9fans - fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Russ Cox" <rsc@swtch.com>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] Re: configure misery
Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2003 16:46:45 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <E1ALUjM-0006XR-Ba@t40.swtch.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 16 Nov 2003 12:32:10 MST." <Pine.LNX.4.44.0311161231100.6550-100000@fbsd.cpsc.ucalgary.ca>

> > Also, FreeBSD has reverted to BWK awk for /usr/bin/awk.
>
> The BSD's would like to be completely free of all GNU software for pretty
> much the same reasons people bash it on this list. Just ask Theo :)

Actually, only OpenBSD, and for completely different reasons.

OpenBSD wants to be free of GNU software for purely ideological reasons.
If the same software were available under the BSD license they would have
no problem whatsoever keeping it around.  Listen to what Theo has said
here -- if 8c were available under a BSD license, he'd use it.  Otherwise not.
Regardless of its technical merits or not vs. gcc.  I'm not aware that
any of the other BSDs are itching to get rid of all their GNU software.
Judging from the CVS and other logs, it appears that FreeBSD switched
to BWK awk mainly because gawk had problems on the Sparc64.

On this list, my impression is that people bash the GNU software because
the canonical examples (gcc, configure, etc.) are overly complicated, slow,
and hard to understand.  These are very practical reasons.  If software
written like Plan 9 were available under a GPL, I would use it and happily
incorporate it into the distribution if it were useful.

Ideology vs. a certain kind of software quality.

Finally (and this is more directed at Lyndon's post than yours) not all
GNU software is crap.  Some of it is quite good, and I believe that gawk
and groff are examples of this.  Arguably groff is built better than troff.
(I'm not as familar with gawk vs. awk so don't construe my lack of comment
as anything other than ignorance.)  Assuming that GNU software has uniform
software quality is simply flawed.

Getting back to the original topic, I think forsyth summed up well.
It's not clear to me that configure buys you much more than #ifdefs
nowadays, though in the days of many varied vendor systems I can
believe it had more utility.  I am particularly amused by the configure
scripts that have begun appearing recently, which churn for a while
and then say something approximating "config.sub: I've never heard
of a system called `plan9' before, so I'm not continuing."

Russ


  parent reply	other threads:[~2003-11-16 21:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-11-16  8:04 Aharon Robbins
2003-11-16  8:37 ` Geoff Collyer
2003-11-16 14:46   ` Charles Forsyth
2003-11-16  9:53 ` Bruce Ellis
2003-11-16 19:11 ` Lyndon Nerenberg
2003-11-16 19:32   ` andrey mirtchovski
2003-11-16 21:43     ` Dan Cross
2003-11-16 23:37       ` Lyndon Nerenberg
2003-11-17  0:04         ` mirtchov
2003-11-17  0:04           ` boyd, rounin
2003-11-17  3:18         ` Dan Cross
2003-11-17  3:28           ` boyd, rounin
2003-11-16 21:46     ` Russ Cox [this message]
2003-11-16 22:24       ` mirtchov
2003-11-16 22:47         ` Russ Cox
2003-11-17  0:38         ` Mike Haertel
2003-11-16 22:38       ` Lyndon Nerenberg
2003-11-16 22:41         ` boyd, rounin
2003-11-18 12:54         ` Aharon Robbins
2003-11-18 14:11           ` Russ Cox
2003-11-18 14:55             ` Joel Salomon
2003-11-17  0:24       ` Enache Adrian
2003-11-17 12:16         ` Aharon Robbins
2003-11-17 23:16           ` Taj Khattra
2003-11-16 19:58   ` boyd, rounin
2003-11-17  0:30     ` [9fans] mmap (was configure misery) Geoff Collyer
2003-11-17  0:29       ` boyd, rounin
2003-11-17 12:25   ` [9fans] Re: configure misery Aharon Robbins
2003-11-17  0:42 ` John Stalker
2003-11-17 12:28   ` Aharon Robbins
2003-11-17 12:42     ` Lucio De Re
2003-11-17 12:53       ` Lucio De Re
2003-11-17 13:43         ` Aharon Robbins
2003-11-17 15:06           ` mirtchov
2003-11-17 15:35           ` David Presotto
2003-11-17 16:31       ` John Stalker
2003-11-17 17:19         ` Aharon Robbins
2004-01-30 15:30 [9fans] Re: [hangar18-general] Frustration Jim Choate
2004-02-03 17:11 ` [9fans] Re: configure misery rog
2004-02-04 16:48   ` Jim Choate
2004-02-03  3:49 Li Yi
2004-02-03 11:30 ` Aharon Robbins
2004-02-03 13:32   ` a
2004-02-03 15:34     ` Jim Choate
2004-02-03 16:29       ` a
2004-02-03 14:18   ` andrey mirtchovski
2004-02-03 15:36     ` Jim Choate
2004-02-03 16:32       ` boyd, rounin
2004-02-03 16:42         ` Jim Choate
2004-02-03 23:53       ` David Presotto
2004-02-04  8:13     ` Aharon Robbins
2004-02-03 15:33   ` Jim Choate
2004-02-03 16:27     ` a
2004-02-03 16:44       ` Jim Choate
2004-02-03 16:53         ` andrey mirtchovski
2004-02-04 16:45           ` Jim Choate
2004-02-03 17:01         ` Wes Kussmaul
2004-02-04 17:47 Spamm Trapp

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=E1ALUjM-0006XR-Ba@t40.swtch.com \
    --to=rsc@swtch.com \
    --cc=9fans@cse.psu.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).