caml-list - the Caml user's mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oleg <oleg_inconnu@myrealbox.com>
To: Alessandro Baretta <alex@baretta.com>, Ocaml <caml-list@inria.fr>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Rule based language [was: productivity improvement]
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2002 05:53:52 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200207230951.FAA15922@dewberry.cc.columbia.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3D3AB082.2080503@baretta.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1790 bytes --]

On Sunday 21 July 2002 09:00 am, Alessandro Baretta wrote:
> Oleg wrote:
> > Alex,
> >
> > This looks pretty simple. What makes you think the program is a
> > compelling evidence of O'Caml superior productivity?
>
> 197 lines of code, including whitespace and commments. I
> think it is a pretty clear example of how you can write cool
> software in O'Caml in a very short time. If you had not been
> "lazy", as you said, and had tried implementing the same
> language in C++, I strongly doubt you could have written a
> more compact source.


109 LOC in C++ counting blank lines and lines containing a single '}'. See 
atttached files.

A few notes about the differences between your O'Caml program and my C++ 
program: 

1) I'm not using Yacc or Lex for parsing, because I'm not familiar with these 
tools, so ugly parsing takes up most of those 109 LOC (Parsing things is 
peripheral to my professional interests right now. I don't write compilers)

2) I decided not to implement the "simple" keyword, because I did not 
understand what it was supposed to mean (a depth limit on deduction, I'm 
guessing, but what for?)

3) Your program fails to imlement multi-token post-conditions in rules and 
mutli-token goals (as described in your formal language specification)

4) The algorithms are different I think, resulting in, for example, about 
200x speed improvement for the attached test.input file on my P3-800MHz 
(g++-3.0 vs ocamlopt) (The output is identical).  The O'Caml program 
convergence seems to be quite unstable.  Sometimes it is as fast or even 
faster than the C++ program. 

I can see how the same algorithm can be implemented in ~100 LOC of O'Caml 
too. However, IMO as this and the previous examples show, reports about 
extreme LOC ratios are premature.

Cheers,
Oleg

[-- Attachment #2: test.input.gz --]
[-- Type: application/x-gzip, Size: 13749 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #3: rules.cpp.gz --]
[-- Type: application/x-gzip, Size: 1098 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2002-07-23  9:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 62+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20020716172916.4903.qmail@web10702.mail.yahoo.com>
2002-07-18 23:14 ` [Caml-list] productivity improvement Oleg
2002-07-18 23:27   ` Brian Smith
2002-07-18 23:54   ` William Lovas
2002-07-19  3:59     ` Oleg
     [not found]       ` <20020719010318.B3631@boson.den.co.bbnow.net>
2002-07-19  8:22         ` Oleg
2002-07-19  8:57           ` Andreas Rossberg
2002-07-19 10:14             ` Alessandro Baretta
2002-07-19 18:15               ` John Max Skaller
2002-07-19 18:33                 ` Brian Smith
2002-07-20 17:30                   ` John Max Skaller
2002-07-19 19:06                 ` Alessandro Baretta
2002-07-20 17:49                   ` John Max Skaller
2002-07-19 10:34             ` Oleg
2002-07-19 17:25               ` Andreas Rossberg
2002-07-20 16:58                 ` John Max Skaller
2002-07-19 16:35     ` Brian Rogoff
2002-10-16 23:24       ` Eray Ozkural
2002-07-19  1:25   ` Alessandro Baretta
2002-07-19  4:04     ` Oleg
2002-07-19 15:46       ` [Caml-list] Rule based language [was: productivity improvement] Alessandro Baretta
2002-07-19 17:20         ` [Caml-list] compact.c Julie Farago
2002-10-15  9:31     ` [Caml-list] productivity improvement Eray Ozkural
2002-10-15 12:34       ` Oleg
2002-10-15 15:08         ` Eray Ozkural
2002-07-19  4:42   ` Emmanuel Renieris
2002-07-19  9:57     ` Oleg
2002-07-19 10:43       ` Alessandro Baretta
2002-07-19 10:52         ` Daniel de Rauglaudre
2002-07-19 11:36           ` Alessandro Baretta
2002-07-19 11:10       ` Xavier Leroy
2002-10-15  9:24         ` Eray Ozkural
2002-10-15 18:47           ` Pal-Kristian Engstad
2002-10-17  0:12             ` Eray Ozkural
2002-10-17  9:34               ` Diego Olivier Fernandez Pons
2002-10-17 15:55                 ` Jeffrey Palmer
2002-10-17 16:15                   ` brogoff
2002-10-17 18:21                   ` [Caml-list] Re: Camlp4 optimizations (was: productivity improvement) Christophe TROESTLER
2002-10-17 18:32                     ` Chris Hecker
2002-10-17 19:08                       ` Shivkumar Chandrasekaran
2002-10-17 20:01                         ` Chris Hecker
2002-10-17 19:36                       ` Daniel de Rauglaudre
2002-10-17 19:59                       ` Brian Hurt
2002-10-17 20:22                         ` Chris Hecker
2002-10-17 21:19                           ` Brian Hurt
2002-10-17 21:37                             ` Jeffrey Palmer
2002-10-17 23:55                               ` Alessandro Baretta
2002-10-18  0:57                                 ` Jeffrey Palmer
2002-10-18  4:21                                   ` Alessandro Baretta
2002-10-18  8:23                                     ` Remi VANICAT
2002-10-18  8:46                                       ` Sven Luther
2002-10-18  1:47                               ` Brian Hurt
2002-10-17 23:03                             ` Chris Hecker
2002-10-18 23:55                               ` brogoff
2002-10-18 10:43                   ` [Caml-list] productivity improvement Diego Olivier Fernandez Pons
2002-10-21  8:57                   ` Francois Pottier
     [not found] ` <200207200640.CAA11477@dewberry.cc.columbia.edu>
     [not found]   ` <3D391B41.50900@baretta.com>
     [not found]     ` <200207210059.UAA17003@dewberry.cc.columbia.edu>
2002-07-21 13:00       ` [Caml-list] Rule based language [was: productivity improvement] Alessandro Baretta
2002-07-23  9:53         ` Oleg [this message]
2002-07-24  8:07           ` Alessandro Baretta
2002-07-24 13:39 Arturo Borquez
2002-07-24 20:03 ` Oleg
2002-07-24 22:31 sajuma
2002-07-25  6:26 ` Oleg

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200207230951.FAA15922@dewberry.cc.columbia.edu \
    --to=oleg_inconnu@myrealbox.com \
    --cc=alex@baretta.com \
    --cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).