caml-list - the Caml user's mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sven Luther <luther@dpt-info.u-strasbg.fr>
To: Damien Doligez <damien.doligez@inria.fr>
Cc: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] User library license
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 11:27:14 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030225102714.GB841@iliana> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <89393F54-483D-11D7-B640-0003930FCE12@inria.fr>

On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 10:18:36PM +0100, Damien Doligez wrote:
> On Monday, February 24, 2003, at 10:24 AM, Sven Luther wrote:
> 
> >The problem with that is that anyone can take your work, modify it, and
> >don't give anything back, look at apple for example, they took the BSD
> >kernel, and don't give anything back.
> 
> Doh.  Apple has release all their changes to the BSD kernel
> under an open source licence.  If the kernel had been under GPL,
> that wouldn't have changed much for them.

Sure, but they don't release low level information on their hardware, in
particular not some stuff needed by the XFree86 developpers, altough
they are happy enough to integrate the XDarwin server in MacOS X.

Anyway, maybe it was not the best idea to take Apple as example, give me
another try. There is log of BSD code in windows NT, and Microsoft sure
didn't give anything back for it, they even tried to hijack the open
standards and such.

> > I think licencing is the main
> >reason they choose a BSD kernel over a linux one back then.
> 
> It was NeXT that chose a BSD kernel.  Darwin is the son of NeXTStep.
> Back then, Linux didn't exist, so the choice was not hard to make.

But they could have changed that in early 98 when Steve came back to
apple. I am sure one strong argument against it was the licencing.

> > I suppose some people (including me) would not be willing to
> >contribute code under these circunstances
> 
> The problem with these license discussions is that nobody knows
> what they are talking about.  We're not lawyers after all.

Speak for yourself, as a debian developper, i have to pay close
attention to licencing issues, and think i know at least something about
it. I am not sure a lawyer not specialized in computer licences would
know more about it than me.

But anyway, this is more a political decision than a legal one, and
again, please let's take this discution to some other place, i will no
more post on this subject here.

Friendly,

Sven Luther
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners


  reply	other threads:[~2003-02-25 10:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-02-23  6:30 Anonymous via the Cypherpunks Tonga Remailer
2003-02-23 17:00 ` Sven Luther
2003-02-23 19:57   ` Brian Hurt
2003-02-24  9:18     ` Sven Luther
2003-02-24  1:45   ` Nicolas Cannasse
2003-02-24  2:43     ` Brian Hurt
2003-02-24  9:26       ` Sven Luther
2003-02-24  9:37         ` Alessandro Baretta
2003-02-24 18:01           ` Blair Zajac
2003-02-24 13:43       ` John Max Skaller
2003-02-24  9:24     ` Sven Luther
2003-02-24  9:47       ` Nicolas Cannasse
2003-02-24 10:00         ` Sven Luther
2003-02-24 13:51           ` John Max Skaller
2003-02-24 18:00       ` Blair Zajac
2003-02-25  6:18         ` John Max Skaller
2003-02-25  9:12           ` Markus Mottl
2003-02-25 17:25             ` John Max Skaller
2003-02-24 18:52       ` Issac Trotts
2003-02-24 20:22         ` [Caml-list] off-topic: apple and bsd (was Re: User library license) james woodyatt
2003-02-24 21:18       ` [Caml-list] User library license Damien Doligez
2003-02-25 10:27         ` Sven Luther [this message]
2003-02-23 17:35 ` mgushee
2003-02-23 19:52 ` Brian Hurt
2003-02-24  9:35   ` Sven Luther

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20030225102714.GB841@iliana \
    --to=luther@dpt-info.u-strasbg.fr \
    --cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
    --cc=damien.doligez@inria.fr \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).