth
2005-12-13 18:07               ` alexandr babic
2005-12-14  0:02               ` Steve Simon
2005-12-14  9:42                 ` Richard Miller
2005-12-14 10:09                   ` C H Forsyth
2005-12-13 18:16             ` William Josephson
2005-12-13 20:46               ` David Leimbach
2005-12-13 21:05                 ` Brantley Coile
2005-12-14  2:05                   ` Oliver Bandel
2005-12-13 18:45             ` Brantley Coile
2005-12-13 18:50               ` Russ Cox
2005-12-13 18:55                 ` andrey mirtchovski
2005-12-13 19:02                   ` Russ Cox
2005-12-14  6:30                     ` Jack Johnson
2005-12-14  7:16                       ` Jack Johnson
2005-12-14 10:07                         ` Richard Miller
2005-12-13 20:49                   ` David Leimbach
2005-12-13 22:09                     ` Skip Tavakkolian
2005-12-13 21:20                       ` LiteStar numnums
2005-12-13 21:54                       ` David Leimbach
2005-12-13 20:18             ` Oliver Bandel
2005-12-14  5:56             ` Jack Johnson
2005-12-14  6:02               ` Lucio De Re
2005-12-14  9:50                 ` Steve Simon
2005-12-14  6:05               ` andrey mirtchovski
2005-12-14  6:14                 ` andrey mirtchovski
2005-12-14  9:28                 ` Russ Cox
2005-12-14  7:29               ` Andriy G. Tereshchenko
2005-12-14 14:49               ` Brantley Coile
2005-12-14 10:11             ` Richard Miller
2005-12-14 11:00               ` Russ Cox
2005-12-14 12:47                 ` erik quanstrom
2005-12-14 15:06               ` Brantley Coile
2005-12-14 16:20                 ` C H Forsyth
2005-12-14 22:00                   ` David Leimbach
2005-12-13 17:14       ` David Leimbach
2005-12-13 18:13         ` Ronald G Minnich
2005-12-14  3:05           ` erik quanstrom
2005-12-13 17:43       ` Wes Kussmaul
2005-12-13 18:04       ` Bakul Shah
2005-12-13 18:15         ` Ronald G Minnich
2005-12-13 20:04     ` Oliver Bandel
2005-12-14  5:02     ` Jack Johnson
2005-12-14 12:26       ` LiteStar numnums
     [not found] ` <000401c5ffe3$22447ce0$14aaa8c0@utelsystems.local>
2005-12-13 13:01   ` "Nils O. Selåsdal"
2005-12-13 16:36     ` Charles Forsyth
2005-12-14 15:42 Brian L.Stuart
2005-12-14 16:20 ` Paweł Lasek
2005-12-14 19:14 Brian L.Stuart
2005-12-14 20:06 Brian L.Stuart

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=92e92cc631c99b8b7918fac54c801ec4@coraid.com \
    --to=brantley@coraid.com \
    --cc=9fans@cse.psu.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).